Pliers, not fingers: Tool-action effect in a motor intention paradigm

Cognition

Volumn 130, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 66-73

  Osiurak, François ^a   Badets, Arnaud ^b  

^a Lyon University   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Compatibility effect; Motor intention; Sensorimotor representations; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FINGER; GENERAL MEDICAL DEVICE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR COORDINATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PLIERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; TOOL USE; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT; BEHAVIOR; HAND; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; INTENTION; JUDGMENT; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886836089     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Badets A., Albinet C.T., Blandin Y. Sensory-based mechanism for delayed motor intention. Acta Psychologica 2012, 141:205-213.
2. Barsalou L.W. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1999, 22:577-660.
3. Beisert M., Massen C., Prinz W. Embodied rules in tool use: A tool-switching study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 36:359-372.
4. Binkofski, F., & Buxbaum, L. J. (in press). Two action systems in the human brain. Brain and Language.
5. Buxbaum L.J. Ideomotor apraxia: A call to action. Neurocase 2001, 7:445-448.
6. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language 2002, 82:179-199.
7. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
8. Chatterjee A. Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition 2010, 2:79-116.
9. Einstein G.O., McDaniel M.A. Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2005, 14:286-290.
10. Garcea F.E., Mahon B.Z. What is in a tool concept? Dissociating manipulation knowledge from function knowledge. Memory & Cognition 2012, 40:1303-1313.
11. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1449-1559.
12. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:581-589.
13. Goldenberg G., Spatt J. The neural basis of tool use. Brain 2009, 132:1645-1655.
14. Greenwald A.G. Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review 1970, 77:73-99.
15. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 17:2735-2740.
16. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-878.
17. Jarry C., Osiurak F., Delafuys D., Chauviré V., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Le Gall D. Apraxia of tool use: More evidence for the technical reasoning hypothesis. Cortex 2013, 49:2322-2333.
18. Koch I., Keller P., Prinz W. The ideomotor approach to action control: Implications for skilled performance. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2004, 2:362-375.
19. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: Clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22:480-494.
20. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology 2008, 102:59-70.
21. Massen C., Prinz W. Programming tool-use actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:692-704.
22. Massen C., Prinz W. Activation of actions rules in action observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:1118-1130.
23. Massen C., Prinz W. Movements, actions and tool-use actions: An ideomotor approach to imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 2009, 364:2349-2358.
24. Mechsner F., Kerzel D., Knoblich G., Prinz W. Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 2001, 414:69-73.
25. Negri G.A.L., Rumiati R.I., Zadini A., Ukmar M., Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. What is the role of motor stimulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2007, 24:795-816.
26. Osiurak F., Aubin G., Allain P., Jarry C., Richard I., Le Gall D. Object usage and object utilization. A single-case study. Neurocase 2008, 14:169-183.
27. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Allain P., Aubin G., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Richard I., et al. Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage. The technical reasoning model. Cortex 2009, 45:769-783.
28. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Le Gall D. Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning. Toward a dialectical theory of human tool use. Psychological Review 2010, 117:517-540.
29. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Le Gall D. Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis: New perspectives on apraxia of tool use. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:299-312.
30. Osiurak F., Jarry C., Lesourd M., Baumard J., Le Gall D. Mechanical problem-solving strategies in left-brain damage patients and apraxia of tool use. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:1964-1972.
31. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154.
32. Rothi L.J.G., Ochipa C., Heilman K.M. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991, 8:443-458.
33. Shin Y.K., Proctor R.W., Capaldi E.J. A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin 2010, 136:943-974.
34. Sutter C., Ladwig S., Oehl M., Müsseler J. Age effects on controlling tools with sensorimotor transformations. Frontiers in Psychology 2012, 3:573.
35. Tipper S.P., Paul M.A., Hayes P.E. Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:493-498.
36. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
37. Umiltà M., Escola L., Intskirveli I., Grammont F., Rochat M., Caruana F., et al. How pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2008, 105:2209-2213.