Two Outsiders' View on Feminism and Evolutionary Psychology: An Opportune Time for Adversarial Collaboration

Sex Roles

Volumn 69, Issue 9-10, 2013, Pages 503-506

  Nier, Jason A ^a   Campbell, Santiba D ^a  

^a The Holleran Center for Community Action and Public Policy   (United States)

Author keywords

Adversarial collaboration; Evolutionary psychology; Feminist psychology; Gender differences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886746646     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-012-0154-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Arkes, H., & Tetlock, P. E. (2004). Attributions of implicit prejudice, or "would Jesse Jackson fail the Implicit Association Test?". Psychological Inquiry, 15, 257-278. doi: 10. 1207/s15327965pli1504_01.
2. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Klick, J., Mellers, B. A., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2009a). Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the race IAT. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 567-582. doi: 10. 1037/a0014665.
3. Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Klick, J., Mellers, B. A., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2009b). Transparency should Trump trust: Rejoinder to McConnell and Leibold (2009) and Ziegert and Hanges (2009). Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 598-603. doi: 10. 1037/a0014666.
4. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2011). Evolutionary psychology and feminism. Sex Roles, 64, 768-787. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-011-9987-3.
5. Campbell, S. D. (2010). Race still matters: How race influences success and satisfaction for African American college students. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3423311).
6. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2011). Feminism and the evolution of sex differences and similarities. Sex Roles, 64, 758-767. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-011-9949-9.
7. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Sriram, N. (2006). Consequential validity of the Implicit Association Test: Comment on the article by Blanton and Jaccard. American Psychologist, 61, 56-61. doi: 10. 1037/0003-066X. 61. 1. 56.
8. Hannagan, R. J. (2008). Gendered political behavior: A Darwinian feminist approach. Sex Roles, 59, 465-475. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-008-9417-3.
9. Harris, C. R. (2011). Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered. Sex Roles, 64, 669-681. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-010-9772-8.
10. Jones, J. M., & Campbell, S. (2011). Cultural Psychology of African Americans. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, Unit 3. Retrieved from http://scholarworks. gvsu. edu/orpc/vol3/iss1/1.
11. Jost, J. T., Rudman, L. A., Blair, I. V., Carney, D., Dasgupta, N., Glaser, J., & Hardin, C. D. (2009). The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 39-69. doi: 10. 1016/j. riob. 2009. 10. 001.
12. Kahneman, D. (2003). Experiences of collaborative research. American Psychologist, 58, 723-730. doi: 10. 1037/0003-066X. 58. 9. 723.
13. Mellers, B. A., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12, 269-275. doi: 10. 1111/1467-9280. 00350.
14. Nier, J. A. (2005). How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 39-52. doi: 10. 1177/1368430205048615.
15. Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Nier, C. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2011). Can racial profiling be avoided under Arizona immigration law? Lessons learned from implicit bias research and anti- discrimination law. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy. Advance online publication. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1530-2415. 2011. 01248. x.
16. Singh, D., & Singh, D. (2011). Shape and significance of feminine beauty: An evolutionary perspective. Sex Roles, 64, 723-731. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-011-9938-z.
17. Smiler, A. P. (2011). Sexual strategies theory: Built for the short term or long term? Sex Roles, 64, 603-612. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-010-9817-z.
18. Smith, C. A., & Konik, J. A. (Eds.). (2011a). Feminist appraisals of evolutionary psychology. [Special Issue]. Sex Roles, 64(9-10).
19. Smith, C. A., & Konik, J. A. (2011b). Feminism and evolutionary psychology: Allies, adversaries, or both? An introduction to a special issue. Sex Roles, 64, 595-602. doi: 10. 1007/s11199-011-9985-5.
20. Tierney, J. (2008, November 18). In bias test, shades of gray. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www. nytimes. com/2008/11/18/science/18tier. html.
21. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293-315.
22. Ziegert, J. C., & Hanges, P. J. (2009). Strong rebuttal for weak criticisms: Reply to Blanton et al. (2009). Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 590-597. doi: 10. 1037/a0014661.