Centralization in the global avoided deforestation collaboration network

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1199-1210

  Gallemore, Caleb ^b   Munroe, Darla K ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Earth system governance; Global governance; Networks; Polycentricity; Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation

Indexed keywords

CENTRALIZATION; DEFORESTATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION;

GERMANY; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 84886729294     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Abbott K.W. The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2012, 30(4):571-590.
2. Accra Caucus on Forests and Climate Change, 2011. Is REDD-readiness taking us in the right direction? Accra Caucus. URL . http://www.fern.org/sites/fern.org/files/Accra2011_eng.pdf.
3. Adger W.N., Brown K., Tompkins E.L. The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society 2005, 10(2):9.
4. Agrawal A., Nepstad D., Chhatre A. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2011, 36(November (1)):373-396.
5. Bardhan P. Decentralization of governance and development. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2002, 16(4):185-205.
6. Beymer-Farris B.A., Bassett T.J. The REDD menace: resurgent protectionism in Tanzania's mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change 2012, 22(2):332-341.
7. Biermann F. Earth system governance: a research agenda. Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers 2008, 277-301. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (Chapter 9). O.R. Young, L.A. King, H. Schroeder (Eds.).
8. Biermann F., Gupta A. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: a research framework. Ecological Economics 2011, 70(September (11)):1856-1864.
9. Biermann F., Pattberg P. Global environmental governance: taking stock, moving forward. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2008, 33(November (1)):277-294.
10. Biermann F., Betsill M.M., Gupta J., Kanie N., Lebel L., Liverman D., Schroeder H., Siebenhüner B., Zondervan R. Earth system governance: a research framework. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2010, 10(October (4)):277-298.
11. Biermann F., Pattberg P., van Asselt H., Zelli F. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 2009, 9(November (4)):14-40.
12. Bodin O., Crona B.L. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference?. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:175-193.
13. Bodin O., Crona B.L., Ernstson H. Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective?. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2):r2.
14. Bosso C.J. Environment, Inc.: From Grassroots to Beltway 2005, University Press of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
15. Bouteligier S. Exploring the agency of global environmental consultancy firms in earth system governance. International Environmental Agreements 2011, 11(February (1)):43-61.
16. Brown S., Burnham M., Delaney M., Powell M., Vaca R. Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: a case study of the Noel Kempff Climate Action Project in Bolivia. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2000, 5:99-121.
17. Brown S., Swingland I.R., Hanbury-Tenison R., Prance G.T., Myers N. Changes in the use and management of forests for abating carbon emissions: issues and challenges under the Kyoto Protocol. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 2002, 360:1593-1605.
18. Burt R.S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition 1995, Harvard University Press, New Haven, CT.
19. Burt R.S. Brockerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital 2005, Oxford University Press, New York.
20. Carpenter R.C. Governing the global agenda: "Gatekeepers" and "issue adoption" in transnational advocacy networks. Who Governs the Globe? 2010, 202-237. Cambridge University Press, New York, (Chapter 8). D.D. Avant, M. Finnemore, S.K. Sell (Eds.).
21. Carpenter R.C. Vetting the advocacy agenda: network centrality and the paradox of weapons norms. International Organization 2011, 65(February (1)):69-102.
22. Cash D.W., Adger W.N., Berkes F., Garden P., Lebel L., Olsson P., Pritchard L.J., Young O.R. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2):8.
23. Cenamo M.C., Pavan M.N., Campos M.T., Barros A.C., Carvalho F. Casebook of REDD projects in Latin America 2009, The Nature Conservancy, Washington, DC.
24. Center for International Forestry Research, 2012. Global database of REDD+ and other forest carbon projects interactive map. URL . http://www.forestclimatechange.org/redd-map/.
25. Cerbu G.A., Swallow B.M., Thompson D.Y. Locating REDD: a global survey and analysis of REDD readiness and demonstration activities. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14:168-180.
26. Chagas T., Streck C., O'Sullivan R., Olander J., Seifer-Granzin J. Nested Approaches to REDD+: An Overview of Issues and Options 2011, Forest Trends, Washington, DC.
27. Climate Action Network, 2005. Establish a formal work programme. ECO, 1, 4, November.
28. Climate Action Network, 2007. REDD hot! Climate Action Network, Danpassar, Bali, Indonesia, December.
29. Climate Community and Biodiversity Alliance, 2008. Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Project Design Standards. Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Alliance, Arlington, VA.
30. Corbera E. Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4(December (6)):612-619.
31. Crona B., Hubacek K. The right connections: how do social networks lubricate the machinery of natural resource governance?. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(4):18.
32. Csardi G., Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Systems 2006, 1695.
33. Di Gregorio M., Brockhaus M., Cronin T., Muharrom E. Politics and power in national REDD+ policy processes. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, 69-90. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, (Chapter 5). A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L.V. Verchot (Eds.).
34. Dryzek J.S. Democratization as deliberative capacity building. Comparative Political Studies 2009, 42(April (11)):1379-1402.
35. Dryzek J.S., Stevenson H. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics 2011, 70(September (11)):1865-1874.
36. Ecosystem Marketplace, 2012. Forest Carbon Portal. Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC. URL . http://www.forestcarbonportal.com/.
37. Faguet J.-P. Does decentralization increase government responsiveness to local needs?. Journal of Public Economics 2004, 88(March (3-4)):867-893.
38. Faguet J.-P. Decentralisation's effects on public investment: evidence and policy lessons from Bolivia and Colombia. Journal of Development Studies 2008, 44(September (8)):1100-1121.
39. Faguet J.-P. Governance from below in Bolivia: a theory of local government with two empirical tests. Latin American Politics and Society 2009, 51(November (4)):29-68.
40. Forest Carbon Asia, 2012. Forest Carbon Asia. Forest Carbon Asia, Manilla, Philippines. URL . http://www.forestcarbonasia.org/.
41. Forest Carbon Asia, 2012. Forest Carbon Projects. Forest Carbon Asia, Manilla, Philippines. URL . http://www.forestcarbonasia.org/activities/forest-carbon-projects/.
42. Forest Peoples Programme, Yayasan Pusaka, 2012. Unfulfilled promises: a note on the KFCP's recent attempts to respect the rights of affected communities on the Kapuas River, Central Kalimantan. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. URL . http://www.forestpeoples.org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2012/09/kfcp-commitments-after-year-promises-final_0.pdf.
43. Freeman L.C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 1977, 40(1):35-41.
44. Galaz V., Crona B., Österblom H., Olsson P., Folke C. Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries - emerging governance of climate change-ocean acidification-marine biodiversity. Ecological Economics 2012, 81(September):21-32.
45. Green J.F. Order out of chaos: public and private rules for managing carbon. Meeting of the American Political Science Association 2011, American Political Science Association, Seattle.
46. Green J.F. Sink the sinks?! Public and private regulation of carbon sinks in the climate change regime. Mershon Center for International Security Studies Globalization Speaker Series 2012, Mershon Center for International Security Studies, Columbus, OH.
47. Greenpeace International Bad Influence: How McKinsey-Inspired Plans Lead to Rainforest Destruction 2011, Greenpeace International, Amsterdam.
48. Greenpeace International Outsourcing hot air 2012, Greenpeace International, Amsterdam.
49. Grewal D.S. Network Power: The Social Dynamics of Globalization 2008, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
50. Gupta A., Lövbrand E., Turnhout E., Vijge M.J. In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4(December (6)):726-731.
51. Gupta J. Global forest and REDD+ governance: win-win or lose-lose?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4(December (6)):620-627.
52. Holling C.S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 2001, 4(August (5)):390-405.
53. Holling C.S., Gunderson L.H., Peterson G.D. Sustainability and panarchies. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems 2002, 63-102. Island Press, Washington, DC. L.H. Gunderson, C.S. Holling (Eds.).
54. Indrarto G.B., Murharjanti P., Khatarina J., Pulungan I., Ivalerina F., Rahman J., Prana M.N., Resosudarmo I.A.P., Muharrom E. The Context of REDD+ in Indonesia: Drivers, Agents, and Institutions 2012.
55. Kanowski P.J., McDermott C.L., Cashore B.W. Implementing REDD+: lessons from analysis of forest governance. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14(March (2)):111-117.
56. Kinsman J., Kaster G., Kuhn E., McIntyre R. Utility forest carbon management program/Utilitree Carbon Company. Energy Conversion and Management 1997, 38(Supplement):S563-S568.
57. Korhonen-Kurki K., Brockhaus M., Duchelle A.E., Atmadja S., Thuy P.T. Multiple levels and multiple challenges for REDD+. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, 91-110. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, (Chapter 6). A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L. Verchot (Eds.).
58. Lake D.A., Wong W.H. The politics of networks: interests, power, and human rights norms. Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance 2009, 127-150. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, (Chapter 7). M. Kahler (Ed.).
59. Larson A.M., Soto F. Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2008, 33(November (1)):213-239.
60. Li T.M. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics 2007, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
61. Lile, R., Powell, M., Toman, M., 1998. Implementing the Clean Development Mechanism: lessons from US private-sector participation in Activities Implemented Jointly.
62. McDermott C.L., Coad L., Helfgott A., Schroeder H. Operationalizing social safeguards in REDD+: actors, interests and ideas. Environmental Science & Policy 2012, 21(August):63-72.
63. McElwee P. Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem?. Geoforum 2011, 43(3):412-426.
64. McKinsey and Company, 2012. About Us: History. McKinsey and Company, New York. URL . http://www.mckinsey.com/About_us/History.
65. McKinsey and Company, 2012. Alumni. McKinsey and Company, New York. URL . http://www.mckinsey.com/alumni.
66. Milne S., Adams B. Market masquerades: uncovering the politics of community-level payments for environmental services in Cambodia. Development and Change 2012, 43(1):133-158.
67. Murdie A., Davis D.R. Looking in the mirror: comparing INGO networks across issue areas. Review of International Organizations 2011, 7(September (2)):177-202.
68. Mustalahti I., Bolin A. Can REDD+ reconcile local priorities and needs with global mitigation benefits? Lessons from Angai Forest, Tanzania. Ecology and Society 2012, 17(1).
69. Nagendra H., Ostrom E. Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. International Journal of the Commons 2012, 6(2):104-133.
70. Oestreicher J., Benessaiah K. Avoiding deforestation in Panamanian protected areas: an analysis of protection effectiveness and implications for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19:279-291.
71. Okereke C., Dooley K. Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation: towards a post-Kyoto climate agreement. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20:82-95.
72. Opsahl T. Structure and evolution of weighted networks 2009, University of London (Queen Mary College), (Ph.D. Thesis). URL http://toreopsahl.com/publications/thesis/.
73. Opsahl T., Agneessens F., Skvoretz J. Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Networks 2010, 32(July (3)):245-251.
74. Osterblom H., Bodin O. Global cooperation among diverse organizations to reduce illegal fishing in the southern ocean. Conservation Biology 2012, 26(August (4)):638-648.
75. Ostrom E. Scales, polycentricity, and incentives: designing complexity to govern complexity. Protection of Global Biodiversity: Converging Strategies 1998, 149-167. Duke University Press, Durham, NC. L.D. Guruswamy, J. McNeely (Eds.).
76. Ostrom E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 2010, 20(October (4)):550-557.
77. Ostrom E. Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales?. Economic Theory 2012, 49(August (2)):353-369.
78. Ostrom V., Tiebout C.M., Warren R. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 1961, 55(4):831-842.
79. Padwe J. Resolving land conflict along the border of the Mbaracayú Reserve, Paraguay. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies Bulletin 2002, 105:125-149.
80. Pedroni L., Dutschke M., Streck C., Porrúa M.E. Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach. Climate Policy 2009, 9(March (2)):207-220.
81. Peters-Stanley M., Hamilton K., Yin D. Leveraging the Landscape: State of the Forest Carbon Markets 2012 2012, Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC.
82. Phelps J., Webb E.L., Agrawal A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science 2010, 328(5976):312.
83. Pistorius T. From RED to REDD+: the evolution of a forest-based mitigation approach for developing countries. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2012, 4(December (6)):638-645.
84. PR Newswire, 1996. AEP Participates in new industry-wide effort to reduce global warming, AEP's Gary Kaster named chairman of new consortium. PR Newswire, August.
85. R Core Team, 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL . http://www.r-project.org.
86. REDD Offsets Working Group, 2013. Issue Workshops. REDD Offset Working Group, Sacremento, CA. URL . http://stateredd.org/recommendations/workshops/.
87. Resosudarmo I.A.P., Duchelle A.E., Ekaputri A.D., Sunderlin W.D. Local hopes and worries about REDD+ projects. Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices 2012, 193-208. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, (Chapter 11). A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W.D. Sunderlin, L. Verchot (Eds.).
88. Rudel T.K. Forest policy changes in the tropics: an emerging research priority. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18:253-255.
89. Sandbrook C., Nelson F., Adams W.M., Agrawal A. Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox. Oryx 2010, 44(July (3)):330-334.
90. Santilli M., Moutinho P., Schwartzman S., Nepstad D., Curran L., Nobre C. Tropical deforestation and the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change 2005, 71(August (3)):267-276.
91. Schroeder H. Agency in international climate negotiations: the case of indigenous peoples and avoided deforestation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 2010, 10(October (4)):317-332.
92. Scott J. Seeing like a State 1998, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
93. Skutsch M., Van Laake P.E. REDD as multi-level governance in-the-making. Energy & Environment 2008, 19(November (6)):831-844.
94. Thompson M.C., Baruah M., Carr E.R. Seeing REDD+ as project of environmental governance. Environmental Science & Policy 2011, 14:100-110.
95. Toni F. Decentralization and REDD+ in Brazil. Forests 2011, 66-85.
96. Varming, M., Seeberg-Elverfeldt, C., Tapio-Bistrom, M.-L., 2010. Agriculture, forestry and other land use mitigation project database: an assessment of the current status of land-based sectors in the carbon markets.
97. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
98. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis 2009, Springer, New York.
99. World Resources Institute, 2006. The AES Corporation. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. URL . http://pdf.wri.org/bell/case_1-56973-123-3_full_version_b_english.pdf.
100. Zelli F. The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2011, 2(March (2)):255-270.