Payments for environmental services as neoliberal market-based forest conservation in Vietnam: Panacea or problem?

Geoforum

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 412-426

  McElwee, Pamela D ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asia; Conservation; Forests; Land tenure; Payments for environmental services; Poverty; Reforestation; Vietnam

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DEFORESTATION; DEVELOPMENT PROJECT; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; LAND TENURE; NEOLIBERALISM; POVERTY; PRIVATIZATION; REFORESTATION; STATE ROLE;

VIET NAM;

EID: 84858149523     PISSN: 00167185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (174)

1. Adhikari, B., 2009. Market-Based Approaches to Environmental Management: Lessons from Payment for Environmental Services in Asia. Working Paper # 134, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
2. Altieri M., Rojas A. Ecological impacts of Chile's neoliberal policies, with special emphasis on agroecosystems. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1999, 1:55-72.
3. An, Pham Van, 2009. Implementation of policy on pilot payment for forest environment services in Lam Dong province, Viet Nam. In: Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, 29 June-1 July, 2009, Bangkok, Thailand.
4. ARBCP, 2009. Alternative livelihoods for improved biodiversity conservation. In: Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, Bangkok, Thailand, 29 June-1 July, 2009.
5. Asquith N., Vargas N.T., Wunder S. Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:675-684.
6. Bakker K. Neoliberalizing nature? Market environmentalism in water supply in England and Wales. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2005, 95(3):542-565.
7. Bakker K. The ambiguity of community: debating alternatives to private-sector provision of urban water supply. Water Alternatives 2008, 1(2):236-252.
8. Bakker, K., 2010. The limits of 'neoliberal natures': debating green neoliberalism. Progress in Human Geography. doi:10:1177/0309132510376849.
9. Barney K. Central Plans and Global Exports: Tracking Vietnam's Forestry Commodity Chains and Export Links to China 2005, Forest Trends, Washington, DC.
10. Borras S. Questioning market-led agrarian reform: experiences from Brazil, Colombia and South Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change 2003, 3(3):367-394.
11. Brenner N., Theodore N. Cities and the geographies of andquot; actually existing neoliberalismandquot; Antipode 2002, 34(3):349-379.
12. Brockington D., Duffy R., Igoe J. Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism, and the Future of Protected Areas 2008, Earthscan Publishers, London.
13. Bulte E., Lipper L., Stringer R., Zilberman D. Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues, and empirical perspectives. Environmental and Development Economics 2008, 13(3):245-254.
14. Bury J. Mining mountains: neoliberalism, land tenure, livelihoods, and the new Peruvian mining industry in Cajamarca. Environment and Planning A 2005, 37:221-239.
15. Buanddie;scher B. Conservation, neoliberalism, and social science: a critical reflection on the SCB 2007 annual meeting in South Africa. Conservation Biology 2008, 22(2):229-231.
16. Cam, Hoang, 2007. On Being 'Forest Thieves': State Resource Policies, Market Forces, and Struggles over Livelihood and Meaning of Nature in a Northwestern Valley of Vietnam. Working Paper Series 6, Chiang Mai University, Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development, Chiang Mai.
17. Castella J.C., Boissau S., Thanh Nguyen Hai, Novosad P. Impact of forestland allocation on land use in a mountainous province of Vietnam. Land Use Policy 2006, 23(2):147-160.
18. Castree N. Neoliberalising nature: the logics of deregulation and reregulation. Environment and Planning A 2008, 40:141-152.
19. Cerney P., Menz G., Soederberg S. Different roads to globalization: neoliberalism, the competition state, and politics in a more open world. Internalizing Globalization: The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism 2005, 1-30. Palgrave McMillan, Hampshire, UK. S. Soederberg, G. Menz, P. Cerny (Eds.).
20. Chomitz K., Brenes E., Constantino L. Financing environmental services: the Costa Rican experience and its implications. Science of the Total Environment 1999, 240:157-169.
21. Clement F., Amezaga J.M. Linking reforestation policies with land use change in northern Vietnam: why local factors matter. Geoforum 2008, 39(1):265-277.
22. Clement F., Amezaga J.M. Afforestation and forestry land allocation in northern Vietnam: analyzing the gap between policy intentions and outcomes. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:458-470.
23. Clements T., John A., Nielsen K., An D., Tan S., Milner-Gulland E.J. Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: comparison of three programs from Cambodia. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1283-1291.
24. Corbera E., Kosoy N., Tuna M.M. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change 2007, 17:365-380.
25. deKoninck, R., 1999. Deforestation in Vietnam. International Development Research Council, Ottawa, Canada.
26. Dixon C. Developmental lessons of the Vietnamese transitional economy. Progress in Development Studies 2003, 3(4):287-306.
27. Dixon C., Kilgour A. State, capital, and resistance to globalisation in the Vietnamese transitional economy. Environment and Planning A 2002, 34:599-618.
28. EIA, 2008. Borderlines: Vietnam's Booming Furniture Industry and Timber Smuggling in the Mekong Region. Environmental Investigation Agency, London.
29. Engel S., Palmer C. Payments for environmental services as an alternative to logging under weak property rights: the case of Indonesia. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:799-809.
30. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 2008, 65(1):663-674.
31. Estache A., Gomez-Lobo A., Leipziger D. Utilities privatization and the poor: lessons and evidence from Latin America. World Development 2001, 29(7):1179-1198.
32. Evans M., Hai Bui Duc Embedding neoliberalism through statecraft: the case of market reform in Vietnam. Internalizing Globalization: The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Decline of National Varieties of Capitalism 2005, 219-236. Palgrave McMillan, Hampshire, UK. S. Soederberg, G. Menz, P. Cerny (Eds.).
33. Evans, M., Gough, I., Harkness, Susan, McKay, A., Thanh, Huyen Dao, Le Thu, Ngoc Do, 2007. How Progressive is Social Security in Viet Nam? UNDP Vietnam, Hanoi.
34. Fortunel F. From collectivization to poverty: natives and state-owned enterprises in Vietnam's Central Highlands. Development and Dominion: Indigenous Peoples of Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos 2009, 397-409. White Lotus Press, Bangkok. F. Bourdier (Ed.).
35. FSSP, 2007. Viet Nam Forest Sector Indicators and 2005 Baseline Data Report. Forest Sector Support Partnership and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
36. Futemma C., Brondizio E. Land reform and land-use changes in the lower Amazon: implications for agricultural intensification. Human Ecology 2003, 31(3):369-402.
37. General Statistics Office of Vietnam, 2007. Results of the 2006 Rural, Agricultural and Fisheries Census. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi.
38. Goldman M. Tragedy of the commons or the commoners' tragedy: the state and ecological crisis in India. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 1993, 4(4):49-68.
39. Grieg-Gran M., Porras I., Wunder S. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development 2005, 33(9):1511-1527.
40. Ha Hoang Minh, Noordwijk M.Y., Thuy Pham Thu Payment for Environmental Services in Vietnam: Experiences and Lessons in Vietnam 2008, World Agroforestry Center, Hanoi.
41. Haglund L. Limiting Resources: Market-Led Reform and the Transformation of Public Goods 2010, Pennsylvania State Press, State College, PA.
42. Harvey D. The New Imperialism 2003, Oxford University Press, New York.
43. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
44. Hefner R. The Political Economy of Mountain Java 1990, University of California Press, Berkeley.
45. Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences 2007, Routledge, London. N. Heynen, J. McCarthy, S. Prudham, P. Robbins (Eds.).
46. Holland T., McNally R. REDD Working Papers. REDD and Sustainable Development-Perspective from Viet Nam 2010, IIED, London.
47. Humphreys D. Discourse as ideology: neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics 2009, 11:319-325.
48. Hung, Nguyen Sinh, 2010. Thong bao: Y kien ket luan cua Pho Thu tuong Nguyen Sinh Hung tai hoi nghi so ket chinh sach thi diem chi tra dich vu moi truong rung, theo Quyet dinh so 380/QD-TTg ngay 10 thang 4 nam 2008 cua Thu tuong Chinh phu. State Government Office, Hanoi.
49. Ibarra Geneandacute; E. The profitability of payments for environmental services (PES) in the Reserva Forestal Golfo Dulce, Costa Rica. Forest Policy and Economics 2007, 10(1-2):7-13.
50. Igoe J., Brockington D. Neoliberal conservation: a short introduction. Conservation and Society 2007, 5(3):432-449.
51. Igoe J., Neves K., Brockington D. A spectacular eco-tour around the historic bloc: theorising the convergence of biodiversity conservation and capitalist expansion. Antipode 2010, 42(3):486-512.
52. Jack, B., Kousky, C., Sims, K., 2008. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9465.
53. Jakobsen J., Rasmussen K., Leisz S., Folving R., Quang Nguyen Vinh The effects of land tenure policy on rural livelihoods and food sufficiency in the upland village of Que, North Central Vietnam. Agricultural Systems 2007, 94:309-319.
54. Jourdain D., Pandey S., Tai Do Anh, Quang Dang Dinh Payments for environmental services in upper-catchments of Vietnam: will it help the poorest?. International Journal of the Commons 2009, 3(1):64-81.
55. Karsenty A. Questioning rent for development swaps: new market- based instruments for biodiversity acquisition and the land-use issue in tropical countries. International Forestry Review 2007, 9(1):503-513.
56. Kerkvliet B.J. Village-state relations in Vietnam: the effect of everyday politics on decollectivization. Journal of Asian Studies 1995, 54(2):396-418.
57. Kerr J. Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India. World Development 2002, 30(8):1387-1400.
58. Kiss A., Ferraro P. Ecology: direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 2002, 298(5599):1718-1719.
59. Klepeis P., Vance C. Neoliberal policy and deforestation in southeastern Mexico: an assessment of the PROCAMPO program. Economic Geography 2003, 79(3):221-240.
60. Kosoy N., Corbera E. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1228-1236.
61. Leimona, B., Villamor, G., Noordwijk, M.v., Fauzi, A., Utaira, R., 2008. IFAD Grant Project TAG-534 Completion Report: Developing Mechanisms to Reward the Upland Poor in Asia for Environmental Services that They Provide. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Office, Bogor.
62. Lemos M.C., Agrawal A. Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2006, 31:297-325.
63. Li T.M. Marginality, power and production: analysing upland transformations. Transforming the Indonesian Uplands: Marginality, Power and Production 1999, 1-44. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam. T.M. Li (Ed.).
64. Li T.M. Local histories, global markets: cocoa and class in upland Sulawesi. Development and Change 2002, 33(3):415-437.
65. Li T.M. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 2007, 36(2):263-293.
66. Li T.M. Indigeneity, capitalism, and the management of dispossession. Current Anthropology 2010, 51(3):385-414.
67. Liljestrom R., Lindskog E., Ang Nguyen Van, Tinh Vuong Xuan Profit and Poverty in Rural Vietnam: Winners and Losers of a Dismantled Revolution 1998, Curzon, Surrey, UK.
68. Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., Chen, X., 2008. Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(28), 9477-9482.
69. Liverman D. Who governs, at what scale and at what price? Geography, environmental governance, and the commodification of nature. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2004, 94(4):734-738.
70. Liverman D., Vilas S. Neoliberalism and the environment in Latin America. Annual Reviews of Environment and Resources 2006, 31(1):327-363.
71. Loftus A.J., McDonald D.A. Of liquid dreams: a political ecology of water privatization in Buenos Aires. Environment and Urbanization 2001, 13(2):179-200.
72. London J. Rethinking Vietnam's mass education and health systems. Rethinking Viet Nam 2004, 127-142. Routledge Curzon, London. D. McCargo (Ed.).
73. Mai, Huynh Thi, 2009. Introduction on payments for environmental services in the Biodiversity Law. Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, Bangkok, Thailand, 29 June-1 July, 2009.
74. Maanddie;ler K., Aniyar S., Jansson aandring;. Accounting for ecosystem services as a way to understand the requirements for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(28):9501.
75. Mansfield B. Rules of privatization: contradictions in neoliberal regulation of North Pacific fisheries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2004, 94(3):565-584.
76. Mansfield B. Introduction: property and the remaking of nature-society relations. Privatization: Property and the Remaking of Nature-Society Relations 2008, 1-13. Blackwell, Malden, MA. B. Mansfield (Ed.).
77. MARD, 2008. Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Plan Idea Note (R-PIN): Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
78. MARD, 2010a. Decree 99/2010/ND-CP. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
79. MARD, 2010b. Dien Tich Rung Va Dat Lam Nghiep Toan Quoc; Ban hanh kem theo Quyet dinh so 2140/QD-BNN-TCLN ngay 09/8/2010. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
80. Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development 1988, Cornell University Press, Ithaca. D. Marr, C. White (Eds.).
81. McAfee K. Selling nature to save it? Biodiversity and green developmentalism. Environment and Planning D 1999, 17:133-154.
82. McAfee K., Shapiro E. Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the state. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 2010, 100(3):579-599.
83. McCarthy J., Prudham S. Neoliberal nature and the nature of neoliberalism. Geoforum 2004, 35:275-283.
84. The Age of Commodity: Water Privatization in Southern Africa 2005, Earthscan, London. D. McDonald, G. Ruiters (Eds.).
85. McElwee P. You say illegal, I say legal: the relationship between 'illegal' logging and land tenure, poverty, and forest use rights in Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2004, 19(1/2/3):97-135.
86. McElwee P. Forest environmental income in Vietnam: household socio-economic factors influencing forest use. Environmental Conservation 2008, 35(2):1-13.
87. McElwee P. Reforesting 'bare hills' in Vietnam: social and environmental consequences of the 5 Million Hectare Reforestation Program. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment 2009, 38(6):325-333.
88. McNally, R., 2010. Experience with REDD pilot projects in Viet Nam: SNV, ICRAF and JICA. In: Presentation at Katoomba XVII - Hanoi, Taking the Lead: Payments for Ecosystem Services in Southeast Asia, June 23-24, 2010, Hanoi, Vietnam. andlt;andgt; (accessed 10.10.10). http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/acrobat/k17/Richard%20McNally%20KatoombaSNV.pdf.
89. Mellac M. La gestion des espaces forestiers au Nord Vietnam: Un modeandgrave;le et son application. Cahiers d'Outre Mer 1998, 51(204):367-384.
90. Mertz O., Ravnborg H., Loanddie;vei G., Nielsen I. Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries. Biodiversity and Conservation 2007, 16(10):2729-2737.
91. Meyfroidt P., Lambin E.F. The causes of the reforestation in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 2008, 25:182-197.
92. Meyfroidt P., Lambin E.F. Forest transition in Vietnam and its environmental impacts. Global Change Biology 2008, 14:1-18.
93. Meyfroidt P., Lambin E.F. Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(38):16139-16144.
94. Morris A. Easing conservation? Conservation easements, public accountability and neoliberalism. Geoforum 2008, 39:1215-1227.
95. Morse W.C., Schedlbauer J.L., Sesnie S.E., Finegan B., Harvey C.A., Hollenhorst S.J., Kavanagh K.L., Stoian D., Wulfhorst J.D. Consequences of environmental service payments for forest retention and recruitment in a Costa Rican biological corridor. Ecology and Society 2009, 14(1):23. andlt;http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art23/andgt;.
96. Neef A., Thomas D. Rewarding the upland poor for saving the commons? Evidence from Southeast Asia. International Journal of the Commons 2009, 3(1):1-15.
97. Ngai, Nguyen Ba, Tan, Nguyen Quang, Sunderlin, W., Yasmi, Y., 2009. Forestry and Poverty Data in Viet Nam: Status, Gaps, and Potential Uses. RECOFT, Rights and Resources International, and Vietnam Forestry University, Hanoi.
98. Nguyen K.Q. Internalizing externalities into capacity expansion planning: the case of electricity in Vietnam. Energy 2008, 33:740-746.
99. O'Connor D. Governing the global commons: linking carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in tropical forests. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18(3):368-374.
100. Ogle A., Blakeney K.J., Hoe Hoang Natural Forest Management Practices 1998, Asian Development Bank, Hanoi.
101. Owusu H. Current convenience, desperate deforestation: Ghana's adjustment program and the forestry sector. The Professional Geographer 1998, 50(4):418-436.
102. Pagiola S., Rios A., Arcenas A. Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua. Environmental and Development Economics 2008, 13:299-325.
103. Peck J., Tickell A. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 2003, 34(3):380-404.
104. Perreault T. Popular protest and unpopular policies: state restructuring, resource conflict, and social justice in Bolivia. Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise, and Practice 2008, 239-262. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Carruthers (Ed.).
105. Perrot-Maiandcirc;tre D. The Vittel Payments for Ecosystem Services: A andquot; Perfectandquot; PES Case? 2006, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
106. Peters, J., 2008. The pilot payments for forest environmental services policy in Vietnam and PES pilot sites in the Dong Nai River Basin. In: Presentation to IWLEARN Regional Workshop on Payments for Environmental Services. andlt;andgt;. http://www.iwlearn.net/abt_iwlearn/events/pes-workshop-hanoi.
107. Petheram L., Campbell B.M. Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. Journal of Environmental Management 2010, 91(5):1139-1149.
108. Phelps J., Webb E.L., Agrawal A. Does REDD+ threaten to recentralize forest governance?. Science 2010, 328(5976):312-313.
109. Phu, Nguyen Tuan, 2009. The policy of Vietnam Government on pilot payment for forest environmental services. In: Presentation at South-East Asia Workshop on Payments for Ecosystem Services: Incentives for Improving Economic Policy, Biodiversity Conservation, and Natural Resource Management Target Performance, 29 June-1 July, 2009, Bangkok, Thailand.
110. Phuc, To Xuan, Santiago, C., 2010. Vietnam Leads Southeast Asia in Payments for Ecosystem Services. Katoomba Group Ecosystem Marketplace. andlt;andgt; (accessed 05.09.10). http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=7593andamp;section=news_articlesandamp;eod=1.
111. Pingali P.L., Khiem Nguyen Tri, Gerpacio R., Xuan Vo Tong Prospects for sustaining Vietnam's reacquired rice exporter status. Food Policy 1997, 22(4):345-358.
112. Pokorny B., Johnson J., Medina G., Hoch L. Market-based conservation of the Amazonian forests: revisiting win-win expectations. Geoforum 2010, 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.002.
113. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time 1957, Beacon Press, Boston. second ed.
114. Porras I., Grieg-Gran M., Neves N. All that Glitters: A Review of Payments for Watershed Services in Developing Countries. Natural Resource Issues No. 11 2008, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK.
115. Prudham S. Poisoning the well: neoliberalism and the contamination of municipal water in Walkerton, Ontario. Geoforum 2004, 35:343-359.
116. Prudham S. The fictions of autonomous invention: accumulation by dispossession, commodification, and life patents in Canada. Privatization: Property and the Remaking of Nature-Society Relations 2008, 14-37. Blackwell, Malden, MA. B. Mansfield (Ed.).
117. Robertson M. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance. Geoforum 2004, 35(3):361-373.
118. Robertson M. The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2006, 24(3):367-387.
119. Rojas M., Aylward B. Cooperation between a Small Private Hydropower Producer and a Conservation NGO for Forest Protection: The Case of La Esperanza, Costa Rica, Land-Water Linkages in Rural Watersheds Case Study Series 2002, FAO, Rome.
120. Rowcroft P. Frontiers of change: the reasons behind land-use change in the Mekong Basin. Ambio 2008, 37(3):213-218.
121. Sandewall M., Ohlsson B., Sandewall R., Viet Le Sy The expansion of farm-based plantation forestry in Vietnam. Ambio 2010, 10.1007/s13280-010-0089-1.
122. Shanks, E., O'Reilly, S., 2005. Enhancing the Poverty Reduction Focus of Forest Sector Strategies, Policies and Management Practices in Vietnam. Report for the World Bank, March 2005, Hanoi.
123. Shimamoto M., Ubukata F., Seki Y. Forest sustainability and the free trade of forest products: cases from Southeast Asia. Ecological Economics 2004, 50(1-2):23-34.
124. Sierra R., Russman E. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: a forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 2006, 59(1):131-141.
125. Sikor T. Decree 327 and the restoration of barren land in the Vietnamese highlands. The Challenges of Highland Development in Vietnam 1995, East West Center, Honolulu. A.T. Rambo, R. Reed, L.T. Cuc, M. Digregorio (Eds.).
126. Sikor T. The allocation of forestry land in Vietnam: did it cause the expansion of forests in the northwest?. Forest Policy and Economics 2001, 2:1-11.
127. Sikor T. Local government in the exercise of state power: the politics of land allocation in Black Thai villages. Beyond Hanoi: Local Government in Vietnam 2004, 171-200. Institute for Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore. B.T. Kerkvliet, D.G. Marr (Eds.).
128. Sikor T., Tan Nguyen Quang Why may forest devolution not benefit the rural poor? Forest entitlements in Vietnam's Central Highlands. World Development 2007, 35:2010-2025.
129. Sikor T., Thanh Tran Ngoc Exclusive versus inclusive devolution in forest management: insights from forest land allocation in Vietnam's Central Highlands. Land Use Policy 2007, 24(4):644-653.
130. Sjoanddie;holm F. State Owned Enterprises and Equitization in Vietnam. Working Paper 228 2006, European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm.
131. SNV, 2010. Deforestation Drivers and Community Assessment: Tien Hoang and Dong Nai Thuong Communes. Netherlands Development Organization, Hanoi.
132. Sowerwine J. Territorialisation and the politics of highland landscapes in Vietnam: negotiating property relations in policy, meaning and practice. Conservation and Society 2004, 2(1):97-136.
133. Spronk S., Webber J. Struggles against accumulation by dispossession in Bolivia: the political economy of natural resource contention. Latin American Perspectives 2007, 34(2):31-47.
134. SRV, 1992. Lieu Thong Ke Nong, Lam, Ngu Nghiep Viet Nam (1976-1991). NXB Thong Ke, Hanoi.
135. SRV, 1999. Decision of the Government No. 187 QD-TTg on the Renovation of Organization and Mechanisms for Management of State Forest Enterprises. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
136. SRV, 2000. Guidance for Implementation of the Decision 187/1999/QD-TTg of 16 September 1999 by the Prime Minister on Reform of Organization and Management Mechanism of State Forest Enterprises (SFE). Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development and Ministry of Finance, Hanoi.
137. Sunderlin W.D., Ba Huynh Thu Poverty Alleviation and Forests in Vietnam 2005, CIFOR, Bogor.
138. Swinkels, R., Turk, C. 2006. Explaining Ethnic Minority Poverty in Viet Nam: A Summary of Recent Trends and Current Challenges. Background paper for Ministry of Planning and Investment Meeting on Ethnic Minority Poverty, Hanoi, September.
139. Tallis H., Kareiva P., Marvier M., Chang A. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008, 105(28):9457-9464.
140. Tan Nguyen Quang Forest devolution in Vietnam: differentiation in benefits from forest among local households. Forest Policy and Economics 2006, 8:409-420.
141. Tan Nguyen Quang The household economy and decentralization of forest management in Vietnam. Lessons from Forest Decentralization: Money, Justice and the Quest for Good Governance in Asia-Pacific 2008, 187-209. Earthscan/CIFOR, London. C.J.P. Colfer, G.R. Dahal, D. Capistrano (Eds.).
142. Tan, Nguyen Quang, Ngai, Nguyen Ba, Thanh, Tran Ngoc, Sunderlin, W., Yasmi, Y., 2008. Forest Tenure Reform in Vietnam: Case studies from the Northern Upland and Central Highland Regions. RECOFT, RRI, and Vietnam Forestry University, Hanoi.
143. Thanh, Nguyen Chi, Hess, J., 2010. Contributions of Winrock international and GTZ to the formulation and implementation of policy on payment for forest environmental services in Viet Nam. In: Presentation at Katoomba XVII - Hanoi, Taking the Lead: Payments for Ecosystem Services in Southeast Asia, June 23-24, 2010, Hanoi, Vietnam. andlt;andgt; (accessed 10.10.10). http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/acrobat/k17/Nguyen%20Chi%20Thanh,%20Juergen%20Hess%20%20Winrock%20and%20GTZ%20in%20PFES%20for%20Viet%20Nam.pdf.
144. The Bui Dung, Ngoc Hong Bich Payments for environmental services in Vietnam: an empirical experiment in sustainable forest management. ASEAN Economic Bulletin 2008, 25(1):48-59.
145. The Bui Dung, Ha Dang Thanh, Chinh Nguyen Quoc Rewarding Upland Farmers for Environmental Services: Experience, Constraints and Potential in Vietnam 2004, IFAD/SIDA, Hanoi.
146. Thiha, Webb E.L., Honda K. Biophysical and policy drivers of landscape change in a central Vietnamese district. Environmental Conservation 2007, 34(2):164-172.
147. Tho, Ngo Dinh, Phuong, Pham Xuan, Nho, Bui Huy, Tuynh, Nguyen Huu, (Eds.), 2006. Cam nang nganh lam nghiep: chuong quan ly lam truong quoc doanh. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
148. Thomas, B., 2010. Vietnam may Spur Privatization after and#x0024;4.5 billion Shipyard Debt. Bloomberg Businessweek, August 08, 2010.
149. Thuan Dinh Duc Forestry, Poverty Reduction and Rural Livelihoods in Vietnam 2005, MARD Forest Sector Support Programme, Hanoi.
150. Thuy Pham Thu, Ha Hoang Minh, Campbell B.M. Pro-poor payments for environmental services: challenges for the government and administrative agencies in Vietnam. Public Administration and Development 2008, 28(5):363-373.
151. Thuy Pham Thu, Campbell B.M., Garnett S. Lessons for pro-poor payments for environmental services: an analysis of projects in Vietnam. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 2009, 31(2):117-133.
152. Thuy Pham Thu, Campbell B.M., Garnett S., Aslin H., Ha Hoang Minh Importance and impacts of intermediary boundary organizations in facilitating payment for environmental services in Vietnam. Environmental Conservation 2010, 37(1):64-72.
153. Turner R., Daily G. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics 2008, 39(1):25-35.
154. Turner S., Michaud J. Imaginative and adaptive economic strategies for Hmong livelihoods in Lao Cai province, Northern Vietnam. Journal of Vietnamese Studies 2008, 3(3):158-190.
155. UNHCR, 2002. Vietnam: Indigenous Minority Groups in the Central Highlands. UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva.
156. UN-REDD, 2010. Design of a REDD Compliant Benefit Distribution System for Viet Nam. UN-REDD, Hanoi.
157. USAID, 2009. Lam Dong Province Records First Hydropower Payments for Forest Conservation Under Pilot Environmental Services Policy. andlt;andgt; (accessed 05.09.10). http://vietnam.usaid.gov/?q=node/59.
158. Van Hecken G., Bastiaensen J. Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environmental Science and Policy 2010, 13:785-792.
159. Vatn A. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 2010, 69:1245-1252.
160. VietNamNet, 2010. General Warns against Turning over Forests to Foreign Investors, March 12, 2010. andlt;andgt; (accessed 05.09.10). http://www.vfej.vn/en/detail/22022/general_warns_against_turning_over_forests_to_foreign_investors.
161. Wertz-Kanounnikoff S., Rankine H. How can Governments Promote Strategic Approaches to Payments for Environmental Services (PES)? An Exploratory Analysis for the Case of Viet Nam, Analyses IDDRI No. 3 2008, IDDRI, Paris.
162. Wilshusen P. The receiving end of reform: everyday responses to neoliberalization in Southeastern Mexico. Antipode 2010, 42(3):767-799.
163. Win, T.L., 2009. Selling Nature to Preserve it Catches on in SE Asia. Reuters Alternet, 8 July. andlt;andgt; (assessed 09.03.11). http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/selling-nature-to-protect-it-catches-on-in-se-asia.
164. World Bank, 2005. State Forest Enterprise Reform in Vietnam. Rural Development and Natural Resources Division, World Bank, Washington, DC.
165. World Bank, 2009. Country Social Analysis: Ethnicity and Development in Vietnam. Social Development Department, World Bank, Washington DC.
166. World Bank, 2010a. Aligning Public Spending with Strategic Priorities in the Forestry Sector. Social, Environment and Rural Sustainable Development Unit (EASER), Sustainable Development Department, East Asia and Pacific Region, World Bank, Washington, DC.
167. World Bank, 2010b. Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Forest Law Enforcement and Governance. Social, Environment and Rural Sustainable Development Unit (EASER), Sustainable Development Department, East Asia and Pacific Region, World Bank, Washington, DC.
168. Wunder S. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Bolts 2005, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.
169. Wunder S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 2007, 21(1):48-58.
170. Wunder S. Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence. Environmental and Development Economics 2008, 13:279-297.
171. Wunder S., The Bui Dung, Ibarra E. Payment is Good, Control is Better: Why Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam Have So Far Remained Incipient 2005, CIFOR Bogor, Indonesia.
172. Wunder S., Engel S., Pagiola S. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 2008, 65:834-852.
173. Wuanddie;nscher T., Engel S., Wunder S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: increasing efficiency through spatial differentiation. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 2006, 45(4):319-337.
174. Zbinden S., Lee D. Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA Program. World Development 2005, 33(2):255-272.