On the relationship between the execution, perception, and imagination of action

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 257, Issue , 2013, Pages 242-252

  Wong, Lokman ^a   Manson, Gerome A ^a   Tremblay, Luc ^a   Welsh, Timothy N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Common coding; Imagination; Perception; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGINATION; LIMB MOVEMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COMMON CODING; IMAGINATION; PERCEPTION; SIMULATION;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84886628127     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.045     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. James W. The Principles of Psychology 1890, 1. Holt, New York.
2. Chandrasekharan S., Binsted G., Ayres F., Higgins L., Welsh T.N. Factors that affect action possibility judgments: recent experience with action and current body state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2012, 65:976-993.
3. Young S.J., Pratt J., Chau T. Choosing the fastest movement: perceiving speed-accuracy tradeoffs. Experimental Brain Research 2008, 185:681-688.
4. Hommel B. Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research 2009, 73:512-526.
5. Prinz W. Perception action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154.
6. Grosjean M., Shiffrar M., Knoblich G. Fitts's law holds for action perception. Psychological Science 2007, 18:95-99.
7. Elsner B., Hommel B. Effect anticipation action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2001, 27:229-240.
8. Kunde W., Hoffmann J., Zellmann P. The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica 2002, 109:137-155.
9. Chandrasekheran S., Wong L., Welsh T. Factors that affect action possibility judgements: the assumed abilities of other people. Acta Psychologica 2013, 143:235-244.
10. Sebanz N., Knoblich G. Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science 2009, 1:353-367.
11. Kiernan D., Ray M., Welsh T.N. Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2012, 19:914-920.
12. van der Wel R.P.R.D., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. Action perception from a common coding perspective. People watching: social, perceptual, and neurophysiological studies of body perception 2013, 101-120. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. K. Johnson, M. Shiffrar (Eds.).
13. Eskenazi T., Rotshtein P., Grosjean M., Knoblich G. The neural correlates of Fitts's law in action observation: an fMRI study. Social Neuroscience 2012, 7:30-41.
14. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology 1995, 73:2608-2611.
15. Clark S., Tremblay F., Ste-Marie D. Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:105-112.
16. Aglioti S.M., Cesari P., Romani M., Urgesi C. Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:1109-1116.
17. Calvo-Merino B., Glaser D.E., Grezes J., Passingham R.E., Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:1243-1249.
18. Urgesi C., Maieron M., Avenanti A., Tidoni E., Fabbro F., Aglioti S.M. Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. Cerebral Cortex 2010, 20:2511-2521.
19. Villiger M., Chandrasekharan S., Welsh T.N. Activity of human motor system during action observation is modulated by object presence. Experimental Brain Research 2011, 209:85-93.
20. Lotze M., Scheler G., Tan H.R., Braun C., Birbaumer N. The musician's brain: functional imaging of amateurs and professionals during performance and imagery. Neuroimage 2003, 20(3):1817-1829.
21. Maslovat D., Chua R., Hodges N. When unintended movements "leak" out: a startling acoustic stimulus can elicit a prepared response during motor imagery and action observation. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:838-844.
22. Munzert J., Lorey B., Zentgraf K. Cognitive motor processes: the role of motor imagery in the study of motor representations. Brain Research Reviews 2009, 60:306-326.
23. Fitts P. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1954, 47:381-391.
24. Decety J., Jeannerod M. Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts's law hold in motor imagery?. Behavioural Brain Research 1995, 72:127-134.
25. Sirigu A., Cohen L., Duhamel J.R., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y., Pierrot- Deseilligny C. Congruent unilateral impairments for real and imagined hand movements. Neuroreport 1995, 6:997-1001.
26. Wexler M., Kosslyn S.M., Berthoz A. Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition 1995, 68:77-94.
27. Wohlschlager A., Wohlschlager A. Mental and manual rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:397-412.
28. Wexler M., van Boxtel J. Depth perception by the active observer. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:431-438.
29. Eskenazi T., Grosjean M., Humphreys G.W., Knoblich G. The role of motor simulation in action perception: a neuropsychological case study. Psychological Research 2009, 73:477-485.
30. Zar J. Biostatistical Analysis 1984, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 2nd ed.
31. Ramenzoni V., Riley M.A., Davis T., Shockley K., Armstrong R. Tuning in to another person's action capabilities: perceiving maximal jumping-reach height from walking kinematics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:919-928.
32. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.R., Cohen L., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y. The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 1996, 273:1564-1568.
33. Cerritelli B., Maruff P., Wilson P., Currie J. The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research 2000, 108:91-96.
34. Maruff P., Wilson P.H., De Fazio J., Cerritelli B., Hedt A., Currie J. Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands in real and imagined motor task performance. Neuropsychologia 1999, 37:379-384.
35. Young S.J., Pratt J., Chau T. Misperceiving the speed-accuracy tradeoff: imagined movements and perceptual decisions. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 192:121-132.
36. Munzert J. Does level of expertise influence imagined durations in open skills? Played versus imagined durations of badminton sequences. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2008, 6:24-38.
37. Reed C.L. Chronometric comparisons of imagery to action: visualizing versus physically performing springboard dives. Memory & Cognition 2002, 30:1169-1178.
38. Grush R. The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004, 27:377-396.