Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 914-920

  Kiernan, Dovin ^a   Ray, Matthew ^a   Welsh, Timothy N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Motor planning programming; Social cognition; Stimulus response compatibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866748675     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0283-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2011). How "social" is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 84.
2. Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114, 348-355. doi: 10. 1016/j. cognition. 2009. 10. 008.
3. Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270-279. doi: 10. 1007/BF00419687.
4. Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794-798.
5. Iani, C., Anelli, F., Nicoletti, R., Arcuri, L., & Rubichi, S. (2011). The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 439-445.
6. Kuhbandner, C., Pekrun, R., & Maier, M. A. (2010). The role of positive and negative affect in the "mirroring" of other persons actions. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1182-1190.
7. Lam, M. Y., & Chua, R. (2010). Influence of stimulus-response assignment on the joint-action correspondence effect. Psychological Research, 74, 476-480.
8. Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129-154. doi: 10. 1080/713752551.
9. Ray, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2011). Response selection during a joint action task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43, 329-332.
10. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353-367. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1756-8765. 2009. 01024. x.
11. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11-B21.
12. Tsai, C. C., & Brass, M. (2007). Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio's actions? Coacting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychological Science, 18, 1058-1062. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1467-9280. 2007. 02025. x.
13. Tsai, C. C., Kuo, W. J., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. (2008). Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2015-2024.
14. van der Wel, R. P. R. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Let the force be with us: Dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1420-1431. doi: 10. 1037/a0022337.
15. Weeks, D., Proctor, R. W., & Beyak, B. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility for vertically oriented stimuli and horizontally oriented responses: Evidence for spatial coding. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 367-383.
16. Welsh, T. N., Elliot, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred's action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385, 99-104.
17. Welsh, T. N., Higgins, L., Ray, M., & Weeks, D. J. (2007). Seeing vs. believing: Is believing sufficient to activate the processes of response co-representation? Human Movement Science, 26, 853-866.
18. Welsh, T. N., Kiernan, D., Neyedli, H. F., Ray, M., Pratt, J., Potruff, A., & Weeks, D. J. (2012). Joint Simon effects in extrapersonal space. Journal of Motor Behavoir. (accepted).