The repair of trust: Insights from organizational behavior and social psychology

Social Psychology and Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 211-230

  Dirks, Kurt T ^a   De Cremer, David ^b,c,d  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c LONDON BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886329784     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Bottom, W P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions ofintent in rebuilding cooperation. Organization Science, 13, 497-513.
2. CNN/Opinion Research Corporation (2009). Poll: Politicians trusted more than business leaders on economy. CNNPolitics.com. February 23.
3. Conway, N., & Briner, R.B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 287-302.
4. De Cremer, D. (2004). The influence of accuracy as a function of leader's bias: The role of trustworthiness in the psychology of procedural justice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 293-304.
5. De Cremer, D. (2009). Trust repair and power dynamics in bargaining: When punishment versus rewards promote trust. Unpublished paper, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, the Netherlands.
6. De Cremer, D., & Schouten, B. (2008). When apologies for injustice matter: The role of respect. European Psychologist, 13, 239-247.
7. De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & Dewitte, S. (2001). The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)? The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 93-107.
8. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T R. (2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 639-649.
9. De Jong, B. A., & Elfring, T. (in press). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing work teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring and effort. Academy of Management Journal.
10. Desmet, P. T. M., De Cremer, D., & van Dijk, E. (2008). In money we trust? When financial compensations matter in repairing trust perceptions. Working paper, Rotterdam School of Management, the Netherlands.
11. Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 445-455.
12. Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 1004-1012.
13. Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
14. Dirks, K. T., Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., & Cooper, C. D. (2009). Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression. Working paper. Washington University, St. Louis, MO.
15. Dirks, K. T, Lewicki, R. J., & Zaheer, A. (2009). Repairing relationships within and between organizations: Building a conceptual foundation. Academy of Management Review, 34, 68-84.
16. Dirks, K. T., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2009). The relationship between being perceived as trustworthy by coworkers and individual performance. Journal of Management, 35, 136-157.
17. Ferrin, D. L., Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T (2007). Silence speaks volumes: The effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 893-908.
18. Gilbert, D. T (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107-119.
19. Gillespie, N., & Dietz, G. (2009). Trust repair after organization-level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34, 127-145.
20. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
21. Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
22. Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., & Cooper, C. D. (2009). The repair of trust: A dynamic bi-lateral perspective and multi-level conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 34, 401-422.
23. Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- vs. integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 49-65.
24. Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology vs. denial for repairing competence- vs. integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 104-118.
25. Kramer, R. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598.
26. Langfred, C. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385-399.
27. Lewicki, R., & Bunker, B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In R. Kramer & T Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations (pp. 114-139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Lount, R. B., Jr., Zhong, C. B., Sivanathan, N., & Murnighan, J. K. (2008). Getting off on the wrong foot: The timing of a breach and the restoration of trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1601-1612.
29. Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
30. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
31. National Leadership Index. (2008). Harvard Kennedy School. Center for Public Leadership. Cambridge, MA.
32. Overbeck, J. R., Tiedens, L. Z., & Brion, S. (2006). The powerful want to, the powerless have to: Perceived constraint moderates causal attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 479-496.
33. Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Brinol, P., & Jarvis, W B. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 21-41.
34. Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
35. Ren, H., & Gray, B. (2009). Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy o f Management Review, 34, 105-126.
36. Riordan, C. A., Marlin, N. A., & Kellogg, R. T. (1983). The effectiveness of accounts following transgression. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 213-219.
37. Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 245-259.
38. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
39. Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (2007). An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Review, 32, 344-354.
40. Schweitzer, M. E., Hershey, J. C., & Bradlow, E. (2006). Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 1-19.
41. Shaw, J. C., Wild, E., & Colquitt, J. A. (2003). To justify or excuse? A meta-analytic review of the effects of explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 444-458.
42. Sigal, J., Hsu, L., Foodim, S., & Betman, J. (1988). Factors affecting perceptions of political candidates accused of sexual and financial misconduct. Political Psychology, 9, 273-280.
43. Swann, W B. (1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038-1051.
44. Tomlinson, E., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34, 85-104.
45. Watson, Wyatt (2007). WorkUSA 2006/2007. Research report, Arlington, VA.
46. Weber, J. M., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2005). Normal acts of irrational trust: Motivated attributions and the trust development process. In B. Staw & R. Kramer (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 26, 75-101). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
47. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: SpringerVerlag.