The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction

Trials

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Zhong, Toni ^a,b   Temple Oberle, Claire ^c   Hofer, Stefan ^a,b   Beber, Brett ^b,d   Semple, John ^b,d   Brown, Mitchell ^b,d   Macadam, Sheina ^e   Lennox, Peter ^e   Panzarella, Tony ^a   McCarthy, Colleen ^f   Baxter, Nancy ^g   Butler, Catherine ^a   Causarano, Natalie ^a   Choi, Joline ^h   Webb, Carmen ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c TOM BAKER CANCER CENTRE   (Canada)

^d WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^f MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^g ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^h VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Acellular dermal matrix; Breast reconstruction; Implant; One stage; Tissue expander

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX; ADULT; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST Q; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TISSUE EXPANDER; CANADA; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NIPPLE SPARING MASTECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PHOTOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SILICONE BREAST IMPLANT; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SKIN SPARING MASTECTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ACELLULAR DERMIS; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANADA; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; NEOPLASM STAGING; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE EXPANSION DEVICES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84886116728     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-356     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Balch CM, Jacobs LK. Mastectomies on the rise for breast cancer: " the tide is changing" Ann Surg Oncol 2009, 16:2669-2672. 10.1245/s10434-009-0634-y, 2749168, 19644723.
2. Arrington AK, Jarosek SL, Virnig BA, Habermann EB, Tuttle TM. Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with increased use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2009, 16:2697-2704. 10.1245/s10434-009-0641-z, 19653045.
3. Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L, Stephens J, Farrar WB, Agnese DM. Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: an increasing trend at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 2009, 16:2691-2696. 10.1245/s10434-009-0547-9, 19506956.
4. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, Meade T, Parbhoo J, Mathias M, Shamehdi C, Davis M, Ramos D, Cox CE. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2009, 16:2682-2690. 10.1245/s10434-009-0635-x, 19653046.
5. Noone RB, Frazier TG, Noone GC, Blanchet NP, Murphy JB, Rose D. Recurrence of breast carcinoma following immediate reconstruction: a 13-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994, 93:96-9106. 10.1097/00006534-199401000-00014, 8278489.
6. Singletary SE. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 1996, 3:411-416. 10.1007/BF02305673, 8790856.
7. Eberlein TJ, Crespo LD, Smith BL, Hergrueter CA, Douville L, Eriksson E. Prospective evaluation of immediate reconstruction after mastectomy. Ann Surg 1993, 218:29-36. 10.1097/00000658-199307000-00006, 1242897, 8328826.
8. Johnson CH, van Heerden JA, Donohue JH, Martin JK, Jackson IT, Ilstrup DM. Oncological aspects of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy for malignancy. Arch Surg 1989, 124:819-823. 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410070073015, 2545180.
9. Huang CJ, Hou MF, Lin SD, Chuang HY, Huang MY, Fu OY, Lian SL. Comparison of local recurrence and distant metastases between breast cancer patients after postmastectomy radiotherapy with and without immediate TRAM flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 118:1079-1086. 10.1097/01.prs.0000220527.35442.44, 17016170.
10. Platt J, Baxter N, Zhong T. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. CMAJ 2011, 183:2109-2116. 10.1503/cmaj.110513, 3255143, 22065359.
11. Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, Kuhn LE, Davis J, Wilkins EG. Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg 2008, 247:1019-1028. 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181728a5c, 18520230.
12. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, Goldfarb S, Izenberg PH, Houin HP, Shaheen KW. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 106:1014-1025. 10.1097/00006534-200010000-00010, 11039373.
13. Morrow M, Bucci C, Rademaker A. Medical contraindications are not a major factor in the underutilization of breast conserving therapy. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 186:269-274. 10.1016/S1072-7515(97)00153-1, 9510257.
14. American Society of Plastic Surgeons Plastic Surgery Resources, Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons http://www.plasticsurgery.org, American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
15. Spear SL, Willey SC, Robb GL, Hammond DC, Nahabedian MY. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art 2007, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Williams, 2.
16. Cordeiro PG. Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1590-1601. 10.1056/NEJMct0802899, 18843123.
17. Plant MA, Scilley CG, Speechley M. Single-stage immediate breast reconstruction using a skin-sparing incision and definitive saline implants compared with a two-stage reconstruction using tissue expansion plus implants. Can J Plast Surg 2009, 17:117-123. 2827277, 21119841.
18. Nava MB, Cortinovis U, Ottolenghi J, Riggio E, Pennati A, Catanuto G, Greco M, Rovere GQ. Skin-reducing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 118:603-610. 10.1097/01.prs.0000233024.08392.14, 16932166.
19. Gamboa-Bobadilla GM. Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 2006, 56:22-25. 10.1097/01.sap.0000185460.31188.c1, 16374090.
20. Salzberg CA. Nonexpansive immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular tissue matrix graft (AlloDerm). Ann Plast Surg 2006, 57:1-5. 10.1097/01.sap.0000214873.13102.9f, 16799299.
21. Zienowicz RJ, Karacaoglu E. Implant-based breast reconstruction with allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007, 120:373-381. 10.1097/01.prs.0000267340.31742.1, 17632337.
22. Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007, 59:250-255. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802f8426, 17721209.
23. Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM, Chabner-Thompson E. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 127:514-524. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318200a961, 21285756.
24. Liu AS, Kao HK, Reish RG, Hergrueter CA, May JW, Guo L. Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 127:1755-1762. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf233, 21228744.
25. Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, Lipsitz S, Morris D, Kenney P, Eriksson E. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 125:429-436. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90, 20124828.
26. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part I. A prospective analysis of early complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 118:825-831. 10.1097/01.prs.0000232362.82402.e8, 16980842.
27. Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A single surgeon's 12-year experience with tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: part II. An analysis of long-term complications, aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006, 118:832-839. 10.1097/01.prs.0000232397.14818.0e, 16980843.
28. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009, 124:345-353. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807, 19644246.
29. Fortin AJ, Cheang M, Latosinsky S. Cosmetic outcomes following breast conservation therapy: in search of a reliable scale. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006, 100:65-70. 10.1007/s10549-006-9223-y, 16819568.
30. Lowery JC, Wilkins EG, Kuzon WM, Davis JA. Evaluations of aesthetic results in breast reconstruction: an analysis of reliability. Ann Plast Surg 1996, 36:601-606. 10.1097/00000637-199606000-00007, 8792969.
31. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, Kuhn L, Hawley ST, Wilkins E, Alderman AK. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship Period. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009, 124:1-8.
32. McCarthy CM, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Scott A, Vanlaeken N, Lennox PA, Alderman AK, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Pusic AL. Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants. Cancer 2010, 116:5584-5591. 10.1002/cncr.25552, 21136577.
33. Zhong T, McCarthy C, Min S, Zhang J, Beber B, Pusic AL, Hofer SO. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes. Cancer 2012, 118:1701-1709. 10.1002/cncr.26417, 22025176.
34. Macadam SA, Ho AL, Cook EF, Lennox PA, Pusic AL. Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: patient-reported outcomes among saline and silicone implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 125:761-771. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181cb5cf8, 20009795.
35. Collins KK, Liu Y, Schootman M, Aft R, Yan Y, Dean G, Eilers M, Jeffe DB. Effects of breast cancer surgery and surgical side effects on body image over time. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011, 126:167-176. 10.1007/s10549-010-1077-7, 3265936, 20686836.
36. Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Bjorklund T, Rylander R, Lagergren J, Jurell G, Wickman M, Sandelin K. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 2005, 14:201-208. 10.1016/j.breast.2004.10.008, 15927829.
37. Friedman LM, DeMets DL, Furberg C. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials 1996, St Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, 3.
38. Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 2005, 55:232-239. 10.1097/01.sap.0000168527.52472.3c, 16106158.
39. Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 128:1170-1178. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c2f6, 22094736.
40. Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen JJ, Arora BP, Katz SM, Gelfand MA, Khan SU, Dagum AB, Bui DT. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2010, 64:674-678.
41. Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012, 129:1049-1058. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824a2acb, 22544088.
42. Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, Shirvanian V, Da Lio A, Lipa JE, Crisera C, Festekjian JH. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011, 128:403e-410e. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b6637, 22030500.
43. Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012, 130:44S-53S.
44. Gurunluoglu R, Gurunluoglu A, Williams SA, Tebockhorst S. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010. Ann Plast Surg 2013, 70:103-110. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822ed5ce, 21862916.
45. Buxton M. Problems in the economic appraisal of new health technology: the evaluation of heart transplants in the UK. Economic Appraisal of Health Technology in the European Community 1987, 103-108. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, Drummond MF.