The relation between teachers' diagnostic sensitivity, their instructional activities, and their students' achievement gains in reading

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 283-293

  Behrmann, Lars ^a   Souvignier, Elmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Conditional effectiveness; Diagnostic competencies; Instructional quality; Reading achievement; Teacher judgment accuracy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886049831     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000112     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anders, Y., Kunter, M., Brunner, M., Krauss, S. & Baumert, J. (2010). Diagnostische Fähigkeiten von Mathematiklehrkräften und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Leistungen ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler [Mathematics teachers' diagnostic skills and their impact on students' achievements]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 57, 175-193. doi: 10.2378/peu2010.art13d
2. Artelt, C., Stanat, P., Schneider, W. & Schiefele, U. (2001). Lesekompetenz: Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse [Reading competencies: test conception and results]. In Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Eds.), PISA 2000-Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (S. 69-137). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
3. Asparouhov, T. & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Multiple imputation with Mplus. Retrieved March 28, 2012, from http://www.statmodel.com
4. Bates, C. & Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers' judgements of reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 21, 177-187. doi: 10.1080/01443410020043878
5. Baumert, J. & Kunter, M. (2006) Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften [Professional competencies of teachers]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9, 469-520. doi: 10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2
6. Begeny, J. C. & Buchanan, H. (2010). Teachers' judgments of students' early literacy skills measured by the Early Literacy Skills Assessment: Comparisons of teachers with and without assessment administration experience. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 859-868. doi: 10.1002/pits
7. Begeny, J. C., Eckert, T. L., Montarello, S. A. & Storie, M. S. (2008). Teachers' perceptions of students' reading abilities: An examination of the relationship between teachers' judgments and students' performance across a continuum of rating methods. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 43-55. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.43
8. Brophy, J. E. (2000). Teaching (Educational Practices Series, Vol.1). Retrieved April 02, 2012, from the International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education Web site: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/ user-upload/archive/publications/EducationalPracticesSeriesPdf/prac01e.pdf
9. Brophy, J. E. (2006). Observational research on generic aspects of classroom teaching. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 755-780). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' knowledge of what students know: The case of reading. Reading Improvement, 29, 34-39.
12. Cronbach, L. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity". Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193. doi: 10.1037/h0044919
13. Ditton, H. (2000). Qualitätskontrolle und-sicherung in Schule und Unterricht. Ein Überblick über den Stand der empirischen Forschung [Quality controls and management in schools and classes]. In A. Helmke, W. Hornstein & E. Terhart (Eds.), Qualität und Qualitätssicherung im Bildungsbereich: Schule, Sozialpädagogik, Hochschule. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41. Beiheft (S. 73-92). Weinheim: Beltz.
14. Eckert, T. L. & Arbolino, L. A. (2005). The role of teacher perspectives in diagnostic and program evaluation decision-making. In R. Brown-Chidsey (Ed.), Beyond labels: Noncategorical individualized assessment methods (S. 65-81). New York, NY: Guilford.
15. Geiser, C. (2012). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: Guilford.
16. Gold, A., Mokhlesgerami, J., Rühl, K., Schreblowski, S. & Souvignier, E. (2006). Wir werden Textdetektive: Lehrermanual [Becoming a text-detective] (2nd ed.). Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
17. Gold, A., Trenk-Hinterberger, I. & Souvignier, E. (2009). Die Textdetektive. Ein strategieorientiertes Programm zur Förderung des Leseverständnisses [The text-detectives. A strategy-based program to foster reading comprehension]. In W. Lenhard & W. Schneider (Eds.), Diagnose und Förderung des Leseverständnisses (Test und Trends N.F. Vol. 7) (pp. 207-226). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
18. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
19. Helmke, A. (2003). Unterrichtsqualität: Erfassen, Bewerten, Verbessern [Instructional quality: Assessment, judgment, improvement]. Seelze: Kallmeyer.
20. Helmke, A. & Weinert, F. E. (1997). Unterrichtsqualität und Leistungsentwicklung: Ergebnisse aus dem SCHOLASTIK Projekt [Instructional quality and achievement gains]. In F. E. Weinert & A. Helmke (Eds.), Entwicklung im Grundschulalter (S. 241-251). Weinheim: Psychologie.
21. Helmke, A. & Schrader, F.-W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgment accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 91-98.
22. Hoge, R. D. (1983). Psychometric properties of teacher judgment measures of pupil aptitudes, classroom behaviors, and achievement levels. Journal of Special Education, 17, 401-429. doi: 10.1177/002246698301700404
23. Hoge, R. D. & Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297-313. doi: 10.3102/00346543059003297
24. Hurwitz, J. T., Elliott, S. N. & Braden, J. P. (2007). The influence of test familiarity and student disability status upon teachers' judgments of students' test performance. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 115-144. doi: 10.1037/1045-3830.22.2.115
25. Jones, V. (1996). Classroom management. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 503-521). New York, NY: Macmillan.
26. Karing, C., Pfost, M. & Artelt, C. (2011). Hängt die diagnostische Kompetenz von Sekundarstufenlehrkräften mit der Entwicklung der Lesekompetenz und der mathematischen Kompetenz ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler zusammen? [Is there a relationship between lower secondary school teacher judgment accuracy and the development of students' reading and mathematical competence?]. Journal for Educational Research Online, 3, 119-147.
27. Lorenz, C. (2011). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Grundschullehrkräften [Diagnostic competencies of primary school teachers]. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
28. Moely, B. E., Hart, S. S., Leal, L., Santulli, K. A., Rao, N., Johnson, T. et al. (1992). The Teacher's Role in Facilitating Memory and Study Strategy Development in the Elementary School Classroom. Child Development, 63, 653-672. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01653.x
29. Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y. & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
30. Pearson, P. D., Roehler, L. R., Dole, J. A. & Duffy, G. G. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 145-199). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Rubin, D. B. (1996). Multiple Imputation after 18 + years. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 434, 473-489. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1996. 10476908
32. Schrader, F.-W. & Helmke, A. (1987). Diagnostische Kompetenz von Lehrern: Komponenten und Wirkungen [Teachers' diagnostic competencies: components and effects]. Empirische Pädagogik, 1, 27-52.
33. Snijders, T. & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced modeling. London: Sage.
34. Souvignier, E. & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2005). Implementation eines Programms zur Vermittlung von Lesestrategien im Deutschunterricht [Moving strategy-oriented reading instruction into the classroom: The role of the teacher]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 249-261. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.19.4.249 (Pubitemid 41815679)
35. Souvignier, E. & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57-71. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2005.12.006 (Pubitemid 43349571)
36. Souvignier, E., Trenk-Hinterberger I., Adam-Schwebe, S. & Gold, A. (2008). Frankfurter Leseverständnistest für 5. und 6. Klassen (FLVT 5-6) [Frankfurt reading-comprehension test for classes 5 to 6]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
37. Spinath, B. (2005). Akkuratheit der Einschätzung von Schülermerkmalen durch Lehrer und das Konstrukt der diagnostischen Kompetenz [Accuracy of teacher judgments on student characteristics and the construct of diagnostic competence]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 85-95. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.19.12.85 (Pubitemid 40551608)
38. Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J. & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0027627
39. Trenk-Hinterberger, I. & Souvignier, E. (2006). Wir sind Textdetektive: Lehrermanual [We are text-detectives]. Goettingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
40. Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D. & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Review of Educational Research, 63, 249-294. doi: 10.3102/00346543063003249
41. Weinert, F. E., Schrader, F.-W. & Helmke, A. (1990). Educational expertise: Closing the gap between educational research and classroom practice. School Psychology International, 11, 163-180. doi: 10.1177/0143034390113002