Nonselective access of English phonology in bi-scriptal Chinese-Korean visual word recognition

Cognitive Processing

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 435-441

  Jin, Zheng ^a,b  

^a ZHENGZHOU NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Nonselective Hypothesis; Phonological recoding; Trilingual; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BILINGUALISM; CHINESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LIFESTYLE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORD RECOGNITION;

CHINA; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPUBLIC OF KOREA; SEMANTICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885953320     PISSN: 16124782     EISSN: 16124790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10339-013-0562-4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barsalou LW (1992) Cognitive psychology: an overview for cognitive scientists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ
2. Brysbaert M (1998) Word recognition in bilinguals: Evidence against the existence of two separate lexicons. Psychologica Belgica 38:163-175
3. Brysbaert M, Van Dyck G, Van de Poel M (1999) Visual word recognition in bilinguals: evidence from masked phonological priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 25(1):137-148
4. Chen HC, Ng ML (1989) Semantic facilitation and translation priming effects in Chinese-English bilinguals. Mem Cogn 17(4):454-462
5. Coltheart M et al (1993) Models of reading aloud: dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychol Rev 100(4):589-608
6. Coslett HB (1991) Read but not write "idea": evidence for a third reading mechanism. Brain Lang 40(4):425-443
7. De Groot AMB, Delmaar P, Lupker SJ (2000) The processing of interlexical homographs in translation recognition and lexical decision: support for nonselective access to bilingual memory. Q J Exp Psychol 53:397-428
8. Dijkstra T, van Heuven WJB (1998) The BIA model and bilingual word recognition. In: Grainger J, Jacobs AM (eds) Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. Scientific psychology series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, pp 189-225
9. Dijkstra T, Grainger J, van Heuven WJB (1999) Recognition of cognates and interlingual homographs: the neglected role of phonology. J Mem Lang 41(4):496-518. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1999.2654
10. Edmonds L, Kiran S (2004) Confrontation naming and semantic relatedness judgments in Spanish/English bilinguals. Aphasiology 18:567-579
11. Gerard LD, Scarborough DL (1989) Language-specific lexical access of homographs by bilinguals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15(2):305-315
12. Heredia R, McLaughlin B (1992) Bilingual memory revisited. In: Harris RJ (ed) Cognitive processing in bilinguals. Advances in psychology, vol 83. North-Holland, Oxford, pp 91-103
13. Kohnert KJ, Hernandez AE, Bates E (1998). Bilingual performance on the Boston naming test: Preliminary norms in Spanish and English. Brain and Language 65:422-440
14. Lee WY (2008) Korean-Chinese and Chinese-Korean dictionary (Xian Dai Han Zhong Zhong Han Ci Dian). Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Beijing
15. Lee Y, Lee CH (2009) Non-selective access of phonology by Korean-Chinese bilinguals. Psychologia Int J Psychol Sci 52(3):198-208. doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2009.198
16. Lee C, Kim Y, Kang B (2003) Korean Hangul word recognition at phonological and orthographic level. Korean J Exp Psychol 15:1-17
17. Lee CH, Nam K, Katz L (2005) Nonselective access of spelling-sound knowledge for Korean-English bilinguals. Int J Psychol 40(6):407-415
18. Lemhöfer K, Dijkstra T, Michel MC (2004) Three languages, one ECHO: cognate effects in trilingual word recognition. Lang Cogn Process 19(5):585-611
19. LINCS (2011) The word reading test. Literacy Information and Communication System (LINCS) http://lincs.ed.gov/readingprofiles/FTWRTintro.htm. Accessed 19 June 2011
20. Macnamara J, Kushnir S (1971) Linguistic independence in bilinguals: the input switch. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 10:480-487
21. Perfetti CA, Zhang S (1995) Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 21(1):24-33. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1. 24
22. Scarborough DL, Gerard L, Cortese C (1984) Independence of lexical access in bilingual word recognition. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 23(1):84-99. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5371(84)90519-x
23. Sumiya H, Healy AF (2004) Phonology in the bilingual Stroop effect. Mem Cogn 32(5):752-758. doi: 10.3758/bf03195865
24. Szubko-Sitarek W (2011) Cognate facilitation effects in trilingual word recognition Studies. Second Lang Learn Teach 1(2):189-208
25. Taft M, Chen HC (1992) Judging homophony in Chinese: the influence of tones. In: Chen H-C, Tzeng OJL (eds) Language processing in Chinese. Advances in psychology, vol 90. North-Holland, Oxford England, pp 151-172
26. Talamas A, Kroll JF, Dufour R (1999) From form to meaning: stages in the acquisition of second-language vocabulary. Bilingualism 2(1):45-58
27. Tan LH, Perfetti CA (1997) Visual Chinese character recognition: does phonological information mediate access to meaning? J Mem Lang 37(1):41-57
28. Tan LH, Perfetti CA (1998) Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: a review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Read Writ 10(3-5):165-200. doi: 10.1023/a:1008086231343
29. Van Heuven WJB, Dijkstra T, Grainger J (1998) Orthographic neighborhood effects in bilingual word recognition. J Mem Lang 39(3):458-483. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2584
30. Van Wijnendaele I, Brysbaert M (2002) Visual word recognition in bilinguals: phonological priming from the second to the first language. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28(3):616-627
31. Wang M, Park Y, Lee KR (2006) Korean-English biliteracy acquisition: cross-language phonological and orthographic transfer. J Educ Psychol 98:148-158
32. Wang M, Ko IY, Choi J (2009) The importance of morphological awareness in Korean-English biliteracy acquisition. Contemp Educ Psychol 34(2):132-142