Health policy implications of outcomes measurement in orthopaedics

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 471, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 3475-3481

  Andrawis, John Philip ^a   Chenok, Kate Eresian ^b   Bozic, Kevin J ^c  

^a HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Pacific Business Group on Health   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTING; CLINICAL PATHWAY; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST CONTROL; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LEADERSHIP; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; ORTHOPEDICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTER; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84885950893     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3014-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Acorn Systems Inc. Profitability and cost management software. Available at: http://www.acornsys.com/time-driven-activity-based-costing/time-driven- activity-based-costing-0/. Accessed March 24, 2013.
2. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt L. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833.
3. Bozic KJ, Maselli J, Pekow PS, Lindenauer PK, Vail TP, Auerbach AD. The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2643-2652.
4. Calvillo-King L, Arnold D, Eubank KJ, Lo M, Yunyongying P, Stieglitz H, Halm EA. Impact of social factors on risk of readmission or mortality in pneumonia and heart failure: systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:269-282.
5. Capettini R, Chow CW, McNamee AH. On the need and opportunities for improving costing and cost management in healthcare organizations. Managerial Finance. 1998;24:46-59.
6. Commonwealth Fund. US Spends far more for health care than 12 industrialized nations, but quality varies. 2012. Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/News/News-Releases/2012/May/US-Spends-Far-More- for-Health-Care-Than-12-Industrialized-Nations-but-Quality-Varies.aspx. Accessed November 26, 2012.
7. Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Hawker GA, Roos EM, Maillefert JF, Lohmander LS. Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:843-847.
8. Dawson J, Carr A. Outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:313-315.
9. Demeere N, Stouthuysen K, Roodhooft F. Time-driven activity-based costing in an outpatient clinic environment: development, relevance and managerial impact. Health Policy. 2009;92:296-304.
10. Eldenburg L, Krishnan R. Management accounting and control in health care: an economics perspective. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research. 2006;2:859-883.
11. Fairclough DL, Peterson HF, Cella D, Bonomi P. Comparison of several model-based methods for analysing incomplete quality of life data in cancer clinical trials. Stat Med. 1998;17:781-796.
12. Fisher ES, Bell J-E, Tomek IM, Esty AR, Goodman DC. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice. Trends and regional variation in hip, knee and shoulder replacement. 2010. Available at: http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/downloads/reports/Joint-Replacement-0410.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2012.
13. Gliklich R, Dreyer N. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. Rockville, MD, USA: US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007.
14. Hennrikus WP, Waters PM, Bae DS, Virk SS, Shah AS. Inside the value revolution at Children's Hospital Boston: time-driven activity-based costing in orthopaedic surgery. Harvard Orthopaedic Journal. 2012;14:50-57.
15. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop. 2000;71:111-121.
16. Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R, Cook C. Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint Bone Spine. 2007;74:594-599.
17. Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, Rothwell AG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:584-591.
18. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev. 2004;82:131-138, 150.
19. Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven Activity-based Costing: A Simpler and More Powerful Path to Higher Profits. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business Press; 2007.
20. Kolling C, Simmen BR, Labek G, Goldhahn J. Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1567-1573.
21. Kopec JA. Measuring functional outcomes in persons with back pain: a review of back-specific questionnaires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3110-3114.
22. Labek G, Janda W, Agreiter M, Schuh R, Böhler N. Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2011;35:157-163.
23. Lammin K, Sharma S, Porter M. (iii) What we can learn from the registries. Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:242-245.
24. Lane NE. Osteoarthritis of the hip. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1413-1421.
25. Lievens Y, Van Den Bogaert W, Kesteloot K. Activity-based costing: a practical model for cost calculation in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:522-535.
26. Little RJ. Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90:1112-1121.
27. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(Suppl 2):2-20.
28. Mitka M. GRowth in health care spending slows, but still outpaces rate of inflation. JAMA. 2009;301:815-816.
29. Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Nicholas LH, Dimick JB, Mph M. Evaluating popular media and Internet-based hospital quality ratings for cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011;146:600-604.
30. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. How we're funded. 2012. Available at: http://www.pcori.org/how-were-funded/. Accessed November 26, 2012.
31. Polk A, Rasmussen JV, Brorson S, Olsen BS. Reliability of patient-reported functional outcome in a joint replacement registry: a comparison of primary responders and non-responders in the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:1-6.
32. Porter ME. Measuring health outcomes: the outcomes hierarchy. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477-2481 (Supplementary Appendix 2). Available at: http://www.academia.edu/2917824/Measuring-health-outcomes-the-outcomes- hierarchy. Accessed March 2013.
33. Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477-2481.
34. Rasmussen JV, Jakobsen J, Brorson S, Olsen BS. The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry: clinical outcome and short-term survival of 2,137 primary shoulder replacements. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:171-173.
35. Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg L, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:867-875.
36. Rolfson O, Rothwell A, Sedrakyan A, Chenok KE, Bohm E, Bozic KJ, Garellick G. Use of patient-reported outcomes in the context of different levels of data. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:66-71.
37. Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:17.
38. Rosenthal JA, Lu X, Cram P. Availability of consumer prices from US hospitals for a common surgical procedure. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:427-432.
39. Rothwell AG. Development of the New Zealand Joint Register. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1999;58:148-160.
40. Rubin HR, Pronovost P, Diette GB. The advantages and disadvantages of process-based measures of health care quality. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001;13:469-474.
41. Saleh KJ, Bershadsky B, Cheng E, Kane R. Lessons learned from the hip and knee musculoskeletal outcomes data evaluation and management system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:272.
42. Soderman P, Malchau H. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:39-46.
43. Stengel R. The high cost of care. Time. 2013;181:3.
44. Stulberg JJ, Delaney CP, Neuhauser DV, Aron DC, Fu P, Koroukian SM. Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections. JAMA. 2010;303:2479-2485.
45. Swiontkowski MF, Buckwalter JA, Keller RB, Haralson R. Symposium - the outcomes movement in orthopaedic surgery: where we are and where we should go. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:732-740.
46. Tomek IM, Sabel AL, Froimson MI, Muschler G, Jevsevar DS, Koenig KM, Lewallen DG, Naessens JM, Savitz LA, Westrich JL. A collaborative of leading health systems finds wide variations in total knee replacement delivery and takes steps to improve value. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31:1329-1338.
47. United HealthCare. UnitedHealth premium physician designation program: detailed methodology. 2012. Available at: https://http://www. unitedhealthcareonline.com/ccmcontent/ProviderII/UHC/en-US/Assets/ ProviderStaticFiles/ProviderStaticFilesPdf/PremiumMethodology/ UnitedHealth-Premium-Detailed-Methodology.pdf. Accessed November 26, 2012.
48. US Department of Health & Human Services. What information can I get about hospitals? 2012. Available at: http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/About/ HOSInfo/Hospital-Info.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1. Accessed November 30, 2012.
49. Walker S, Mason AR, Claxton K, Cookson R, Fenwick E, Fleetcroft R, Sculpher M. Value for money and the quality and outcomes framework in primary care in the UK NHS. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:e213-220.
50. Yen-Ju Lin B, Chao T-H, Yao Y, Tu S-M, Wu C-C, Chern J-Y, Chao S-H, Shaw K-Y. How can activity-based costing methodology be performed as a powerful tool to calculate costs and secure appropriate patient care? Journal of Medical Systems. 2007;31:85-90.