Reliability of patient-reported functional outcome in a joint replacement registry

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 84, Issue , 2013, Pages 12-17

  Polk, Anne ^a   Rasmussen, Jeppe V ^a   Brorson, Stig ^a   Olsen, Bo S ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; RELIABILITY; REOPERATION; SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; TELECONSULTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WESTERN ONTARIO OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE SHOULDER INDEX;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; REMINDER SYSTEMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF REPORT; SHOULDER JOINT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873907056     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2013.765622     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cazeneuve J F, Cristofari D J. Long term functional outcome following reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the elderly. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97 (6): 583-9.
2. Gluud L L. Bias in clinical intervention research. Am J Epidemiol 2006; 163 (6): 493-501.
3. Goodfellow J W, O'Connor J J, Murray D W. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2010; 92 (12): 1628-31.
4. Grimes D A, Schulz K F. Bias and causal associations in observational research. Lancet 2002; 359 (9302): 248-52.
5. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of healthrelated quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46 (12): 1417-32.
6. Karrholm J. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (www.shpr.se). Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1): 3-4.
7. Kim J, Lonner J H, Nelson C L, Lotke P A. Response bias: effect on outcomes evaluation by mail surveys after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86 (1): 15-21.
8. Knutson K, Robertsson O. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (www. knee.se). Acta Orthop 2010; 81 (1): 5-7.
9. Kwon S K, Kang Y G, Chang C B, Sung S C, Kim T K. Interpretations of the clinical outcomes of the nonresponders to mail surveys in patients after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (1): 133-7.
10. Lo I K, Griffin S, Kirkley A. The development of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for osteoarthritis of the shoulder: The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) index. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9 (8): 771-8.
11. Ludemann R, Watson D I, Jamieson G G. Influence of follow-up methodology and completeness on apparent clinical outcome of fundoplication. Am J Surg 2003; 186 (2): 143-7.
12. Malchau H, Garellick G, Eisler T, Karrholm J, Herberts P. Presidential guest address: the Swedish Hip Registry: increasing the sensitivity by patient outcome data. Clin Orthop 2005; (441): 19-29.
13. Norquist B M, Goldberg B A, Matsen F A, III. Challenges in evaluating patients lost to follow-up in clinical studies of rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2000; 82 (6): 838-42.
14. Ohl X, Nerot C, Saddiki R, Dehoux E. Shoulder hemi arthroplasty radiological and clinical outcomes at more than two years follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2010; 96 (3): 208-15.
15. Rasmussen J V, Jakobsen J, Brorson S, Olsen B S. The Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry: clinical outcome and short-term survival of 2, 137 primary shoulder replacements. Acta Orthop 2012; 83 (2): 171-3.
16. Ritter M A, Thong A E, Davis K E, Berend M E, Meding J B, Faris P M. Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86 (3): 438-42.
17. Rolfson O, Karrholm J, Dahlberg L E, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011; 93 (7): 867-75.
18. Solberg T K, Sorlie A, Sjaavik K, Nygaard O P, Ingebrigtsen T. Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (1): 56-63.
19. Wirth M A, Tapscott R S, Southworth C, Rockwood C A, Jr. Treatment of glenohumeral arthritis with a hemiarthroplasty: a minimum five-year followup outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2006; 88 (5): 964-73.