Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 157-163

  Labek, Gerold ^a   Janda, Wolfgang ^a   Agreiter, Mark ^a   Schuh, Reinhard ^a   Böhler, Nikolaus ^b  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b KEPLER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REGISTER; REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; PATIENT DROPOUTS; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79955943366     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-010-1131-4     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. Robertsson O, Lewold S, Knutson K, Lidgren L (2000) The Swedish knee arthroplasty project. Acta Orthop Scand 71(1):7-18 (Pubitemid 30150549)
2. Furnes A, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Engesæter LB, Vollset SE (1996) The economic impact of failures in total hip replacement surgery. The Norwegian arthroplasty register 1987-1993. Acta Orthop Scand 67:115-121
3. Herberts P, Malchau H (1997) How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 344:44-60 (Pubitemid 27490635)
4. Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (1999) The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. 25 years experience. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 58-3:133-138
5. Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71-2:111-121 (Pubitemid 30611734)
6. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie SA, Vollset SE (2000) The Norwegian arthroplasty register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 71-4:337-353
7. Lucht U (2000) The Danish hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 71-5:433-439
8. Puolakka TJ, Pajamaki KJ, Halonen PJ, Pulkinen PO, Paavolainen P, Nevelainen JK (2001) The Finnish arthroplasty register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 72(5):433-441 (Pubitemid 33043581)
9. Malchau H, Garrellick G, Eisler T, Karrholm J, Herberts P (2005) Presidential guest address: the Swedish hip registry: increasing the sensitivity by patient outcome data. Clin Orthop 441:19-29 (Pubitemid 44384200)
10. Robertsson O (2007) Knee arthroplasty registers. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89-B:1-4
11. Robertsson O (2010) The Swedish knee arthroplasty register - The inside story. Acta Orthop 81(1):5-7
12. Labek G (2009) Handbook for the development and operation of an outcome register for medical devices. www.ear.efort.org. Accessed 29 July 2010
13. No authors listed (2009) Position statement in support of National Joint Registries. J Bone Joint Surg A 91:2983
14. Horan FT (2010) Joint registries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(6):749-750
15. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2003) Annual Report 2002. Available at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/. Accessed 30 July 2010
16. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2008) Annual Report 2007. Available at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/. Accessed 30 July 2010
17. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2009) Annual Report 2008. Available at: http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/. Accessed 30 July 2010
18. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (1999) Validation of the Swedish knee arthroplasty register: a postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand 70-5:467-472
19. Sodermann P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Johnell O (2000) Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 15(7):884-889
20. Pedersen AB, Johnsen SP, Overgaard S, Soballe K, Sorensen HT, Lucht U (2004) Registration in the Danish hip arthroplasty registry: completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications. Acta Orthop Scand 75-4:434-441 (Pubitemid 39179530)
21. Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Soreide JA (2005) Validation of data in the Norwegian arthroplasty register and the Norwegian patient register: 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop 76(6):823-828
22. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE, Kindseth O (2006) Registration completeness in the Norwegian arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop 77(1):49-56 (Pubitemid 43879154)
23. Stea S, Bordini B, De Clerico M, Petropulacos K, Toni A (2009) First hip arthroplasty register in Italy: 55,000 cases and 7 year follow up. Int Orthop 33(2):339-346
24. No authors listed. EFORT EAR Minimal datasets. www.ear.efort.org. Accessed 30 July 2010
25. Robertsson O, Ranstam JP (2003) No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: Analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish knee arthroplasty register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4:1
26. Labek G, Stoica CI, Böhler N (2008) Comparison of information in arthroplasty registers from different countries. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B:288-291 (Pubitemid 351428941)
27. Ranstam J, Robertsson O (2010) Statistical analyses of arthroplasty register data. Acta Orthop 81(1):10-14
28. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register (2010) Annual Report 2009. Available at: http://www.knee.se. Accessed 30 July 2010
29. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (2010) Annual Report 2009. Available at: http://www.dhr.dk/ENGLISH.htm. Accessed 30 July 2010
30. Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register (Danish) (2010) Annual Report 2009. http://www.knee.dk/groups/dkr/login-dkr.php. Accessed 30 July 2010
31. Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Mehnert F, Johnsen SP, Søballe K (2010) The risk of revision after primary total hip arthroplasty among statin users: a nationwide population-based nested case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(5):1063-1072
32. Labek G, the QoLA Project Group (2010) Quality of publications regarding the outcome of revision rate after arthroplasty. http:/www.ear.efort.org. Accessed 30 July 2010
33. Havelin LI (1995) Hip arthroplasty in Norway 1987-1994. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Bergen, Norway. Thesis, University of Bergen
34. No authors listed (2010) Levels of evidence for primary research questions. http://www2.ejbjs.org/misc/instrux.dtl#levels. Accessed 30 July 2010