Lessons learned from the hip and knee musculoskeletal outcomes data evaluation and management system

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 429, Issue , 2004, Pages 272-278

  Saleh, Khaled J ^a,b,c   Bershadsky, Boris ^a   Cheng, Edward ^a   Kane, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE SURGERY; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDICAL SOCIETY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; WELLBEING;

EID: 9644266579     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137589.23853.61     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Academy and American Association Orthopaedic Surgeons Bulletin: National Center for Health Statistics for Data on Hip and Knee Surgery. 47:14, 1999.
2. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS: Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. JAMA 271:257-265, 1998.
3. Cho MK, Bero LA: Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. JAMA 272:101-104, 1994.
4. Coyte PC, Young W, Williams JI: Devolution of hip and knee replacement surgery? Can J Surg 39:373-378, 1996.
5. Daltroy LH, Cats-Baril WL, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Liang MH: The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: Reliability and validity tests. Spine 21:741-749, 1996.
6. Daltroy LH, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Goldberg MJ: The POSNA pediatric musculoskeletal functional health questionnaire: Report on reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Pediatric Outcomes Instrument Development Group. Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America. J Pediatr Orthop 18:561-571, 1998.
7. Ebskov LB: Epidemiology of lower limb amputations in diabetics in Denmark (1980 to 1989). Int Orthop 15:285-288, 1991.
8. Gartland JJ: Orthopaedic clinical research: Deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J Bone Joint Surg 70A:1357-1364, 1988.
9. Gross M: A critique of the methodologies used in clinical studies of hip-joint arthroplasty published in the English-language orthopaedic literature. J Bone Joint Surg 70A:1364-1371, 1988.
10. Harbour R, Miller J: A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 323:334-336, 2001.
11. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB, Langeland N: The Norwegian arthroplasty register: A survey of 17,444 hip replacements 1987-1990. Acta Orthop Scand 64:245-251, 1993.
12. Herberts P, Malchau H: How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 344:44-60, 1997.
13. Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: Normative values from the general population. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:208-215, 2002.
14. Kane R (ed): Understanding Health Care Outcomes Research. Gaithersburg, MD, Aspen Publishers 1997.
15. Kreibich DN, Vaz M, Bourne RB: What is the best way of assessing outcome after total knee replacement? Clin Orthop 331:221-225, 1996.
16. Laupacis A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, et al: The effect of elective total hip replacement on health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg 75A:1619-1626, 1993.
17. Lewold S, Knutson K, Lidgren L: Reduced failure rate in knee prosthetic surgery with improved implantation technique. Clin Orthop 287:94-97, 1993.
18. Naylor C, Anderson G, Joel V (eds): Patterns of Healthcare in Ontario. Ottawa, National Printers Inc 1-327, 1994.
19. Paavolainen P, Pukkala E, Pulkkinen P, Visuri T: Cancer incidence in Finnish hip replacement patients from 1980 to 1995: A nationwide cohort study involving 31,651 patients. J Arthroplasty 14:272-280, 1999.
20. Reisch JS, Tyson JE, Mize SG: Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies. Pediatrics 84:815-827, 1989.
21. Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Laupacis A, et al: A double-blind study of 250 cases comparing cemented with cementless total hip arthroplasty: Cost-effectiveness and its impact on health-related quality of life. Clin Orthop 298:156-164, 1994.
22. Rudicel S, Esdaile J: The randomized clinical trial in orthopaedics: Obligation or option? J Bone Joint Surg 67A:1284-1293, 1985.
23. Saleh KJ, Radosevich DM, Kassim XX: Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys. J Orthop Res 20:1146-1151, 2002.
24. Saleh KJ, Wood KC, Gafni A, Gross AE: Immediate surgery versus waiting list policy in revision total hip arthroplasty: An economic evaluation. J Arthroplasty 12:1-10, 1997.
25. Smith JS, Watts HG: Methods for locating missing patients for the purpose of long-term clinical studies. J Bone Joint Surg 80A:431-438, 1998.
26. Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P: Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 71:354-359, 2000.
27. Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P: Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 72:113-119, 2001.