Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form

Joint Bone Spine

Volumn 74, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 594-599

  Higgins, Laurence D ^a   Taylor, Marcus K ^b   Park, Daniel ^c   Ghodadra, Neil ^c   Marchant, Milford ^c   Pietrobon, Ricardo ^c   Cook, Chad ^c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Department of Surgery   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

IKDC Subjective Knee Form; IRT; SF 12; Validation

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITY LEVEL; ADULT; ARTICLE; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERNATIONAL KNEE DOCUMENTATION COMMITTEE; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PROMAX ROTATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SPORTS MEDICINE; SYMPTOM; SYMPTOM AND KNEE ARTICULATION; VALIDITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; KNEE; KNEE INJURIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 37049033658     PISSN: 1297319X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.01.036     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Marx R.G. Knee rating scales. Arthroscopy 19 (2003) 1103-1108
2. Barber-Westin S.D., Noyes F.R., and McCloskey J.W. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med 27 (1999) 402-416
3. Irrgang J.J., Snyder-Mackler L., Wainner R.S., Fu F.H., and Harner C.D. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 (1998) 1132-1145
4. Johnson D.S., and Smith R.B. Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee - what's the score?. Knee 8 (2001) 51-57
5. Marx R.G., Jones E.C., Allen A.A., Altchek D.W., O'Brien S.J., Rodeo S.A., et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83 (2001) 1459-1469
6. Paxton E.W., Fithian D.C., Stone M.L., and Silva P. The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocation outcomes. Am J Sports Med 31 (2003) 487-492
7. Roos E.M., Roos H.P., Lohmander L.S., Ekdahl C., and Beynnon B.D. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) - development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28 (1998) 88-96
8. Ryd L., Karrholm J., and Ahlvin P. Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Evaluation of interobserver variability and the envelope of bias. Acta Orthop Scand 68 (1997) 41-45 Score Assessment Group
9. Anderson A.F., Irrgang J.J., Kocher M.S., Mann B.J., Harrast J.J., and International Knee Documentation Committee. The international knee documentation committee subjective knee evaluation form: normative data. Am J Sports Med 34 (2006) 128-135
10. Irrgang J.J., Anderson A.F., Boland A.L., Harner C.D., Kurosaka M., Neyret P., et al. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29 (2001) 600-613
11. Anderson A.F. Transepiphyseal replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament in skeletally immature patients. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 1255-1263
12. Anderson A.F. Transepiphyseal replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament using quadruple hamstring grafts in skeletally immature patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 (2004) 201-209
13. Delcogliano A., Caporaso A., Menghi A., Rinonapoli G., and Chiossi S. Results of autologous osteochondral grafts in chondral lesions of the knee. Minerva Chir 57 (2002) 273-281
14. Haverkamp D., Sierevelt I.N., Breugem S.J.M., Lohuis K., Blankevoort L., van Dijk C.N., et al. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 34 (2006) 1680-1684
15. Ma C.B., Francis K., Towers J., Irrgang J., Fu F.H., Harner C.H., et al. Hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton-post fixation. Arthroscopy 20 (2004) 122-128
16. Padua R., Bondi R., Ceccarelli E., Bondi L., Romanini E., Zanoli G., et al. Italian version of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arthroscopy 20 (2004) 819-823
17. Vitkus L., Fiodorovas M., and Pocius G. Knee joint evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament plasty. Medicina (Kaunas) 38 (2002) 510-514
18. Ware Jr. J.E., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 (1992) 473-483
19. Embretson S., and Reise S.P. Item response theory for psychologists (2000), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
20. Masters G.N. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47 (1982) 149-173
21. Ware Jr. J.E., Kosinski M., and Keller S.D. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34 (1996) 220-233
22. McHorney C.A., Ware Jr. J.E., Lu J.F., and Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 32 (1994) 40-66
23. McHorney C.A., Ware Jr. J.E., and Raczek A.E. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31 (1993) 247-263
24. Thissen D. MULTILOG user's guide: multiple categorical analysis and test scoring using item response theory (1991), Scientific Software International, Chicago
25. van der Linden W., and Hambleton R. Handbook of modern item response theory (1997), Springer, New York
26. Bot S.D., Terwee C.B., van der Windt D.A., Bouter L.M., Dekker J., and de Vet H.C. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis 63 (2004) 335-341