Neighborhood-conditioned patterns in phonetic detail: Relating coarticulation and hyperarticulation

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 491-508

  Scarborough, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885903369     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ali L., Gallagher T., Goldstein J., Daniloff R. Perception of coarticulated nasality. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1971, 70:329-339.
2. Auer E.T., Luce P.A. Probabilistic phonotactics in spoken word recognition. The handbook of speech perception 2005, 610-630. Blackwell, Oxford. D.B. Pisoni, R.E. Remez (Eds.).
3. Aylett M., Turk A. Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2006, 119:3048-3058.
4. Baayen R.H., Piepenbrock R., Gulikers L. The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM] 1995, Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania [distributor], Philadelphia, PA.
5. Baese-Berk M., Goldrick M. Mechanisms of interaction in speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes 2009, 24:527-554.
6. Baker R.E., Bradlow A.R. Variability in word duration as a function of probability, speech style, and prosody. Language and Speech 2009, 52:391-413.
7. Bard E.G., Anderson A.H., Sotillo C., Aylett M., Doherty-Sneddon G., Newlands A. Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language 2000, 42:1-22.
8. Bard E.G., Aylett M. Referential form, word duration, and modeling the listener in spoken dialogue. Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions 2004, 173-191. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J.C. Trueswell, M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.).
9. Beckman M.E., Edwards J. Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories. Papers in laboratory phonology III 1994, 7-33. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P.A. Keating (Ed.).
10. Beddor P.S. A coarticulatory path to sound change. Language 2009, 85:785-821.
11. Beddor P.S., Boland J.E., Coetzee A., McGowan K. The perceptual time course of coarticulatory nasalization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009, 126:2302. [abstract].
12. Beddor P.S., Krakow R.A. Perception of coarticulatory nasalization by speakers of English and Thai: Evidence for partial compensation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1999, 106:2868-2887.
13. Beddor P.S., Harnsberger J.D., Lindemann S. Language-specific patterns of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: acoustic structures and their perceptual correlates. Journal of Phonetics 2002, 30(4):591-627.
14. Bell A., Brenier J., Gregory M., Girand C., Jurafsky D. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 2009, 60:92-111.
15. Bell-Berti F., Harris K.S. A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica 1981, 38:9-20.
16. Bolinger D. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 1958, 14:109-149.
17. Bradlow A.R. UConfluent talker- and listener-related forces in clear speech productionUH. Papers in Ulaboratory phonology VII 2002, 241-273. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York. C. Gussenhoven, N. Warner (Eds.).
18. Bradlow A.R., Kraus N., Hayes E. Speaking clearly for learning-impaired children: Sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2003, 46:80-97.
19. Bradlow A.R., Torretta G.M., Pisoni D.B. Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication 1996, 20:255-272.
20. Browman C., Goldstein L. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 1992, 49:155-180.
21. Brown R.A. Effects of lexical confusability on the production of coarticulation 2001, UCLA, (M.A. thesis).
22. Chen, M.Y. (1996) Acoustic correlates of nasality in speech (Ph.D. dissertation), Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA.
23. Chen M.Y. Acoustic correlates of English and French nasalized vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997, 102:2360-2370.
24. Cho T. Prosodically-conditioned strengthening and vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in English. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32:141-176.
25. Cole R.A., Jakimik J. How are syllables used to recognize words?. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1980, 67:965-970.
26. Cole R.A., Jakimik J., Cooper W.E. Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1978, 64:44-56.
27. de Jong K. Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 2004, 32:493-516.
28. de Jong K., Beckman M.E., Edwards J. The interplay between prosodic structure and coarticulation. Language and Speech 1993, 36:197-212.
29. de Jong K.J. The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1995, 97:491-504.
30. de Jong K.J. Attention modulation and the formal properties of stress systems. Chicago linguistic society 2000, Vol. 1:71-91. Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.
31. Dell G.S. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes 1990, 5:313-349.
32. Duez D. Second formant locus-nucleus patterns: An investigation of spontaneous French speech. Speech Communication 1992, 11:417-427.
33. Fidelholz, J. (1975). Word frequency and vowel reduction in English. In Chicago Linguistics Society (Vol. 75, pp. 200-213).
34. Fowler C.A. Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics 1980, 8:113-133.
35. Fowler C.A. Production and perception of coarticulation among stressed and unstressed vowels. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1981, 46:127-139.
36. Fowler C.A. Converging sources of evidence on spoken and perceived rhythms of speech: Cyclic production of vowels in sequences of monosyllabic stress feet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1983, 112:386-412.
37. Fowler C.A. Segmentation of coarticulated speech in perception. Perception & Psychophysics 1984, 36:359-368.
38. Fowler C.A. Current perspective on language and speech production: A critical overview. Speech science 1985, 193-278. Taylor and Francis, London. R. Daniloff (Ed.).
39. Fowler C.A. Acoustic and kinematic correlates of contrastive stress accent in spoken English. Producing speech: Contemporary issues: For Katherine Safford Harris 1995, 355-373. AIP Publishing, Melville, Long Island, New York. F. Bell-Berti, J.J. Raphael (Eds.).
40. Fowler C.A. Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: effects of coarticulation resistance. Journal of Phonetics 2005, 33(2):199-213.
41. Fowler C.A., Brown J.M. Perceptual parsing of acoustic consequences of velum lowering from information for vowels. Perception and Psychophysics 2000, 62:21-32.
42. Fowler C.A., Smith M.R. Speech perception as vector analysis: An approach to the problem of invariance and segmentation. Invariance and variability in speech processes 1986, 123-139. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. J.S. Perkell, D.H. Klatt (Eds.).
43. Gay T. Physiological and acoustic correlates of perceived stress. Language and Speech 1978, 21:347-353.
44. Glanzer M., Ehrenreich S.L. Structure and search of the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1979, 18:381-398.
45. Greenberg J.H., Jenkins J.J. Studies in the psychological correlates of the sound system of American English. Word 1964, 20:157-177.
46. Grosjean F. Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics 1980, 28:267-283.
47. Grossberg S., Myers C.W. The resonant dynamics of speech perception: Interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. Psychological Review 2000, 4:735-767.
48. Hanley T.D., Steer M.D. Effect of level of distracting noise upon speaking rate, duration and intensity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1949, 14:363-368.
49. Howes D.H. On the relation between the intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1957, 29:296-305.
50. Jescheniak J.D., Levelt W.J.M. Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:824-843.
51. Jurafsky D., Bell A., Girand C. The role of the lemma in form variation. Papers in laboratory phonology VII 2002, 3-34. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York. N. Warner, C. Gussenhoven (Eds.).
52. Jurafsky D., Bell A., Gregory M., Raymond W.D. Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure 2000, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. J. Bybee, P. Hopper (Eds.).
53. Krull D. Consonant-vowel coarticulation in spontaneous speech and in reference words. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress Status Reports, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden 1989, 1:101-105.
54. Lahiri A., Marslen-Wilson W. The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition Lexicon. Cognition 1991, 38:245-294.
55. Lane H., Tranel B. The Lombard sign and the role of hearing in speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1971, 14:677-709.
56. Lieberman P. Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech 1963, 6:172-187.
57. Lindblom B. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. Speech production and speech modeling 1990, 403-439. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. W.J. Hardcastle, A. Marchal (Eds.).
58. Lindblom B., Sussman H.M., Agwuele A. A duration-dependent account of coarticulation for hyper- and hypoarticulation. Phonetica 2009, 66:188-195.
59. Lombard E. Le signe de l'élévation de la voix. Annales des maladies de l'oreille, du larynx, du nez et du pharynx 1911, 37:101-119.
60. Luce, P.A. (1986). Neighborhoods of words in the mental lexicon. Research on speech perception progress report, no. 6. Bloomington: Indiana University, Psychology Department, Speech Research Laboratory.
61. Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 1998, 19:1-36.
62. Manuel S. The role of contrast in limiting vowel-to-vowel coarticulation in different languages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990, 88:1286-1298.
63. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Welsh A. Processing interactions and lexical access during words recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 1978, 10:29-63.
64. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Zwitserlood P. Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1989, 15:576-585.
65. Matthies M., Perrier P., Perkell J.S., Zandipour M. Variation in anticipatory coarticulation with changes in clarity and rate. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2001, 44:340-353.
66. Mattingly I.G. Phonetic representation and speech synthesis by rule. The cognitive representation of speech 1981, 415-420. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam. T. Meyers, J. Laver, J. Anderson (Eds.).
67. Moon S.-J., Lindblom B. Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1994, 95:40-55.
68. Munhall K.G., Fowler C.A., Hawkins S., Saltzman E. 'Compensatory shortening' in monosyllables of spoken English. Journal of Phonetics 1992, 20:225-240.
69. Munson B. Lexical access, lexical representation, and vowel production. Papers in laboratory phonology IX 2007, 201-228. Mouton de Gruyter, New York. J.S. Cole, J.I. Hualde (Eds.).
70. Munson B., Solomon N.P. The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 2004, 47:1048-1058.
71. Norris D., McQueen J.M., Cutler A. Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 3:299-325.
72. Nusbaum, H.C., Pisoni, D.B., & Davis, C.K. (1984). Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. Research on speech perception progress report, no. 10. Bloomington: Indiana University, Psychology Department, Speech Research Laboratory.
73. Oldfield R.C., Wingfield A. Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 17:273-281.
74. Picheny M.A., Durlach N.I., Braida L.D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 1986, 29:434-446.
75. Pisoni D.B., Nusbaum H.C., Luce P.A., Slowiaczek L.M. Speech perception, word recognition, and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication 1985, 4:75-95.
76. Repp B.H. Perceptual integration and differentiation of spectral cues for intervocalic stop consonants. Perception and Psychophysics 1978, 24:471-485.
77. Repp B.H. Coarticulation in sequences of two nonhomorganic stop consonants: Perceptual and acoustic evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1983, 74:420-427.
78. Scarborough R. Lexical and contextual predictability: Confluent effects on the production of vowels. Laboratory Phonology 10 2010, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/NY. C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. D'Imperio, N. Vallée (Eds.).
79. Scarborough R. Lexical similarity and speech production: Neighborhoods for nonwords. Lingua 2012, 112:164-176.
80. Segui J., Mehler J., Frauenfelder U., Morton J. The word frequency effect and lexical access. Neuropsychologia 1982, 20:615-627.
81. Smiljanic R., Bradlow A.R. Temporal organization of English clear and plain speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2008, 124:3171-3182.
82. Stemberger J.P., McWhinney B. Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition 1986, 14:17-26.
83. Traunmüller H. Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1990, 88:97-100.
84. Vitevitch M., Luce P. When words compete: Levels of processing in perception of spoken words. Psychological Science 1998, 9:325-329.
85. Vitevitch M.S. The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech 1997, 40:211-228.
86. Vitevitch M.S. The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:735-747.
87. Vitevitch M.S., Sommers M.S. The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition 2003, 31(4):491-504.
88. Warren P., Marslen-Wilson W. Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken words recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 1987, 41:262-275.
89. Whalen D. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 1984, 35:49-64.
90. Wright R. Lexical competition and reduction in speech: A preliminary report. Research on spoken language processing progress report, No. 21 1997, Indiana University, Psychology Department, Speech Research Laboratory, Bloomington.
91. Wright R. Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. Papers in laboratory phonology VI 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.J. Local, R. Ogden, R. Temple (Eds.).
92. Wright R. A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness. Phonetically-based phonology 2004, 34-57. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. B. Hayes, R. Kirchner, D. Steriade (Eds.).
93. Yao Y. The effects of phonological neighborhoods on pronunciation variation in conversational speech 2011, University of California, Berkeley, (Dissertation).