There are plenty of places like home: Using relational representations in hierarchies for distance-based image understanding

Neurocomputing

Volumn 123, Issue , 2014, Pages 75-85

  Antanas, Laura ^a   van Otterlo, Martijn ^b   Oramas Mogrovejo, José ^c   Tuytelaars, Tinne ^c   De Raedt, Luc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Hierarchical image understanding; Relational instance based learning; Relational representations

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; INSTANCE BASED LEARNING; RELATIONAL REPRESENTATIONS; ROBUST FEATURE EXTRACTIONS; SCENE UNDERSTANDING; SEMANTIC STRUCTURES; SPATIAL RELATIONS; SPATIAL STRUCTURE;

EDGE DETECTION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE UNDERSTANDING; SEMANTICS;

IMAGE RETRIEVAL;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA EXTRACTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RELATIONAL REPRESENTATION; SEMANTICS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84885866109     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: 18728286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.10.037     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. L.-J. Li, R. Socher, L. Fei-Fei, Towards total scene understanding: classification, annotation and segmentation in an automatic framework, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2009, pp. 2036-2043.
2. Sudderth E.B., Torralba A., Freeman W.T., Willsky A.S. Describing visual scenes using transformed objects and parts. IJCV 2008, 77:291-330.
3. Tuytelaars T., Mikolajczyk K. Local invariant feature detectors. a survey. Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vision 2007, 3:177-280.
4. Pinz A.J., Bischof H., Kropatsch W.G., Schweighofer G., Haxhimusa Y., Opelt A., Ion A. Representations for cognitive vision: a review of appearance-based, spatio-temporal, and graph-based approaches. Elect. Lett. Comput. Vision Image Anal. 2009, 7:35-61.
5. A. Guzmán, Decomposition of a visual scene into three-dimensional bodies, in: Fall Joint Computer Conference, AFIPS '68 (Fall, part I), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1968, pp. 291-304.
6. T. Kanade, Model representations and control structures in image understanding, in: IJCAI, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1977, pp. 1074-1082.
7. Haralick R. Pictorial Data Analysis, NATO ASI Series. Computer and System Sciences 1983, Springer-Verlag.
8. A. Hanson, E. Riseman, Visions: a computer system for interpreting scenes, in: CVS78, pp. 303-333.
9. T. Matsuyama, V. Hwang, Sigma: a framework for image understanding integration of bottom-up and top-down analyses, in: IJCAI, pp. 908-915.
10. Bunke H., Sanfeliu A. Syntactic and Structural Pattern Recognition: Theory and Applications 1990, World Scientific Pub Co Inc.
11. De Raedt L. Logical and Relational Learning 2008, Springer.
12. Felzenszwalb P., Girshick R., McAllester D., Ramanan D. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. TPAMI 2010, 32:1627-1645.
13. Fergus R., Perona P., Zisserman A. Weakly supervised scale-invariant learning of models for visual recognition. IJCV 2007, 71:273-303.
14. Zhu L., Chen Y., Lin Y., Lin C., Yuille A. Recursive segmentation and recognition templates for image parsing. TPAMI 2012, 34:359-371.
15. Y. Jin, S. Geman, Context and hierarchy in a probabilistic image model, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2006, pp. 2145-2152.
16. R.B. Girshick, P.F. Felzenszwalb, D.A. McAllester, Object detection with grammar models, in: NIPS, 2011, pp. 442-450.
17. De Raedt L., Ramon J. Deriving distance metrics from generality relations. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2009, 30:187-191.
18. J. Hartz, B. Neumann, Learning a knowledge base of ontological concepts for high-level scene interpretation, in: ICMLA, IEEE, 2007, pp. 436-443.
19. J. Hartz, Learning probabilistic structure graphs for classification and detection of object structures, in: ICMLA, IEEE, 2009, pp. 5-11.
20. P. Zhao, T. Fang, J. Xiao, H. Zhang, Q. Zhao, L. Quan, Rectilinear parsing of architecture in urban environment, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2010, pp. 342-349.
21. Müller P., Zeng G., Wonka P., Van Gool L.J. Image-based procedural modeling of facades. ACM Trans. Graph. 2007, 26:85.
22. P. Koutsourakis, L. Simon, O. Teboul, G. Tziritas, N. Paragios, Single view reconstruction using shape grammars for urban environments, in: ICCV, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1795-1802.
23. Esposito F., Malerba D., Semeraro G. Classification in noisy environments using a distance measure between structural symbolic descriptions. PAMI 1992, 14:390-402.
24. M.A. Lippow, L.P. Kaelbling, T. Lozano-Perez, Learning grammatical models for object recognition, 2008.
25. Zhu S.-C., Mumford D. A stochastic grammar of images. Found. Trends. Comput. Graph. Vis. 2006, 2:259-362.
26. K. Terzic, L. Hotz, J. Sochman, Interpreting structures in man-made scenes - combining low-level and high-level structure sources, in: ICAART, pp. 357-364.
27. Szeliski R. Computer Vision. Algorithms and Applications 2010, Springer.
28. Caetano T.S., McAuley J.J., Cheng L., Le Q.V., Smola A.J. Learning graph matching. TPAMI 2009, 31:1048-1058.
29. Z. Harchaoui, F. Bach, Image classification with segmentation graph kernels, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2007, pp. 1-8.
30. M. Petrou, The tower of knowledge: a novel architecture for organizing knowledge combining logic and probability, 2008.
31. Bar-Hillel A., Weinshall D. Efficient learning of relational object class models. IJCV 2008, 77:175-198.
32. Dubba K.S.R., Cohn A.G., Hogg D.C. Event model learning from complex videos using ilp. ECAI, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 2010, vol. 215:93-98. IOS Press.
33. D. Marr, Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information, 1983.
34. S. Muggleton, W.L. Buntine, Machine invention of first order predicates by inverting resolution, in: J.E. Laird (Ed.), ML, Morgan Kaufmann, 1988, pp. 339-352.
35. Ferilli S., Mauro N.D., Basile T.M.A., Esposito F. A complete subsumption algorithm. AI*IA, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2003, vol. 2829:1-13. Springer.
36. Nienhuys-Cheng S.-H. Distance between herbrand interpretations. a measure for approximations to a target concept. ILP, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1997, vol. 1297:213-226. Springer.
37. Horváth T., Wrobel S., Bohnebeck U. Relational instance-based learning with lists and terms. ML 2001, 43:53-80.
38. Kirsten M., Wrobel S., Horváth T. Distance based approaches to relational learning and clustering. Relational Data Mining 2000, 213-230.
39. Busygin S. A new trust region technique for the maximum weight clique problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 2006, 154:2080-2096.
40. Östergård P.R.J. A fast algorithm for the maximum clique problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 2002, 120:197-207.
41. Lozin V., Milanic M. On the maximum independent set problem in subclasses of planar graphs. J. Graph Algorithms Appl. 2010, 14:269-286.
42. Russell B.C., Torralba A., Murphy K.P., Freeman W.T. LabelMe: a database and web-based tool for image annotation. IJCV 2008, 77:157-173.
43. Ferrari V., Fevrier L., Jurie F., Schmid C. Groups of adjacent contour segments for object detection. TPAMI 2008, 36-51.
44. N. Dalal, B. Triggs, Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2005, pp. 886-893.
45. R. Arandjelovic, A. Zisserman, Three things everyone should know to improve object retrieval, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2012, pp. 2911-2918.
46. M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C.K.I. Williams, J. Winn, A. Zisserman, The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2008, 2008.
47. T. Deselaers, V. Ferrari, Global and efficient self-similarity for object classification and detection, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2010, pp. 1633-1640.
48. A. Torralba, K.P. Murphy, W.T. Freeman, Sharing features: efficient boosting procedures for multiclass object detection, in: CVPR, IEEE, 2004, pp. 762-769.
49. L. Antanas, M. van Otterlo, J.O.M., T. Tuytelaars, L.D. Raedt, A relational distance-based framework for hierarchical image understanding, in: P.L. Carmona, J.S. Sánchez, A.L.N. Fred (Eds.), ICPRAM (2), SciTePress, 2012, pp. 206-218.