Global linkage map connects meiotic centromere function to chromosome size in budding yeast

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Volumn 3, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1741-1751

  Baryshnikova, Anastasia ^a,d   VanderSluis, Benjamin ^b   Costanzo, Michael ^a   Myers, Chad L ^b   Cha, Rita S ^c   Andrews, Brenda ^a   Boone, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b University of Minnesota   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Centromere; Chromosome size; Double strand breaks; Genetic linkage; genomics; Meiosis; Rec8; Recombination; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Spo11; Synthetic genetic array (SGA); Yeast

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; REC8 PROTEIN; SPO11 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BUDDING; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOME SIZE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE INTERACTION; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MEIOSIS; MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION; MUTANT; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYNTHETIC GENETIC ARRAY; YEAST; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; CATALYSIS; CHROMOSOME; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGUS MUTANT; GENE CONSTRUCT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOCUS; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE GENETICS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME SIZE; DOUBLE STRAND BREAKS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOMICS; MEIOSIS; REC8; RECOMBINATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SPO11; SYNTHETIC GENETIC ARRAY (SGA); YEAST;

CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; CROSSING OVER, GENETIC; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME, FUNGAL; MEIOSIS; MUTATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84885761769     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21601836     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/g3.113.007377     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bardhan, A., H. Chuong, and D. S. Dawson, 2010 Meiotic cohesin promotes pairing of nonhomologous centromeres in early meiotic prophase. Mol. Biol. Cell 21: 1799-1809.
2. Baryshnikova, A., M. Costanzo, S. Dixon, F. J. Vizeacoumar, C. L. Myers et al., 2010a Synthetic genetic array (SGA) analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 470: 145-179.
3. Baryshnikova, A., M. Costanzo, Y. Kim, H. Ding, J. Koh et al., 2010b Quantitative analysis of fitness and genetic interactions in yeast on a genome scale. Nat. Methods 7: 1017-1024.
4. Baudat, F., and A. Nicolas, 1997 Clustering of meiotic double-strand breaks on yeast chromosome III. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 5213-5218.
5. Bergerat, A., B. De Massy, D. Gadelle, P. C. Varoutas, A. Nicolas et al., 1997 An atypical topoisomerase II from Archaea with implications for meiotic recombination. Nature 386: 414-417.
6. Bishop, D. K., and D. Zickler, 2004 Early decision; meiotic crossover interference prior to stable strand exchange and synapsis. Cell 117: 9-15.
7. Blat, Y., and N. Kleckner, 1999 Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms vs. the centric region. Cell 98: 249-259.
8. Blitzblau, H. G., G. W. Bell, J. Rodriguez, S. P. Bell, and A. Hochwagen, 2007 Mapping of meiotic single-stranded DNA reveals doublestranded-break hotspots near centromeres and telomeres. Curr. Biol. 17: 2003-2012.
9. Borde, V., W. Lin, E. Novikov, J. H. Petrini, M. Lichten et al., 2004 Association of Mre11p with double-strand break sites during yeast meiosis. Mol. Cell 13: 389-401.
10. Brar, G. A., and A. Amon, 2008 Emerging roles for centromeres in meiosis I chromosome segregation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9: 899-910.
11. Buhler, C., V. Borde, and M. Lichten, 2007 Mapping meiotic single-strand DNA reveals a new landscape of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 5: e324.
12. Chen, S. Y., T. Tsubouchi, B. Rockmill, J. S. Sandler, D. R. Richards et al., 2008 Global analysis of the meiotic crossover landscape. Dev. Cell 15: 401-415.
13. Cherry, J. M., E. L. Hong, C. Amundsen, R. Balakrishnan, G. Binkley et al., 2012 Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 40: D700-D705.
14. Collins, S. R., M. Schuldiner, N. J. Krogan, and J. S. Weissman, 2006 A strategy for extracting and analyzing large-scale quantitative epistatic interaction data. Genome Biol. 7: R63.
15. Costanzo, M., A. Baryshnikova, J. Bellay, Y. Kim, E. D. Spear et al., 2010 The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327: 425-431.
16. Eckert, C. A., D. J. Gravdahl, and P. C. Megee, 2007 The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension. Genes Dev. 21: 278-291.
17. Fledel-Alon, A., D. J. Wilson, K. Broman, X. Wen, C. Ober et al., 2009 Broad-scale recombination patterns underlying proper disjunction in humans. PLoS Genet. 5: e1000658.
18. Gerton, J. L., J. Derisi, R. Shroff, M. Lichten, P. O. Brown et al., 2000 Global mapping of meiotic recombination hotspots and coldspots in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11383-11390.
19. Glynn, E. F., P. C. Megee, H. G. Yu, C. Mistrot, E. Unal et al., 2004 Genomewide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2: E259.
20. Griffiths, A. J. F., J. H. Miller, D. T. Suzuki, R. C. Lewontin, and W. M. Gelbart, 2000 Accurate calculation of large map distances, An Introduction to Genetic Analysis, Ed. 7. W. H. Freeman, New York.
21. Hartl, D. L., and E. W. Jones, 2009 Genetics. Analysis of Genes and Genomes, Ed. VII. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA.
22. Hassold, T., H. Hall, and P. Hunt, 2007 The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Human Mol. Genet. 16(Spec No. 2): R203-208.
23. Jones, G. H., 1987 Chiasmata, pp. 213-244 in Meiosis, edited by P. B. Moens. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
24. Kaback, D. B., 1996 Chromosome-size dependent control of meiotic recombination in humans. Nat. Genet. 13: 20-21.
25. Kaback, D. B., V. Guacci, D. Barber, and J. W. Mahon, 1992 Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic recombination. Science 256: 228-232.
26. Kaback, D. B., D. Barber, J. Mahon, J. Lamb, and J. You, 1999 Chromosome size-dependent control of meiotic reciprocal recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of crossover interference. Genetics 152: 1475-1486.
27. Keeney, S., C. N. Giroux, and N. Kleckner, 1997 Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375-384.
28. Kegel, A., H. Betts-Lindroos, T. Kanno, K. Jeppsson, L. Strom et al., 2011 Chromosome length influences replication-induced topological stress. Nature 471: 392-396.
29. Kiburz, B. M., D. B. Reynolds, P. C. Megee, A. L. Marston, B. H. Lee et al., 2005 The core centromere and Sgo1 establish a 50-kb cohesin-protected domain around centromeres during meiosis I. Genes Dev. 19: 3017- 3030.
30. Koehler, K. E., C. L. Boulton, H. E. Collins, R. L. French, K. C. Herman et al., 1996 Spontaneous X chromosome MI and MII nondisjunction events in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes have different recombinational histories. Nat. Genet. 14: 406-414.
31. Kugou, K., T. Fukuda, S. Yamada, M. Ito, H. Sasanuma et al., 2009 Rec8 guides canonical Spo11 distribution along yeast meiotic chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 20: 3064-3076.
32. Lacefield, S., and A. W. Murray, 2007 The spindle checkpoint rescues the meiotic segregation of chromosomes whose crossovers are far from the centromere. Nat. Genet. 39: 1273-1277.
33. Lichten, M., and A. S. Goldman, 1995 Meiotic recombination hotspots. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29: 423-444.
34. Mancera, E., R. Bourgon, A. Brozzi, W. Huber, and L. M. Steinmetz, 2008 High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454: 479-485.
35. Morton, N. E., 2004 History of genetic mapping, pp. X-X, in Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
36. Niu, H., L. Wan, B. Baumgartner, D. Schaefer, J. Loidl et al., 2005 Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16: 5804-5818.
37. Pan, J., M. Sasaki, R. Kniewel, H. Murakami, H. G. Blitzblau et al., 2011 A hierarchical combination of factors shapes the genome-wide topography of yeast meiotic recombination initiation. Cell 144: 719-731.
38. Pinsky, B. A., and S. Biggins, 2005 The spindle checkpoint: tension vs. attachment. Trends Cell Biol. 15: 486-493.
39. Riles, L., J. E. Dutchik, A. Baktha, B. K. Mccauley, E. C. Thayer et al., 1993 Physical maps of the six smallest chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at a resolution of 2.6 kilobase pairs. Genetics 134: 81-150.
40. Rockmill, B., K. Voelkel-Meiman, and G. S. Roeder, 2006 Centromereproximal crossovers are associated with precocious separation of sister chromatids during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 174: 1745-1754.
41. Ross, L. O., R. Maxfield, and D. Dawson, 1996 Exchanges are not equally able to enhance meiotic chromosome segregation in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 4979-4983.
42. Schwacha, A., and N. Kleckner, 1994 Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Cell 76: 51-63.
43. Shonn, M. A., R. Mccarroll, and A. W. Murray, 2000 Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289: 300-303.
44. Stahl, F. W., H. M. Foss, L. S. Young, R. H. Borts, M. F. Abdullah et al., 2004 Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics 168: 35-48.
45. Sturtevant, A. H., 1913 A linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila, as shown by their mode of association. J. Exp. Zool. 14: 43-59.