Effects of Awareness on Numerosity Adaptation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Liu, Wei ^a   Zhang, Zhi Jun ^a   Zhao, Ya Jun ^b   Liu, Zhi Fang ^c   Li, Bing Chen ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY FOR NATIONALITIES   (China)

^c NINGBO UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BINOCULAR VISION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTEROCULAR TRANSFER; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AWARENESS; FEMALE; HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885739452     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077556     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Kramer P, Bono M-D, Zorzi M, (2011) Numerosity estimation in visual stimuli in the absence of luminance-based cues. PLOS ONE 6(2):: e17378. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017378. PubMed: 21387017.
2. Ross J, Burr DC, (2010) Vision sense number directly. J Vis 10(2):: 1-8. doi:10.1167/10.2.11.
3. Franconeri SL, Bemis DK, Alvarez GA, (2009) Number estimation relies on a set segmented objects. Cognition 113: 1-13. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.002. PubMed: 19647817.
4. Allik J, Tuulmets T, Vos PG, (1991) Size invariance in visual number discrimination. Psychol Res 53(4):: 290-295. doi:10.1007/BF00920482. PubMed: 1792300.
5. Ariely D, (2001) Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychol Sci 12(2):: 157-162. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00327. PubMed: 11340926.
6. Chong SC, Treisman A, (2003) Representation of statistic properties. Vision Res 43: 393-404. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00596-5. PubMed: 12535996.
7. Durgin FH, (2008) Text density adaptation and visual number revisited. Curr Biol 18: 855-856. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.026. PubMed: 18514515.
8. Burr DC, Ross J, (2008) A visual sense of number. Curr Biol 18: 425-428. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2008.02.003. PubMed: 18342507.
9. Roitman JD, Brannon EM, Platt ML, (2007) Monotonic coding of numerosity in macaque lateral intraparietal area. PLOS Biol 5: e208. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050208. PubMed: 17676978.
10. Dehaene S, Spelke E, Pinel P, Stanescu R, Tsivkin S, (1999) Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. Science 284: 970-974. doi:10.1126/science.284.5416.970. PubMed: 10320379.
11. Castelli F, Glaser DE, Butterworth B, (2006) Discrete and analogue quantity processing in the parietal lobe: a functional MRI study. National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103: 4693-4698.
12. de Hevia MD, (2011) Sensitivity to number: Replay to Gebuis & Gevers. Cognition 121: 253-255. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.002. PubMed: 23559681.
13. Sophian C, Chu Y, (2008) How do people apprehend large numerosities? Cognition 107: 460-478. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.10.009. PubMed: 18082157.
14. He L, Zhang J, Zhou T, Chen L, (2009) Connectedness affects dot numerosity judgment: Implications for configural processing. Psychon Bull Rev 16: 509-517. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.3.509. PubMed: 19451377.
15. Allik J, Tuulmets T, (1991) Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Percept Psychophys 44: 303-314. PubMed: 2030927.
16. Dehaene S, Changeux J-P, (1993) Development of elementary numerical abilities: a neural model. J Cogn Neurosci 5: 390-407. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.4.390. PubMed: 23964915.
17. Gallistel CR, Gelman R, (2000) Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends Cogn Sci 4: 59-65. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01424-2. PubMed: 10652523.
18. Chen L, (2005) The topological approach to perceptual organization. Vis Cogn 12: 553-637. doi:10.1080/13506280444000256.
19. Liu W, Zhang ZJ, Zhao YJ, (2012) Numerosity adaptation effect on the basis of perceived numerosity. Acta Psychol Sin (In Chinese) 44(9): 1-13.
20. Sweeny TD, Grabowecky M, Suzuki S, (2011) Awareness becomes necessary between adaptive pattern coding of open and closed curvatures. Psychol Sci 22(7):: 943-950. doi:10.1177/0956797611413292. PubMed: 21690314.
21. Dehaene S, Changeux J-P, Naccache L, Sackur J, Sergent C, (2006) Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends Cogn Sci 10(5):: 204-211. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007. PubMed: 16603406.
22. Kouider S, Dehaene S, (2007) Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual mask. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 362(1481): 857-875.
23. Durgin FH, Proffitt DR, (1996) Visual learning in the perception of texture: simple and contingent aftereffects of texture density. Spat Vis 9(4):: 423-474. doi:10.1163/156856896X00204. PubMed: 8774089.
24. Blake R, Tadin D, Sobel KV, Raissian TA, Chong SC, (2006) Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 4783-4788. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509634103. PubMed: 16537384.
25. Moradi F, Koch C, Shimojo S, (2005) Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 45: 169-175. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.018. PubMed: 15629711.
26. Yang E, Hong S-W, Blake R, (2010) Adaptation aftereffects to facial expressions suppressed from visual awareness. J Vis 10(12):: 1,-13. doi:10.1167/10.12.1. PubMed: 21047733.
27. Amihai I, Deouell L, Bentin S, (2011) Conscious awareness is necessary for processing race and gender information from faces. Conscious Cogn 20(2):: 269-279. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.08.004. PubMed: 20843704.
28. Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangun GR, (2008) Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind (3rd ed). New York: Norton.
29. Durgin FH, (2001) Texture contrast aftereffects are monocular; texture density aftereffects are binocular. Vision Res 41: 2619-2630. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00121-3. PubMed: 11520508.
30. Harris JJ, Schwarzkopf DS, Chen S, Bahrami B, Rees G, (2011) Contextual illusions reveal the limit of unconscious visual processing. Psychol Sci 22(3):: 399-405. doi:10.1177/0956797611399293. PubMed: 21317371.
31. Palmer SE, Brooks JL, Nelson R, (2003) When does grouping happen? Acta Psychol 114: 311-330. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.06.003. PubMed: 14670702.
32. Moradi F, Koch C, Shimojo S, (2005) Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 45: 169-175. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.018. PubMed: 15629711.
33. Tsuchiya N, Koch C, (2005) Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nat Neurosci 8: 1096-1101. doi:10.1038/nn1500. PubMed: 15995700.
34. Doesburg SM, Green JJ, McDonald JJ, Ward LM, (2009) Rhythms of consciousness: Binocular rivalry reveals large-scale oscillatory network dynamics mediating visual perception. PLOS ONE 4(7):: e6142. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006142. PubMed: 19582165.
35. Fries P, Roelfsema PR, Engel AK, König P, Singer W, (1997) Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry. Proc Natl Acad Sci U_S_A 94: 12699-12704. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.23.12699. PubMed: 9356513.
36. Wilke M, Logothetis NK, Leopold DA, (2006) Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U_S_A 103: 17507-17512. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604673103. PubMed: 17088545.
37. Macknik SL, Martinez-Conde S, (2004) Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: Implications for binocular vision and visual awareness. J Cogn Neurosci 16: l049-1059. PubMed: 15298791.
38. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK, (1999) Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends Cogn Sci 3: 254-264. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01332-7. PubMed: 10377540.
39. Sweeny TD, Grabowecky M, Kim YJ, Suzuki S, (2011) Internal curvature signal and noise in low- and high-level vision. J Neurophysiol 105: 1236-1257. doi:10.1152/jn.00061.2010. PubMed: 21209356.
40. Dehaene S, Izard V, Spelke E, Pica P, (2008) Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320(5580):: 1217-1220.
41. Roth HL, Lora AN, Heilman KM, (2002) Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention. Brain 125(9):: 2023-2035. doi:10.1093/brain/awf210. PubMed: 12183348.
42. Wichmann FA, Hill NJ, (2001) The psychometric function. I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Percept Psychophys 63: 1293-1313. doi:10.3758/BF03194544. PubMed: 11800458.
43. Nieder A, Dehaene S, (2009) Representation of number in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 32: 185-208. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550. PubMed: 19400715.
44. Burr DC, Morrone MC, (2011) Spatiotopic coding and remapping in humans. Philos Trans R Soc B 366: 504-515. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0244. PubMed: 21242139.
45. Walk RD, (1966) The development of depth perception in animals and human infants. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 31: 82-108. doi:10.2307/1165648. PubMed: 4960432.
46. Halberda J, Sires SF, Feigenson L, (2006) Multiple spatially overlapping sets can be enumerated in parallel. Psychol Sci 17: 572-576. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01746.x. PubMed: 16866741.
47. Sang CC, Karla KE, (2010) Distributed versus focused attention (count vs estimate). WIREs. Cogn Sci 10: 1002.
48. Burr DC, Anobile G, Turi M, (2011) Adaptation affects both high and low (subitized) numbers under conditions of high attentional load. Seeing Perceiving 24(2):: 141-150. doi:10.1163/187847511X570097. PubMed: 21864455.
49. Verguts T, Fias W, (2004) Representation of number in animals and humans: a neural model. J Cogn Neurosci 16: l493-1504. PubMed: 15601514.