Awareness Becomes Necessary Between Adaptive Pattern Coding of Open and Closed Curvatures

Psychological Science

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 943-950

  Sweeny, Timothy D ^a   Grabowecky, Marcia ^b   Suzuki, Satoru ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

awareness; pattern adaptation; visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AWARENESS; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 79960461408     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797611413292     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Azouz R.,Gray C.M.Dynamic spike threshold reveals a mechanism for synaptic coincidence detection in cortical neurons in vivo.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2000;97:8110-8115.
2. Biederman I.Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review. 1987;94:115-147.
3. Blake R.,Tadin D.,Sobel K. V.,Raissian T. A.,Chong S. C.Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2006;103:4783-4788.
4. Bonneh Y. S.,Cooperman A.,Sagi D.Motion-induced blindness in normal observers.Nature. 2001;411:798-801.
5. Clifford C. W. G.,Webster M. A.,Stanley G. B.,Stocker A. A.,Kohn A.,Sharpee T. O.,Schwartz O.Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects.Vision Research. 2007;47:3125-3131.
6. DickinsonJ. E.AlmeidaR. A.BellJ.BadcockD.R. (2010). Global shape aftereffects have a local substrate: A tilt aftereffect field. Journal of Vision, 10(13), Article 5. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/13/5.full.
7. Doesburg S. M.,Green J. J.,McDonald J. J.,Ward L. M.Rhythms of consciousness: Binocular rivalry reveals large-scale oscillatory network dynamics mediating visual perception.PLoS ONE. 2009;4 (7): e6142.
8. Dumoulin S. O.,Hess R. F.Cortical specialization for concentric shape processing.Vision Research. 2007;47:1608-1613.
9. Elder J.,Zucker S.The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes.Vision Research. 1992;33:981-991.
10. Fang F.,He S.Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways.Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8:1380-1385.
11. Fries P.,Roelfsema P. R.,Engel A. K.,Konig P.,Singer W.Synchronization of oscillatory responses in visual cortex correlates with perception in interocular rivalry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 1997;94:12699-12704.
12. Gail A.,Brinksmeyer H. J.,Eckhorn R.Perception-related modulations of local field potential power and coherence in primary visual cortex of awake monkey during binocular rivalry.Cerebral Cortex. 2004;14:300-313.
13. Gheorghiu E.,Kingdom F. A.The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects.Vision Research. 2007;47:834-844.
14. Goodale M. A.,Westwood D. A.An evolving view of duplex vision: Separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action.Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2004;14:203-211.
15. Hegdé J.,Van Essen D. C.A comparative study of shape representation in macaque visual areas V2 and V4.Cerebral Cortex. 2007;17:1100-1116.
16. Ishai A.,Ungerleider L. G.,Martin A.,Schouten J. L.,Haxby J. V.Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 1999;96:9379-9384.
17. Jiang Y.,Costello P.,Fang F.,Huang M.,He S.A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2006;103:17048-17052.
18. Koffka K.Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World; 1935:.
19. Kovács I.,Julesz B.A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: Effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 1993;90:7495-7497.
20. Leopold D. A.,Logothetis N. K.Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1999;3:254-264.
21. Loffler G.Perception of contours and shapes: Low and intermediate stage mechanisms.Vision Research. 2008;48:2106-2127.
22. Logothetis N. K.Single units and conscious vision.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 1998;353:1801-1818.
23. Macknik S. L.,Martinez-Conde S.Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: Implications for binocular vision and visual awareness.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2004;16:1049-1059.
24. Moradi F.,Koch C.,Shimojo S.Face adaptation depends on seeing the face.Neuron. 2005;45:169-175.
25. Orban G. A.Higher order visual processing in macaque extrastriate cortex.Physiological Reviews. 2008;88:59-89.
26. PaoH.GeigerD.RubinN. (1999). Measuring convexity for figure/ground separation. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (Vol. 2, pp. 948-955). doi:10.1109/ICCV.1999.790350. (Available from IEEE Xplore Digital Library: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=790350).
27. Pasupathy A.,Connor C. E.Population coding of shape in area V4.Nature Neuroscience. 2002;5:1332-1338.
28. Regan D.,Hamstra S. J.Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size.Vision Research. 1992;32:1845-1864.
29. Saarinen J.,Levi D. M.Effect of contour closure on shape perception.Spatial Vision. 1999;12:227-238.
30. Schwartz O.,Hsu A.,Dayan P.Space and time in visual context.Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2007;8:522-535.
31. Simons D. J.Attentional capture and inattentional blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000;4:147-155.
32. Stevens K. A.,Brookes A.Detecting structure by symbolic constructions on tokens.Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing. 1987;37:238-260.
33. Suzuki S.Advances in visual cognition: Vol. 2. Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision. Clifford C.Rhodes G., ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2005:135-172.
34. Suzuki S.,Cavanagh P.A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1998;24:1315-1341.
35. Sweeny T. D.,Grabowecky M.,Kim Y. J.,Suzuki S.Internal curvature signal and noise in low- and high-level vision.Journal of Neurophysiology. 2011;105:1236-1257.
36. Tsuchiya N.,Koch C.Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages.Nature Neuroscience. 2005;8:1096-1101.
37. Wilke M.,Logothetis N. K.,Leopold D. A.Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2006;103:17507-17512.
38. Wilson H. R.Discrimination of contour curvature: Data and theory.Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 1985;2:1191-1199.
39. YangE.HongS.-W.BlakeR. (2010). Adaptation aftereffects to facial expressions suppressed from visual awareness. Journal of Vision, 10(12), Article 24. Retrieved from http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/12/24.full.
40. Young M. P.,Yamane S.Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex.Science. 1992;256:1327-1331.