Seeing Sets: Representation by Statistical Properties

Psychological Science

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 157-162

  Ariely, Dan ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035290015     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00327     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ariely, D. (1998). Combining experiences over time: The effects of duration, intensity changes and on-line measurements on retrospective pain evaluations. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 19-45.
2. Atchley, P., & Andersen, G. (1995). Discrimination of speed distributions: Sensitivity to statistical properties. Vision Research, 35, 3131-3144.
3. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychology Review, 94, 115-147.
4. Coren, S., & Miller, J. (1974). Size contrast as a function of figural similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 355-357.
5. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
6. Finney, D.J. (1971). Probit analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W.D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface and spatial object representations. Psychological Review, 101, 470-489.
8. Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper and Row.
9. Hering, E. (1964). Outlines of a theory of the light sense (L.M. Hurvich & D. Jameson, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Hsee, C.K., & Abelson, R.P. (1991). Velocity relation: Satisfaction as a function of the first derivative of outcome over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 341-347.
11. Julesz, B. (1995). Dialogues on perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Kahneman, D. (2000). Evaluation by moments: Past and future. In D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (Eds.). Choices, values and frames (pp. 699-708). New York: Cambridge University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
13. Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B.L., Schreiber, C.A., & Redelmeier, D.A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401-405.
14. Mach, E. (1959). The analysis of sensation. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1914)
15. Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.). Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 135-149). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
17. Rosenholtz, R. (1999). A simple saliency model predicts a number of motion popout phenomena. Vision Research, 39, 3157-3163.
18. Treisman, A. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 652-676.
19. Watamaniuk, S.N.J., & Duchon, A. (1992). The human visual system averages speed information. Vision Research, 32, 931-942.
20. Watson, A.B. (1987). The cortex transform: Rapid computation of simulated neural images. Computer Vision, Graphics, Image Processing, 39, 311-327.
21. Wolfe, J.M., Cave, K.R., & Franzel, S.L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433.