Representation of statistical properties

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 393-404

  Chong, Sang Chul ^a   Treisman, Anne ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mean; Perception; Size; Statistical properties

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; SIZE PERCEPTION; STATISTICS;

EID: 0037303322     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00596-5     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ariely D. Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science. 12:2001;157-162.
2. Ariely D., Burbeck C.A. Statistical encoding of multiple stimuli: a theory of distributed representation. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 36(Suppl.):1995;8472. (Abstract).
3. Barlow H.B. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. Rosenblith W.A. Sensory communication. 1961;217-234 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Brenner N., Bialek W., de Ruyter van Steveninck R. Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron. 26:2000;695-702.
5. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2000). Effects of divided attention on the representation of a visual scene. Paper was presented at '00 OPAM, New Orleans.
6. Dakin S.C. The detection of structure in glass patterns: psychophysics and computational models. Vision Research. 37:1997;2227-2246.
7. Dakin S.C., Watt R.J. The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture. Vision Research. 37:1997;3181-3192.
8. Davidson M.L., Fox M.J., Dick A.O. Effect of eye movements on backward masking and perceived location. Perception & Psychophysics. 14:1973;110-116.
9. De Bruyn B., Orban G.A. Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns. Vision Research. 28:1988;1323-1335.
10. Finney D.J. Probit analysis. 1971;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
11. Haralick R.M., Shanmugam K., Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 3:1973;610-621.
12. He S., Cavanagh P., Intriligator J. Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature. 383:1996;334-337.
13. Heeley D.W., Buchanan-Smith H.M. Recognition of stimulus orientation. Vision Research. 30:1990;1429-1437.
14. Hochberg J.E. Perception. 1978;Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
15. Hock H.S., Schmelzkopf K.F. The abstraction of schematic representations from photographs of real-world scenes. Memory & Cognition. 8(6):1980;543-554.
16. Irwin D.E. Information integration across saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology. 23:1991;420-456.
17. Julesz B. Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature. 290:1981;91-97.
18. Müller J.R., Metha A.B., Krauskopf J., Lennie P. Rapid adaptation to visual cortex to the structure of images. Science. 285:1999;1405-1408.
19. Nothdurft, H. C. (1990). Texton segregation by associated differences in global and local luminance distribution. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 239 (pp. 295-320).
20. Nothdurft H.C. Different approaches to the encoding of visual segmentation. Harris L., Jenkins M. Computational and psychophysical mechanisms of visual segmentation. 1997;20-43 Cambridge University Press, New York.
21. Parkes L., Lund J., Angelucci A., Solomon J.A., Morgan M. Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision. Nature Neuroscience. 4:2001;739-744.
22. Pasternak T., Albano J.E., Harvitt D.M. The role of directionally selective neurons in the perception of global motion. The Journal of Neuroscience. 10:1990;3079-3086.
23. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science. 8(5):1997;368-373.
24. Rubenstein B.S., Sagi D. Spatial variability as a limiting factor in texture discrimination tasks: implications for performance asymmetries. Journal of Optical Society of America A. 7:1990;1632-1643.
25. Simoncelli E.P., Olshausen B.A. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 24:2001;1193-1216.
26. Smirnakis S.M., Berry M.J., Warland D.K., Bialek W., Meister M. Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale. Nature. 386:1997;69-73.
27. Snowden R.J., Braddick O.J. The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals. Vision Research. 31(5):1991;907-914.
28. Stevens S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review. 64:1957;153-181.
29. Teghtsoonian M. The judgment of size. American Journal of Psychology. 78:1965;392-402.
30. Treisman A. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;652-676.
31. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 16:1980;97-136.
32. Treisman A., Gormican S. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review. 95:1988;15-48.
33. Treue S., Hol K., Rauber H.-J. Seeing multiple directions of motion - physiology and psychophysics. Nature Neuroscience. 3:2000;270-276.
34. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Duchon A. The human visual system averages speed information. Vision Research. 32:1992;931-941.
35. Watamaniuk S.N.J., Sekuler R., Williams D.W. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: the integration of direction information. Vision Research. 29:1989;47-59.
36. Williams D.W., Sekuler R. Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions. Vision Research. 24:1984;55-62.
37. Wolfe J.M., Cave K.R., Franzel S.L. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;419-433.