Primary school students' strategies in early algebra problem solving supported by an online game

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 281-307

  van den Heuvel Panhuizen, Marja ^a   Kolovou, Angeliki ^a   Robitzsch, Alexander ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b BIFIE   (Austria)

Author keywords

Dynamic game; Early algebra; Online learning environment; Primary school mathematics; Strategy profiles

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885663668     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-013-9483-5     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Al-Murani, T. (2006). Teachers' awareness of dimensions of variation: A mathematics intervention project. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 2, pp. 25-32). Prague, Czech Republic: PME.
2. Beatty, R. A. (2010). Pattern rules, patterns, and graphs: Analyzing grade 6 students' learning of linear functions through the processes of webbing, situated abstractions, and convergent conceptual change (Doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada. Retrieved on June 18, 2012, from https://tspace. library. utoronto. ca/handle/1807/26347.
3. Bétrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 287-296). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2004). Elementary grades students' capacity for functional thinking. In M. Jonsen, M. J. Høines, & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 2, pp. 135-142). Bergen, Norway: PME.
5. Bokhove, C., & Drijvers, P. (2012). Effects of a digital intervention on the development of algebraic expertise. Computers in Education, 58(1), 197-208.
6. Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematics generalization. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 3-22.
7. Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (vol. 2, pp. 669-705). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
8. Caspi, S., & Sfard, A. (2012). Spontaneous meta-arithmetic as a first step toward school algebra. International Journal of Educational Research, 51-52, 45-65.
9. Cheung, A., & Slavin, R. E. (2011). The effectiveness of educational technology applications for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research and Reform in Education. Retrieved on May 23, 2012, from http://www. bestevidence. org. uk/assets/tech_maths_july_2011. pdf.
10. De Jong, T. (2005). The guided discovery principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 215-228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Elia, I., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kolovou, A. (2009). Exploring strategy use and strategy flexibility in non-routine problem solving by primary school high achievers in mathematics. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41, 605-618.
12. Goldenberg, E. P., Shteingold, N., & Feurzeig, N. (2003). Mathematical habits of mind for young children. In F. K. Lester & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten-grade 6 (pp. 15-29). Reston, VA: NCTM.
13. Harel, G. (2008). What is mathematics? a pedagogical answer to a philosophical question. In B. Gold & R. A. Simons (Eds.), Proof and other dilemmas: Mathematics and philosophy (pp. 265-290). Washington, DC: Mathematical American Association.
14. Hays, R. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instructional games: A literature review and discussion (Technical Report No. 2005-004). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division. Retrieved on May 23, 2012, from http://www. dtic. mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA441935%26Location=U2%26doc=GetTRDoc. pdf.
15. Hewitt, D. (2012). Young students learning formal algebraic notation and solving linear equations: Are commonly experienced difficulties avoidable? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(2), 139-159.
16. Holton, D. D., Ahmed, A., Williams, H., & Hill, C. (2010). On the importance of mathematical play. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(3), 401-415.
17. Hoyles, C., & Sutherland, R. (1989). Logo mathematics in the classroom. London: Routledge.
18. Humberstone, J., & Reeve, R. A. (2008). Profiles of algebraic competence. Learning and Instruction, 18, 354-367.
19. Kaput, J. J. (1999). Teaching and learning a new algebra. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 133-155). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? what is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5-18). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Kaput, J. J., Carraher, D. W., & Blanton, M. L. (Eds.). (2008). Algebra in the early grades. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers in Education, 55(2), 427-443.
23. Kieran, C. (1996). The changing face of school algebra. In C. Alsina, J. Alvarez, B. Hodgson, C. Laborde, & A. Pérez (Eds.), 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Selected lectures (pp. 271-290). Seville, Spain: S. A. E. M. Thales.
24. Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it? The Mathematics Educator, 8, 139-151.
25. Kieran, C. (2007). Learning and teaching algebra at the middle school through college levels: Building meaning for symbols and their manipulation. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (vol. 2, pp. 707-762). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
26. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
27. Klawe, M. M. (1998). When does the use of computer games and other interactive multimedia software help students learn mathematics? Paper presented at Technology and NCTM Standards 2000 Conference, Arlington. Retrieved on June 26, 2012, from http://mathforum. org/technology/papers/papers/klawe. html.
28. Kolovou, A., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2010). Online game-generated feedback as a way to support early algebraic reasoning. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 20(2), 224-238.
29. Kolovou, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Bakker, A. (2009). Non-routine problem solving tasks in primary school mathematics textbooks-a needle in a haystack. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 8(2), 31-67.
30. Kolovou, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Bakker, A., & Elia, I. (2008). An ICT environment to assess and support students' mathematical problem-solving performance in non-routine puzzle-like word problems. In A. Gagatsis (Ed.), Research in mathematics education (pp. 175-190). Nicosia, Cyprus: University of Cyprus.
31. Kolovou, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Köller, O. (2013). An intervention including an online game to improve grade 6 students' performance in early algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(3), 510-545.
32. Lannin, J. (2005). Generalization and justification: The challenge of introducing algebraic reasoning through patterning activities. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(3), 231-258.
33. Levin, M. (2008). The potential for developing algebraic thinking through purposeful guessing and checking. In G. Kanselaar, J. van Merriënboer, P. Kirschner, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, (vol. 1, pp. 469-476). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
34. Li, Q., & Ma, X. (2010). A meta-analysis of the effects of computer technology on school students' mathematics learning. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 215-243.
35. Li, J., Peng, A., & Song, N. (2011). Teaching algebraic equations with variation in Chinese classroom. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization. A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 529-556). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
36. Lowe, R. K. (2004). Animation and learning: Value for money? In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 558-561). Perth, Australia: ASCILITE. Retrieved 16 February, 2011, from http://www. ascilite. org. au/conferences/perth04/procs/lowe-r. html.
37. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
38. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. B. M. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Mason, J. (1980). When is a symbol symbolic? For the Learning of Mathematics, 1(2), 8-12.
41. Mitchell, A., & Savill-Smith, C. (2004). The use of computer and video games for learning: A review of the literature. London: Learning and Skills Development Agency.
42. Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2006). Knowledge building in mathematics: Supporting collaborative learning in pattern problems. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 441-466.
43. Nathan, M. J. (1998). Knowledge and situational feedback in a learning environment for algebra story problem solving. Interactive Learning Environments, 5, 135-159.
44. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
45. Oldfield, B. J. (1991). Games in the learning of mathematics 1: A classification. Mathematics in School, 20(1), 41-43.
46. Radford, L. (2010). Signs, gestures, meanings: Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 6) (pp. 33-53). Lyon, France: Université Claude Bernard.
47. Radford, L. (2012). Early algebraic thinking, epistemological, semiotic, and developmental issues. Regular lecture presented at the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education, held in Seoul, Korea, 8 July-15 July, 2012. Retrieved at July 2, 2012, from http://www. icme12. org/upload/submission/1942_F. pdf.
48. Rakes, C. R., Valentine, J. C., McGatha, M., & Ronau, R. N. (2010). Methods of instructional improvement in algebra: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 372-400.
49. Randel, J., Morris, B., Wetzel, C., & Whitehill, B. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3), 261-276.
50. Roschelle, J. M., Pea, R. D., Hoadley, C. M., Gordin, D. N., & Means, B. M. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101.
51. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36.
52. Schliemann, A. D., Carraher, D. W., & Brizuela, B. M. (2001). When tables become function tables. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 4, pp. 145-152). Utrecht, the Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.
53. Sedighian, K., & Sedighian, A. (1996). Can educational computer games help educators learn about the psychology of learning mathematics in children? In E. Jakubowski, D. Watkins, & H. Biske (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (vol. 2, pp. 573-578). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
54. Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective programs in elementary mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 427-515.
55. Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133-160). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Smith, J. P., III, & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95-132). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
57. Suh, J., & Moyer, P. S. (2007). Developing students' representational fluency using virtual and physical algebra balances. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(2), 155-173.
58. Sun, X. H. (2011). Variation problems and their roles in the topic of fraction division in Chinese mathematics textbook examples. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 65-85.
59. Warren, E. A., Cooper, T. J., & Lamb, J. T. (2006). Investigating functional thinking in the elementary classroom: Foundations of early algebraic reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25(3), 208-223.
60. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2006). Seeing an exercise as a single mathematical object: Using variation to structure sense-making. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(2), 91-111.
61. Zbiek, R., Heid, M., Blume, G., & Dick, T. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: The perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (vol. 2, pp. 1169-1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.