Young students learning formal algebraic notation and solving linear equations: Are commonly experienced difficulties avoidable?

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 139-159

  Hewitt, Dave ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Algebra; Computers; Misconceptions; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865988683     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-012-9394-x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2004). Elementary grades students' capacity for functional thinking. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2 (pp. 135-142). Bergan, Norway: PME.
2. Carraher, D., Schliemann, A., Brizuela, B., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87-115.
3. Carraher, D., Schliemann, A. D., & Brizuela, B. M. (2001). Can young students operate on unknowns? In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 1) (pp. 130-140). Utrecht, The Netherlands: PME.
4. Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., Sarama, J., Swaminathan, S., & McMillen, S. (1997). Students' development of length concepts in a Logo-based unit on geometric paths. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 28(1), 70-95.
5. Collis, K. F. (1974). Cognitive development and mathematics learning. Paper presented at the Psychology of Mathematics Workshop. Centre for Science Education: Chelsea College, London.
6. Collis, K. F. (1975). The development of formal reasoning. Report of a Social Science Research Council sponsored project (HR 2434/1). Newcastle, NSW, Australia: University of Newcastle.
7. Cooper, T. J., Boulton-Lewis, G. M., Atwah, B., Pillay, H., Wilss, L., & Mutch, S. (1997). The transition from arithmetic to algebra: Initial understanding of equals, operations and variable. In E. Pehkonen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 21st conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 2 (pp. 89-96). Lahti, Finland: PME.
8. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process scheme. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167-192.
9. Davydov, V. V. (1975). Logical and psychological problems of elementary mathematics as an academic subject. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Children's capacity for learning mathematics. Soviet studies in the psychology of learning and teaching mathematics, Vol. VII (pp. 55-107). Chicago: University of Chicago.
10. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
11. Dougherty, B. J., & Zilliox, J. (2003). Voyaging from theory to practice in teaching and learning: A view from Hawai'i. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th conference of PME-NA, (Vol. 1) (pp. 17-23). Hawai'i, USA: PME.
12. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-123). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving equations, the transition from arithmetic to algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 19-25.
14. Glidden, P. L. (2008). Prospective elementary teachers' understanding of order of operations. School Science and Mathematics, 108(4), 130-136.
15. Gray, E. M., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity and flexibility: A proceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(2), 115-141.
16. Herscovics, N. (1989). Cognitive obstacles encountered in the learning of algebra. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 60-86). Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Herscovics, N., & Linchevski, L. (1994). A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27, 59-78.
18. Hewitt, D. (1996). Mathematical fluency: The nature of practice and the role of subordination. For the Learning of Mathematics, 16(2), 28-35.
19. Hewitt, D. (1999). Arbitrary and necessary: Part 1 a way of viewing the mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(3), 2-9.
20. Hewitt, D. (2001). Arbitrary and necessary: Part 2 assisting memory. For the Learning of Mathematics, 21(1), 44-51.
21. Hughes, M. (1990). Children and number. Difficulties in learning mathematics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
22. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317-326.
23. Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., McNeil, N. M., Weinberg, A., & Stephens, A. C. (2005). Middle school students' understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equivalence & variable. ZDM, 37(1), 68-76.
24. Küchemann, D. (1981). Algebra. In K. M. Hart (Ed.), Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16 (pp. 102-119). London: John Murray.
25. Lee, M. A., & Messner, S. J. (2000). Analysis of concatenations and order of operations in written mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 173-180.
26. Linsell, C., & Allan, R. (2010). Prerequisite skills for learning algebra. In M. M. F. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 3) (pp. 217-224). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
27. Ma, H.-L. (2009). Characterizing students' algebraic thinking in linear pattern with pictorial contents. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 49-56). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.
28. MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1997). Students' understanding of algebraic notation: 11-15. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 1-19.
29. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
30. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds. London: Routledge.
31. Radford, L. (2010). Elementary forms of algebraic thinking in young students. In M. M. Pinto & T. F. Kawasaki (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4 (pp. 73-80). Belo Horizonte, Brazil: PME.
32. Sáenz-Ludlow, A., & Walgamuth, C. (1998). Third graders' interpretations or equality and the equal symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 153-187.
33. Schliemann, A., Carraher, D., Brizuela, B., Earnest, D., Goodrow, A., Lara-Roth, S., & Peled, I. (2003). Algebra in elementary school. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education held jointly with the 25th conference of PME-NA, (Vol. 4) (pp. 127-134). Hawai'i, USA: PME.
34. Seeley Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
35. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1-36.
36. Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and pitfalls of reification-the case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 191-228.
37. Steffe, L. P., & Olive, J. (1996). Symbolizing as a constructive activity in a computer microworld. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 113-138.
38. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: SAGE publications Ltd.
39. Tahta, D. (1981). Some thoughts arising from the new Nicolet films. Mathematics Teaching, 94, 25-29.
40. Tall, D. (2004). Thinking through three worlds of mathematics. In M. J. Høines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 281-288). Bergan, Norway: PME.
41. Tall, D., & Thomas, M. (1991). Encouraging versatile thinking in algebra using the computer. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 125-147.
42. van Amerom, B. A. (2003). Focusing on informal strategies when linking arithmetic to early algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54(1), 63-75.
43. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.