Reconciling Phylogenetic Trees

Evolution after Gene Duplication

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 185-206

  Eulenstein, Oliver ^a   Huzurbazar, Snehalata ^b   Liberles, David A ^b  

^a Iowa State University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Episodes of gene duplications episode based gene duplication problems seeking to identify, and locate episodes of gene duplications on species tree; Reconciling phylogenetic trees assembling tree of life, challenges in computational biology, gene tree reconciliation based on principle of parsimony; Supertrees, and collection of phylogenetic trees not just identical taxa into one tree, evolutionary statements about joint taxa of input trees

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885562479     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470619902.ch10     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. Akerborg O, Sennblad B, Arvestad L, Lagergren J. 2009. Simultaneous bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 5714-5719.
2. Arvestad L, Berglund AC, Lagergren J, Sennblad B. 2003. Bayesian gene/species tree reconciliation and orthology analysis using MCMC. Bioinformatics 19(Suppl. 1): i7-i15.
3. Arvestad L, Berglund AC, Lagergren J, Sennblad B. 2004. Gene tree reconstruction and orthology analysis based on an integrated model for duplications and sequence evolution. In Bourne PE, Gusfield D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, San Diego, CA, Mar. 27-31, 2004, pp. 326-335.
4. Arvestad L, Lagergren J, Sennblad B. 2009. The gene evolution model and computing its associated probabilities. J ACM 56: 7.
5. Bansal MS, Eulenstein O. 2008a. The gene-duplication problem: near-linear time algorithms for NNI based local searches. In Mandoiu II, Sunderraman R, Zelikovsky A (eds.), ISBRA, Vol. 4983 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 14-25.
6. Bansal MS, Eulenstein O. 2008b. The multiple gene duplication problem revisited. Bioinformatics 24 i132-i1328.
7. 2/ log n) speed-up of TBR heuristics for the geneduplication problem. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 5: 514-524.
8. Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O, Wehe A. 2007. Heuristics for the gene-duplication problem: a Θ (n) speed-up for the local search. In Speed TP, Huang H (eds.), RECOMB, Vol. 4453 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 238-252.
9. Bansal MS, Shamir R. Submitted for publication. A note on the fixed parameter tractability of the gene-duplication problem. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioninf.
10. Baroni M, Grünewald S, Moulton V, Semple C. 2005. Bounding the number of hybridisation events for a consistent evolutionary history. J Math Biol 51: 171-182.
11. Behzadi B, Vingron M. 2006a. An improved algorithm for the macro-evolutionary phylogeny problem. In Lewenstein M, Valiente G (eds.), CPM, Vol. 4009 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 177-187.
12. Behzadi B, Vingron M. 2006b. Reconstructing domain compositions of ancestral multi-domain proteins. In Bourque G, El-Mabrouk N (eds.), Comparative Genomics Vol. 4205 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1-10.
13. Bender MA, Farach-Colton M. 2000. The LCA problem revisited. In Gonnet GH, Panario D, Viola A (eds.), LATIN , Vol. 1776 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 88-94.
14. Berglund-Sonnhammer AC, Steffansson P, Betts MJ, Liberles DA. 2006. Optimal gene trees from sequences and species trees using a soft interpretation of parsimony. J Mol Evol 63: 240-250.
15. Bininda-Emonds ORP. 2004. The evolution of supertrees. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 315-322.
16. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Gittleman JL, Steel MA. 2002. The (super)tree of life: procedures, problems, and prospects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33: 265-289.
17. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A. 2007. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446: 507-512.
18. Blanc G, Wolfe KH. 2004. Widespread paleopolyploidy in model plant species inferred from age distributions of duplicate genes. Plant Cell 16: 1667-1678.
19. Blanc G, Hokamp K, Wolfe KH. 2003. A recent polyploidy superimposed on older large-scale duplications in the Arabidopsis genome. Genome Res 13: 137-144.
20. Bonizzoni P, Della Vedova G, Dondi R. 2005. Reconciling a gene tree to a species tree under the duplication cost model. Theor Comput Sci 347: 36-53.
21. Bordewich M, Semple C. 2004. On the computational complexity of the rooted subtree prune and regraft distance. Ann Combinatorics 8409-423.
22. Bowers JE, Chapman BA, Rong J, Paterson AH. 2003. Unravelling angiosperm genome evolution by phylogenetic analysis of chromosomal duplication events. Nature 422: 433-438.
23. Burleigh JG, Bansal MS, Wehe A, Eulenstein O. 2008. Locating multiple gene duplications through reconciled trees. In Vingron M, Wong L (eds.), RECOMB, Vol. 4955 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 273-284.
24. Burleigh J, Bansal M, Wehe A, Eulenstein O. 2009. Locating large-scale gene duplication events through reconciled trees: implications for identifying ancient polyploidy events in plants. J Comput Biol 16: 1071-1083.
25. Cannon SB, Sterck L, Rombauts S, Sato S, Cheung F, Gouzy J, Wang X, Mudge J, Vasdewani J, Schiex T, et al. 2006. Legume genome evolution viewed through the Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicus genomes. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 14959-14964.
26. Chang WC, Eulenstein O. 2006. Reconciling gene trees with apparent polytomies. In Chen DZ, Lee DT (eds.), COCOON, Vol. 4112 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 235-244.
27. Chen K, Durand D, Farach-Colton M. 2000. NOTUNG: a program for dating gene duplications and optimizing gene family trees. J Comput Biol 7: 429-447.
28. Davies TJ, Barraclough TG, Chase MW, Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Savolainen V. 2004. Darwin's abominable mystery: insights from a supertree of the angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 1904-1909.
29. Durand D, Halldórsson BV, Vernot B. 2006. A hybrid micro-macroevolutionary approach to gene tree reconstruction. J Comput Biol 13: 320-335.
30. Eulenstein O. 1998. Vorhersage von Genduplikationen und deren Entwicklung in der Evolution. Ph.D. dissertation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn.
31. Eulenstein O, Vingron M. 1998. On the equivalence of two tree mapping measures. Discrete Appl Math Comb Oper Res Comput Sci 88: 103-128.
32. Fellows MR, Hallett MT, Stege U. 1998. On the multiple gene duplication problem. In Chwa KY, Ibarra OH (eds.), ISAAC Vol. 1533 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 347-356.
33. Fellows MR, Hallett MT, Stege U. 2003. Analogs and duals of the MAST problem for sequences and trees. J Algorithms 49: 192-216.
34. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip043/2003008942.html.
35. Fitch WM, Markowitz E. 1970. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem Genet 4: 579-593.
36. Garey MR, Johnson DS. 1979. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NPCompleteness. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
37. Goodman M, Czelusniak J, Moore GW, Romero-Herrera AE, Matsuda G. 1979. Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst Zool 28: 132-163.
38. Gordon AD. 1986. Consensus supertrees: the synthesis of rooted trees containing overlapping sets of labelled leaves. J Classification 3: 335-348.
39. Górecki P. 2006. Detection of horizontal gene transfer. Ph.D. dissertation, Warsaw University.
40. Górecki P, Tiuryn J. 2004. On the structure of reconciliations. In Lagergren J (ed.), Comparative Genomics, Vol. 3388 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 42-54.
41. Górecki P, Tiuryn J. 2007a. Inferring phylogeny from whole genomes. Bioinformatics 23: e116-e122. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl296.
42. Górecki P, Tiuryn J. 2007b. Urec: a system for unrooted reconciliation. Bioinformatics 23: 511-512.
43. Grant V. 1981. Plant Speciation. New York: Columbia University Press.
44. Guigó R, Muchnik IB, Smith TF. 1996. Reconstruction of ancient molecular phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol 6: 189-213.
45. Guyot R, Keller B. 2004. Ancestral genome duplication in rice. Genome 47: 610-614.
46. Hahn MW, De Bie T, Stajich JE, Nguyen C, Cristianini N. 2005. Estimating the tempo and mode of gene family evolution from comparative genomic data. Genome Res 15: 1153-1160.
47. Hallett MT, Lagergren J. 2001. Efficient algorithms for lateral gene transfer problems. In RECOMB, Vol. of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 149-156.
48. Hallett MT, Lagergren J, Tofigh A. 2004. Simultaneous identification of duplications and lateral transfers. In Bourne PE, Gusfield D. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Conference on Computational Molecular Biology, San Diego, CA, Mar. 27-31, 2004, pp. 347-356.
49. Harding EF. 1971. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv Appl Prob 3: 44-77.
50. Hughes T, Liberles DA. 2007. The pattern of evolution of smaller-scale gene duplicates in mammalian genomes is more consistent with neo- than subfunctionalisation. J Mol Evol 65: 574-588.
51. Hughes T, Liberles D. 2008. A characterisation of the effects of speciation and whole genome duplication on the distribution of gene family sizes and its application to detecting large scale duplication. J Mol Evol 67: 343-357.
52. Luo CW, Chen MC, Chen YC, Yang RW, Liu HF, Chao KM. 2009. Linear-time algorithms for the multiple gene duplication problems. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 15: 1545-5963.
53. Lynch M, Conery JS. 2003. The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes. J Struct Funct Genom 3: 35-44.
54. Ma B, Li M, Zhang L. 2000. From gene trees to species trees. SIAM J Comput 30: 729-752.
55. Maddison WP. 1989. Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. Cladistics Int J Willi Hennig Soc 5: 365-377.
56. Mirkin B, Muchnik IB, Smith TF. 1995. A biologically consistent model for comparing molecular phylogenies. J Comput Biol 2: 493-507.
57. Novozhilov AS, Karev GP, Koonin EV. 2006. Biological applications of the theory of birthand-death processes. Brief Bioinf 7: 70-85.
58. Page RDM. 1994. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. Syst Biol 43: 58-77.
59. Page RDM. 1998. GeneTree: comparing gene and species phylogenies using reconciled trees. Bioinformatics 14: 819-820.
60. Page RDM, Cotton JA. 2002. Vertebrate phylogenomics: reconciled trees and gene duplications. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp. 536-547.
61. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Chapman BA. 2004. Ancient polyploidization predating divergence of the cereals, and its consequences for comparative genomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 9903-9908.
62. Rensing SA, Ick J, Fawcett JA, Lang D, Zimmer A, Van de Peer Y, Reski R. 2007. An ancient genome duplication contributed to the abundance of metabolic genes in the moss physcomitrella patens. BMC Evol Biol 7130.
63. Robinson DF. 1971 Comparison of labeled trees with valency three. J Comb Theory 11: 105-119.
64. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N. 2006. Assessing site-interdependent phylogenetic models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 23: 1762-1775.
65. Rong J, Abbey C, Bowers JE, Brubaker CL, Chang C, Chee PW, Delmonte TA, Ding X, Garza JJ, Marler BS, et al. 2004. A 3347-locus genetic recombination map of sequence-tagged sites reveals features of genome organization, transmission and evolution of cotton (gossypium). Genetics 166: 389-417.
66. Sanderson MJ, Purvis A, Henze C. 1998. Phylogenetic supertrees: assembling the trees of life. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 105-109.
67. Schlueter JA, Dixon P, Granger C, Grant D, Clark L, Doyle JJ, Shoemaker RC. 2004. Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome 47: 868-876.
68. Schranz ME, Mitchell-Olds T. 2006. Independent ancient polyploidy events in the sister families Brassicaceae and Cleomaceae. Plant Cell 18: 1152-1165.
69. Simillion C, Vandepoele K, Van Montagu MCE, Zabeau M, Van de Peer Y. 2002. The hidden duplication past of Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13627-13632.
70. Slowinski JB. 2001. Molecular polytomies. Mol Phylogenet Evol 19: 114-120.
71. Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
72. Sterck L, Rombauts S, Jansson S, Sterky F, Rouze P, Van de Peer Y. 2005. EST data suggest that poplar is an ancient polyploid. New Phytol 167: 165-170.
73. Stern A, and Pupko T. 2006. An evolutionary space-time model with varying among-site dependencies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 392-400.
74. Vandepoele K, Simillion C, Van de Peer Y. 2003. Evidence that rice and other cereals are ancient aneuploids. Plant Cell 15: 2192-2202.
75. Vernot B, Stolzer M, Goldman A, Durand D. 2008. Reconciliation with non-binary species trees. J Comput Biol 15: 981-1006.
76. Vision TJ, Brown DG, Tanksley SD. 2000. The origins of genomic duplications in arabidopsis. Science 290: 2114-2117.
77. Wang X, Shi X, Hao B, Ge S, Luo J. 2005. Duplication and DNA segmental loss in the rice genome: implications for diploidization. New Phytol 165: 937-946.
78. Wehe A, Bansal MS, Burleigh JG, Eulenstein O. 2008. DupTree: a program for large-scale phylogenetic analyses using gene tree parsimony. Bioinformatics 24: 1540-154.
79. Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Grishin NV, Koonin EV. 2002. Genome trees and the tree of life. Trends Genetics 18: 472-479.
80. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from dna sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39: 306-314.
81. Yu J, Wang J, Lin W, Li S, Li H, Zhou J, Ni P, Dong W, Hu S, Zeng C, et al. 2005. The genomes of Oryza sativa: a history of duplications. PLoS Biol 3 e38.
82. Zhang L. 1997. On a Mirkin-Muchnik-Smith conjecture for comparing molecular phylogenies. J Comput Biol 4: 177-187.
83. Zhang L. 2000. Inferring a species tree from gene trees under the deep coalescence cost. RECOMB 2000 poster.
84. Zmasek CM, Eddy SR. 2001. A simple algorithm to infer gene duplication and speciation events on a gene tree. Bioinformatics 17: 821-828.