Differences between students with high and low reading literacy skills: A study with think aloud methodology;Diferencias entre estudiantes con alta y baja competencia lectora: un estudio con metodología de pensar en voz alta

Cultura y Educacion

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 295-308

  Ramos, Luis ^a   Vidal Abarca, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Individual differences; Judgments of learning; Reading literacy; Think aloud methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885359058     PISSN: 11356405     EISSN: 15784118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1174/113564013807749722     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. CATALDO, M. G. & OAKHILL, J. (2000). Why Are Poor Comprehenders Inefficient Searchers? An investigation into the effects of text representation and spatial memory on the ability to locate information in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92 (4), 791-799.
2. CERDÁN, R. & VIDAL-ABARCA, E. (2008). The Effects of Tasks on Integrating Information From Multiple Documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (1), 209-222.
3. COTÉ, N., GOLDMAN, S. & SAUL, E. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25 (1), 1-53.
4. DUNLOSKY, J., RAWSON, K. & MIDDLETON, E. (2005). What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 551-565.
5. GRAESSER, A. C., SINGER, M. & TRABASSO, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
6. KINTSCH, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95 (2), 163-182.
7. LONG, D. L., OPPY, B. J. & SEELY, M. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1456-1470.
8. MAGLIANO, J. P. & MILLIS, K. (2003). Assessing Reading Skill With a Think-Aloud Procedure and Latent Semantic Analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 21 (3), 251-283.
9. MAGLIANO, J. P., TRABASSO, T. & GRAESSER, A. C. (1999). Strategic processing during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91 (4), 615-629.
10. MAKI, R. H., SHIELDS, M., WHEELER, A. E. & ZACHILLI, T. L. (2005). Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (4), 723-731.
11. MAKI, R. H. (1998). Test Predictions over Text Material. En D. J. Hacker, A. C. Graesser & J. Dunlosky (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice (pp. 117-144 ). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. MAÑA, A., VIDAL-ABARCA, E., DOMINGUEZ, C., GIL, L. & CERDÁN, R. (2009). Papel de los procesos metacognitivos en una tarea de pregunta-respuesta con textos escritos (The role of metacognitive processes on a question-answering task with written texts). Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32, 553-565.
13. MCCRUDDEN, M. T. & SCHRAW, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text pro-cessing. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 113-139.
14. OECD (2002). Programme for Internacional Student Assessment: Sample tasks from the PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. París: OECD.
15. OECD (2010). Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). Retrieved from www.oecd.org/els/employment/piaac
16. OZURU, Y., BEST, R., BELL, C., WITHERSPOON, A. & MCNAMARA, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 399-438.
17. ROUET, J-F. (2006). The skills of document use. From text comprehension to web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. SNOW, C. & RAND READING STUDY GROUP (2002). Reading for understanding. RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/
19. TRABASSO, T. & MAGLIANO, J. P. (1996). Conscious understanding during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 255-287.
20. VAN DEN BROEK, P., YOUNG, M., TZENG, Y. & LINDERHOLM, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the on-line construction of a memory representation. En H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 71-98). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. VIDAL-ABARCA, E., MAÑÁ, A. & GIL, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 817-826.
22. VIDAL-ABARCA, E., GILABERT, R. MARTÍNEZ, T., SELLÉS, P., ABAD. N. & FERRER, C. (2008). TPC. Test de Procesos de Comprensión. Madrid: ICCE.
23. VIDAL-ABARCA, E., MARTÍNEZ, T., SALMERÓN, L., CERDÁN, R., GILABERT, R., GIL, L., MAÑÁ, A., LLORÉNS, A. & FERRIS, R. (2011). Recording on-line processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 179-192.
24. WHITNEY, P. & BUDD, D. (1996). Think-Aloud Protocols and the Study of Comprehension. Discourse Processes, 21, 341-351.
25. WHITNEY, P., BUDD, D., BRAMUCCI, R. S. & CRANE, R. S. (1995). On babies, bathwater, and schemata: A reconsideration of top-down processes in comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20, 135-166.
26. YUILL, N. M., OAKHILL, J. V. & PARKIN, A. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability, and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 351-361.