Conscious understanding during comprehension

Discourse Processes

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 255-287

  Trabasso, Tom ^a   Magliano, Joseph P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000408378     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638539609544959     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Albrecht, J.E., & O'Brien, E.J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1061-1070.
2. Anderson, J.R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I. (1994). Glossing and transcription conventions (Appendix 2). In R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (Eds.). Relating events in narrative across linguistic study (pp. 655-664). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, R., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanation: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145-182.
6. Collingwood, R.G. (1938). On the so-called idea of causation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 38, 85-108.
7. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Larkin, K.M. (1980). Inference in text understanding. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.F. Brewer (Eds.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 385-407). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Corbett, A.T., & Dosher, B.A. (1978). Instrument inferences in sentence encoding. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 479-491.
9. Dopkins, S., Klin, C., & Myers, J.L. (1993). The accessibility of information about goals during the processing of narrative texts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 70-80.
10. Einhorn, H.J., & Hogarth, R.M. (1986). Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 3-19.
11. Ericsson, K.A. (1988). Concurrent verbal reports on text comprehension: A review. Text, 8, 295-235.
12. Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1994). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
13. Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1993). The role of predictive inferences in situation model construction. Discourse Processes, 16, 99-124.
14. Fletcher, C.R. (1986). Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 43-58.
15. Fletcher, C.R., & Bloom, C.P. (1988). Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 235-244.
16. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Glanzer, M., Fischer, B., & Dorfman, D. (1984). Short-term storage in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 467-486.
18. Goldman, S.R., & Varma, S. (1995). CAPing the construction-integration model of discourse comprehension. In C.A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C.R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 337-358). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Graesser, A.C. (1981). Prose comprehension beyond the word. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Graesser, A.C., Bertus, E.L., & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text. In E.J. O'Brien & R.F. Lorch (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 295-319). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Graesser, A.C., & Clark, L.F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Graesser, A.C., Haberlandt, K., & Koizumi, D. (1987). How is reading time influenced by knowledge based inferences and world knowledge? In B.K. Britton & S.M. Glynn (Eds.), Executive control processes in reading (pp. 217-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Graesser, A.C., Person, N., & Huber, J. (1992). Mechanisms that generate questions. Questions and information systems (pp. 167-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing Inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371-395.
25. Graesser, A.C., & Zwaan, R.A. (1995). Inference generation and the construction of situation models. In C.A. Weaver, S. Mannes, & C.R. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 117-139). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Hart, H.L.A., & Honore, A.M. (1959). Causation in the law. Law Quarterly Review, 72, 58-90.
27. Hilton, D.J., & Slugowski, B.R. (1986). Knowledge-based causal attribution: The abnormal conditions focus model. Psychological Review, 93, 75-88.
28. Just, M.A., & Carpenter, P.A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
29. Keefe, D.E., & McDaniel, M.A. (1993). The time course and durability of predictive inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 446-463.
30. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
31. Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
32. Lehnert, W.G. (1978). The process of question answering. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Long, D.L., & Golding, J.M. (1993). Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 16, 55-73.
34. Long, D.L., Golding, J.M., & Graesser, A.C. (1993). A text of on-line status of goal-related inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 634-647.
35. Mackie, J.L. (1980). The cement of the universe. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
36. Magliano, J.P., Baggett, W.B., Johnson, B.K., & Graesser, A.C. (1993). The time course in which causal antecedent and causal consequence inferences are generated. Discourse Processes, 16, 35-53.
37. Magliano, J.P., & Graesser, A.C. (1991). A three-pronged method for studying inference generation in literary text. Poetics 20, 193-232.
38. Magliano, J.P., Trabasso, T., & Langston, M. (1995). Cohesion and coherence in sentence and story understanding. Unpublished manuscript.
39. McKoon, G., & Ratclifif, R. (1986). Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 82-91.
40. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1989). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inference with recognition: Compatibility checking vs. compound cue theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 547-563.
41. McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.
42. Morrow, D.G., Bower, G.H., & Greenspan, S.L. (1990). Situation-based inferences during narrative comprehension. In A.C. Graesser & G.H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension (pp. 123-136). San Diego, CA: Academic.
43. Murray, J.D., Klin, C.M., & Myers, J.L. (1993). Forward inferences in narrative text. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 454-473.
44. Myers, J.L., O'Brien, E.J., Albrecht, J.E., & Mason, R.A. (1994). Maintaining global coherence during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 876-886.
45. Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. O'Brien, E.J., & Albrecht, J.E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 777-784.
47. Olson, G.M., Duffy, S.A., & Mack, R.L. (1980). Applying knowledge of writing conventions to prose comprehension and composition. In W.E. McKeatchie (Ed.), Learning, cognition, and college teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
48. Olson, G.M., Duffy, S.A., & Mack, R.L. (1984). Thinking-out-loud as a method for studying real-time comprehension processes. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in the study of immediate processes in comprehension (pp. 253-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Olson, G.M., Mack, R.L., & Duffy, S.A. (1981). Cognitive aspects of genre. Poetics, 10, 283-315.
50. Potts, G.R., Keenan, J.M., & Golding, J.M. (1988). Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 399-415.
51. Ranney, M., & Thaggard, P. (1988). Explanatory coherence and belief revision in naive physics. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 426-432). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. Rumelhart, D.E. (1991). Understanding understanding. In W. Kessen, A. Ortony, & F. Craik (Eds.), Memories, thoughts, and emotions: Essays in honor of George Mandler (pp.257-275). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Schank, R.C. (1986). Explanation patterns: Understanding mechanically and creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Singer, M., Graesser, A.C., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 421-441.
56. Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (in press). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology.
57. Singer, M., Halldorson, M., Lear, J.C., & Andrusiak, P. (1992). Validation of causal bridging inferences in discourse understanding. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 543-572.
58. Stein, N.L., & Levine, L. (1989). The causal organization of emotional knowledge: A developmental study. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 343-378.
59. Stein, N.L., & Levine, L. (1990). Making sense out of emotional experience: The representation and use of goal-directed knowledge. In N.L. Stein, B. Leventhal, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 45-73). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Stein, N.L., & Trabasso, T. (1985). The search after meaning: Comprehension and comprehension monitoring. In F.J. Morrison, C. Lord, & D. Keating (Eds.), Applied developmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 33-58). San Diego, CA: Academic.
61. Suh, S. (1989). Converging evidence for causal inferences during comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Chicago.
62. Suh, S., & Trabasso, T. (1993). Inferences during reading: Converging evidence from discourse analysis, talk-aloud protocols, and recognition priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 279-301.
63. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Understanding emotional understanding. In N. Frijda (Ed.), The Proceedings of the International Society of research on emotions (pp. 78-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Trabasso, T., & Magliano, P.A. (1996). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them? In M. Graves, P. van den Broek & B. Taylor (Eds.), The first R: A right of all children (pp. 158-181). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University Press.
65. Trabasso, T., & Nickels, M. (1992). The development of goal plans of action in the narration of a picture story. Discourse Processes, 15, 249-275.
66. Trabasso, T., & Ozyurek, A. (in press). Communicating evaluation in narrative understanding. In T. Givon (Ed.), Spontaneous conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
67. Trabasso, T., & Suh, S. (1993). Understanding text: Achieving explanatory coherence through on-line inferences and mental operations in working memory. Discourse Processes, 16, 3-34.
68. Trabasso, T., Suh, S., & Payton, P. (1994). Explanatory coherence in communication about narrative understanding of events. In M. A. Gernsbacher & T. Givon (Eds.), Text coherence as a mental entity (pp. 189-214). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
69. Trabasso, T., Suh, S., Payton, P., & Jain, R. (1995). Explanatory inference and other strategies during comprehension and their effect on recall. In R. Lorch & E. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in test comprehension (pp. 219-239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Trabasso, T., van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in the representation of stories. Discourse Processes, 12, 1-25.
71. van den Broek, P. (1990). Causal inferences and the comprehension of narrative texts. In A.C. Graesser & G.H. Bower (Eds.), Inferences and text comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic.
72. van den Broek, P., Fletcher, C.R., & Risden, K. (1993). Investigations of inferential processes in reading: A theoretical and methodological integration. Discourse Processes, 16, 169-180.
73. van den Broek, P., & Lorch, R.F. (1993). Network representations of causal relations in memory for narrative texts: Evidence from primed recognition. Discourse Processes, 16, 75-98.
74. van den Broek, R., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartman, E. (1995). The role of readers' standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R.F. Lorch & E.J. O'Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353-374). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. San Diego, CA: Academic.
76. Whitney, P., Ritchie, B.G., & Crane, R.S., (1992). The effect of foregrounding on readers' use of predictive inferences. Memory & Cognition, 20, 424-432.