Driving behaviour models enabling the simulation of Advanced Driving Assistance Systems: Revisiting the Action Point paradigm

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 36, Issue , 2013, Pages 352-366

  Bifulco, Gennaro Nicola ^a   Pariota, Luigi ^a   Brackstione, Mark ^b,c   Mcdonald, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c IOMI Consulting   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Action Point theory; ADAS; Car following; Driving behaviour; Instrumented Vehicle; ITS; Microscopic

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONTROL SYSTEM SYNTHESIS; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; VEHICLES;

ACTION POINT THEORY; ADAS; CAR FOLLOWING; DRIVING BEHAVIOUR; INSTRUMENTED VEHICLE; MICROSCOPIC;

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS;

CAR USE; MODELING; REAL TIME; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SAFETY; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM;

ITALY;

EID: 84885231220     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abe G., Richardson J. Alarm timing, trust and driver expectation for forward collision warning systems. Applied Ergonomics 2006, 37:577-586.
2. Barbosa, L., 1961. Studies on traffic flow models. In: Reports No. 202A-1, The Ohio State University Antenna Laboratory.
3. Bevrani K., Chung E. An examination of the microscopic simulation models to identify traffic safety indicators. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research 2012, 10(2):66-81.
4. Bifulco, G.N., Simonelli, F., Di Pace, R., 2008. Experiments toward a human-like adaptive cruise control. In: 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 919-924.
5. Bifulco G.N., Pariota L., Simonelli F., Di Pace R. Real-time smoothing of car-following data through sensor-fusion techniques. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2011, 20:524-535.
6. Bifulco G.N., Pariota L., Simonelli F., Di Pace R. Development and testing of a fully adaptive cruise control system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2013, 29:156-170. 10.1016/j.trc.2011.07.001.
7. Brackstone M., McDonald M. Car-following: a historical review. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 1999, 2:181-196.
8. Brackstone M., Sultan B., McDonald M. Motorway driver behaviour: studies on car following. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2002, 5:31-46.
9. Brackstone M., Waterson B., McDonald M. Determinants of following headway in congested traffic. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 2009, 12:131-142.
10. Chandler R.E., Herman R., Montroll E. Traffic dynamics: studies in car following. Operations Research 1958, 6:165-184.
11. Colombaroni, C., Fusco, G., 2013. Artificial Neural Network models for car following: experimental analysis and calibration issues, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, . http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2013.801717.
12. Evans L., Rothery R. Perceptual thresholds in car following - a recent comparison. Transportation Science 1977, 11(1):60-72.
13. Forbes T.W. Human factor consideration in traffic flow theory. Highway Research Record 1963, 15:60-66.
14. Gazis D.C., Herman R., Potts R.B. Car-following theory of steady-state traffic flow. Operations Research 1959, 7:499-505.
15. Gipps P.G. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1981, 15:105-111.
16. Goodrich, M.A., Boer, E.R., Inoue, H., 1999. A model of human brake initiation behavior with implications for ACC design. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC99), 5-8 October, Tokyo.
17. Gray R., Regan D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information. Vision Research 1998, 38:499-512.
18. Gurusinghe G.S., Nakatsuji T., Yoichi A., Prakash R. Multiple car-following data with real-time kinematic Global Positioning System. Transportation Research Record 2002, 1802:166-180.
19. Hamdar, S.H., Mahmassani, H.S., 2008. Driver car-following behavior: from discrete event process to continuous set of episodes. In: Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, preprint CD-ROM.
20. Herman R., Montroll E.W., Potts R.B., Rothery R.W. Traffic dynamics: analysis of stability in car following. Operations Research 1959, 7:86-106.
21. Hoedemaeker M., Brookhuis K.A. Behavioural adaptation to driving with an adaptive cruise control (ACC). Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 1998, 1:95-106.
22. Hoogendoorn S., Hoogendoorn R.G., Daamen W. Wiedemann revisited: new trajectory filtering technique and its implications for car-following modeling. Transportation Research Record 2011, 2260:152-162.
23. Kometani E., Sasaki T. On the stability of traffic flow. Journal of Operations Research Japan 1958, 2:11-26.
24. Kometani E., Sasaki T. Dynamic behaviour of traffic with a nonlinear spacing-speed relationship. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Laboratories, General Motors 1959, 105-119.
25. Leutzbach W., Wiedemann R. Development and applications of traffic simulation models at the Karlsruhe Institut fur Verkehrwesen. Traffic Engineering and Control 1986, 27:270-278.
26. Ma X., Andreasson I. Behavior measurement, analysis, and regime classification in car following. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2007, 8(1):144-156.
27. McCall J.C., Achler O., Trivedi M.M. Design of an instrumented vehicle test bed for developing a human centered driver support system. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2004, 2004:483-488.
28. Michaels R.M. Perceptual factors in car following. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Theory of Road Traffic Flow 1963, 44-59. OECD, Paris.
29. Minderhoud M.M., Bovy P.H.L. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2001, 33:89-97.
30. Montroll E.W. Acceleration and clustering tendency of vehicular traffic. Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Traffic Flow, Research Laboratories, General Motors 1959, 147-157. Elsevier, New York.
31. Newell, G.F., 1965. Instability in dense highway traffic, a review. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on The Theory of Road Traffic Flow, London, pp. 73-83.
32. Ozaki, H., 1993. Reaction and anticipation in the car following behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Traffic and Transportation Theory, pp. 349-366.
33. Pariota, L., 2013. Driving behavior for ADAS: theoretical and experimental analyses. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Naples. http://www.fedoatd.unina.it/126/.
34. Reiter U. Empirical studies as a basis for traffic flow models. In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Highway Capacity 1994, 2:493-502.
35. Seppelt B.D., Lee J.D. Making adaptive cruise control ACC limits visible. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 2007, 65(3):192-205.
36. Simonelli F., Bifulco G.N., De Martinis V., Punzo V. Human-like adaptive cruise control systems through a learning machine approach. application of soft computing. Advances in Soft Computing 2009, 52:240-249. 10.1007/978-3-540-88079-0_2.
37. Stanton N.A., Young M.S. Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 2005, 48(10):1294-1313.
38. Sultan B., Brackstone M., McDonald M. Evidence for the use of deceleration/acceleration in car following. Transportation Research Record 2004, 1883:31-39.
39. Thiemann C., Treiber M., Kesting A. Estimating acceleration and lane-changing dynamics from next generation simulation trajectory data. Transportation Research Record 2008, 2088:90-101.
40. Todosoiev, E.P., 1963. The action point model of the driver vehicle system. In: Report No. 202A-3, The Ohio State University, Engineering Experiment Station, Columbus, Ohio.
41. Treiterer, J., Myers, J.A., 1974. The hysteresis phenomenon in traffic flow. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Sydney, Australia, pp. 13-38.
42. US Department of Transportation FHWA, 2009. Next generation simulation, NGSIM. http://www.ngsim.fhwa.dot.gov/.
43. Van der Heijden, R.E.C.M., Marchau, V.A.M.J., 2005. Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and driving behavior: setting the agenda. In: Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004 IEEE International Conference, vol. 4, ISSN 1062-922X, ISBN 0 7803 8566 7, pp. 4003-4010.
44. Viti, F., Hoogendoorn, S.P., Alkim, T.P., Bootsma, G., 2008. Driving behavior adaptation under ACC: results from a large Field operational test in the Netherlands. In: Proc. of the Intelligent Vehicle Symposium, Eindhoven, June 2008, The Netherlands, pp 745-750.
45. Wang W., Zhang W., Guo H., Bubb H., Ikeuchi K. A safety-based approaching behavioural model with various driving characteristics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 2011, 19(6):1202-1214.
46. Warren W.H. Self-motion: visual perception and visual control. Perception of Space and Motion 1995, 263-312. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. W. Epstein, S. Rogers (Eds.).
47. Wiedemann, R., 1974. Simulation des Strassenverkehrsflusses. Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Verkehrswesen der Universität Karlsruhe, Band 8, Karlsruhe, Germany.
48. Wiedemann, R., Reiter, U., 1992. Microscopic traffic simulation: the simulation system MISSION, background and actual state. In: CEC Project ICARUS (V1052), Final Report, vol. 2, Appendix A, CEC, Brussels.
49. Wu, Y., Boyle, L.N., 2013. Adaptive cruise control: driver characteristics that influence frequency of use. In: Proc. of the 92nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Paper 13-5109, CD-ROM, TRB, January 2013, Washington, DC.
50. Wu J., Brackstone M., McDonald M. The validation of a microscopic simulation model: a methodological case study. Transportation Research Part C 2003, 11(6):463-479.
51. Yeo, H., 2008. Asymmetric Microscopic Driving Behavior Theory. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California.
52. Zhang H.M. A mathematical theory of traffic hysteresis. Transportation Research Part B 1999, 33:1-23.