Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 4 to 8 years of children born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestational age: A meta-analysis

JAMA Pediatrics

Volumn 167, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 967-974

  Moore, Gregory P ^a,b,c   Lemyre, Brigitte ^a,b,c   Barrowman, Nick ^a   Daboval, Thierry ^a,b,c  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONSENSUS; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMBASE; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; NEURODEVELOPMENTAL IMPAIRMENT; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; SURVIVOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT;

CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, EXTREMELY PREMATURE; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE;

EID: 84885201559     PISSN: 21686203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.2395     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Batton DG; Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Clinical report - antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):422-427.
2. Berger TM, Bernet V, El Alama S, et al. Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland: 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly. October 2011;14:w13280. doi:10.4414/smw.2011.13280.
3. Jeffries AL, Kirpalani HM; Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Committee. Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Paediatr Child Health (Oxford). 2012;17(8):143. www.pulsus.com/journals/toc.jsp? sCurrPg=journal&jnlKy=5&isuKy=1083& fromfold=Past+Issues&fold= Table%20Of %20Contents. Accessed November 15, 2012.
4. Kent AL, Casey A, Lui K; NSW and ACT Perinatal Care at the Borderlines of Viability Consensus Workshop Committee. Collaborative decision-making for extreme premature delivery. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43(6):489-491.
5. Vavasseur C, Foran A, Murphy JF. Consensus statements on the borderlands of neonatal viability: from uncertainty to grey areas. Ir Med J. 2007;100(8):561-564.
6. Andrews B, Lagatta J, Chu A, et al. The nonimpact of gestational age on neurodevelopmental outcome for ventilated survivors born at 23-28 weeks of gestation. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(6):574-578.
7. Moro TT, Kavanaugh K, Savage TA, Reyes MR, Kimura RE, Bhat R. Parent decision making for life support for extremely premature infants: from the prenatal through end-of-life period. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2011;25(1):52-60.
8. Guillén U, Suh S, Munson D, et al. Development and pretesting of a decision-aid to use when counseling parents facing imminent extreme premature delivery. J Pediatr. 2012;160(3):382-387.
9. Yee WH, Sauve R. What information do parents want from the antenatal consultation? Paediatr Child Health. 2007;12(3):191-196.
10. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making - pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(9):780-781.
11. Taking shared decision making more seriously. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):784. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60290-0.
12. Janvier A, Lorenz JM, Lantos JD. Antenatal counselling for parents facing an extremely preterm birth: limitations of the medical evidence. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(8):800-804.
13. Guillen U, DeMauro S,Ma L, et al. Survival rates in extremely low birthweight infants depend on the denominator: avoiding potential for bias by specifying denominators. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(4):329.e1-329.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.032.
14. Watts JL, Saigal S. Outcome of extreme prematurity: as information increases so do the dilemmas. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91(3):F221-F225. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.071928.
15. Bode MM, D'Eugenio DB, Forsyth N, Coleman J, Gross CR, Gross SJ. Outcome of extreme prematurity: a prospective comparison of 2 regional cohorts born 20 years apart. Pediatrics. 2009;124(3):866-874.
16. Callanan C, Doyle L, Rickards A, Kelly E, Ford G, Davis N. Children followed with difficulty: how do they differ? J Paediatr Child Health. 2001;37(2):152-156.
17. Hallman M, Vainionpää L. Infants born very premature - more prospective studies needed. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89(10):1149-1151.
18. TinW,Wariyar U, Hey E; Northern Neonatal Network. Changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation in the north of England between 1983 and 1994. BMJ. 1997;314(7074): 107-111.
19. Tyson JE, Saigal S. Outcomes for extremely low-birth-weight infants: disappointing news. JAMA. 2005;294(3):371-373.
20. Mercurio MR. The ethics of newborn resuscitation. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(6): 354-363.
21. Hack M, Taylor HG, Drotar D, et al. Poor predictive validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics. 2005;116(2):333-341.
22. Roberts G, Anderson PJ, Doyle LW; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. The stability of the diagnosis of developmental disability between ages 2 and 8 in a geographic cohort of very preterm children born in 1997. Arch Dis Child. 2010;95(10):786-790.
23. Schmidt B, Anderson PJ, Doyle LW, et al Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity (CAP) Trial Investigators. Survival without disability to age 5 years after neonatal caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. JAMA. 2012;307(3):275-282.
24. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group.Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008-2012.
25. McGowan J, Sampson M, Lefebvre C. Evidence based checklist for the peer review of electronic search strategies (PRESS EBC). Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2010;5(1):149-154. http://ejournals.library .ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/ article/view/7402/6436. Accessed July 16, 2013.
26. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR,Wright LL, Wrage LA, Poole WK. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):1253- 1261.
27. Lefebvre AC, Manheimer E, Glanville J, Information C. Searching for studies. In: Higgens J, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011.
28. Thompson LC, Gillberg C. Behavioural problems from perinatal and neonatal insults. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):392-393.
29. Kaufman A, Kaufman N. Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1983.
30. Wechsler D.Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - Revised. Swedish ed. Stockholm, Sweden: Psykologforlaget; 1989.
31. Wechsler D.Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - Revised. Finnish ed. Helsinki, Finland: Psykologienkustannus; 1995.
32. Wechsler D.Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children; Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 2003.
33. Wechsler D.Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence - Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1989.
34. Terman LM, Merrill MA. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Manual for the Third Revision Form L-M1972 Norm. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1973.
35. Melchers P, Preuss U. Adaptation of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children for German-speaking areas, part 1: introduction of the battery [in German]. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr. 1992;20(2):85-93.
36. Palisano R, Rosenbaum P,Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39(4):214-223.
37. Marlow N,Wolke D, BracewellMA, SamaraM; EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(1):9-19.
38. Roberts G, Anderson PJ, De Luca C, Doyle LW; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Changes in neurodevelopmental outcome at age eight in geographic cohorts of children born at 22-27 weeks' gestational age during the 1990s. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(2):F90-F94.
39. Mikkola K, Ritari N, Tommiska V, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 5 years of age of a national cohort of extremely low birth weight infants who were born in 1996-1997. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):1391-1400.
40. Drotar D, Hack M, Taylor G, Schluchter M, Andreias L, Klein N. The impact of extremely low birth weight on the families of school-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2006-2013.
41. Stephens BE, Bann CM, Poole WK, Vohr BR. Neurodevelopmental impairment: predictors of its impact on the families of extremely low birth weight infants at 18 months. Infant Ment Health J. 2008;29(6):570-587.
42. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-188.
43. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in ameta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539-1558.
44. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat Theory Applications. 1979;6(2):65-70.
45. Wacholder S. Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;123(1):174-184.
46. Deddens JA, Petersen MR. Approaches for estimating prevalence ratios. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(7):481; 501-506.
47. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2012.
48. Schwarzer G. meta:meta-analysis with R: Updated: 11-29-2012. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=meta. Accessed July 16, 2013.
49. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339(7716):b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535.
50. Larroque B, Ancel PY, Marret S, et al; EPIPAGE Study group. Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study. Lancet. 2008;371(9615):813-820.
51. Leversen KT, Sommerfelt K, Rønnestad A, et al. Prediction of neurodevelopmental and sensory outcome at 5 years in Norwegian children born extremely preterm. Pediatrics. 2011;127(3):e630-e638. doi:10.1542/peds.2010- 1001.
52. Stahlmann N, Rapp M, Herting E, Thyen U. Outcome of extremely premature infants at early school age: health-related quality of life and neurosensory, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes in a population-based sample in northern Germany. Neuropediatrics. 2009;40(3):112-119.
53. Steinmacher J, Pohlandt F, Bode H, Sander S, Kron M, Franz AR. Neurodevelopmental follow-up of very preterm infants after proactive treatment at a gestational age of ≥23 weeks. J Pediatr. 2008;152(6):771-776; e1-e2. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.11.004.
54. Woodward LJ, Moor S, Hood KM, et al. Very preterm children show impairments across multiple neurodevelopmental domains by age 4 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2009;94(5):F339-F344. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.146282.
55. Zlatohlávková B, Kytnarová J, Kuběna A, Fleischnerová A, Dokoupilová M, Plavka R. Five-year survival without major disability of extremely preterm infants born at 22-27 weeks' gestation admitted to a NICU. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(11):1618-1623.
56. Baron IS, Rey-Casserly C. Extremely preterm birth outcome: a review of four decades of cognitive research. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010;20(4):430-452.
57. Lorenz JM. Survival and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of the extremely preterm infant: a systematic review. Saudi Med J. 2011;32(9):885-894.
58. Bhutta AT, ClevesMA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2002;288(6):728-737.
59. Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, Newton CR. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):445-452.
60. Ganz ML, Tendulkar SA. Mental health care services for children with special health care needs and their family members: prevalence and correlates of unmet needs. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2138-2148.
61. Castro L, Yolton K, Haberman B, et al. Bias in reported neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight survivors. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):404-410.
62. Wariyar UK, Richmond S. Morbidity and preterm delivery: importance of 100% follow-up. Lancet. 1989;1(8634):387-388.
63. Wolke D, Söhne B, Ohrt B, Riegel K. Follow-up of preterm children: important to document dropouts. Lancet. 1995;345(8947):447.
64. Tager-Flusberg H, Plesa-Skwerer D. Assessment of intelligence. In: Carey WB, Crocker AC, Elias ER, Feldman HM, Coleman WL, eds. Developmental-Behavioural Pediatrics. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2009:811-827.
65. MeadowW, Lagatta J, Andrews B, Lantos J. The mathematics of morality for neonatal resuscitation. Clin Perinatol. 2012;39(4):941-956.
66. Wilkinson DJ. Gestational ageism. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(6):567-572.
67. Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Intensive care for extreme prematurity - moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(16):1672-1681.
68. Larroque B, Ancel PY, Marchand-Martin L, et al Epipage Study Group. Special care and school difficulties in 8-year-old very preterm children: the Epipage cohort study. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21361. doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0021361.
69. Leversen KT, Sommerfelt K, Rønnestad A, et al. Predicting neurosensory disabilities at two years of age in a national cohort of extremely premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(9):581-586.
70. Grégoire G, Derderian F, Le Lorier J. Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(1):159-163.
71. Anderson PJ, De Luca CR, Hutchinson E, Roberts G, Doyle LW; Victorian Infant Collaborative Group. Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(4):352-356.
72. Wolke D, Ratschinski G, Ohrt B, Riegel K. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infantsmay be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. Eur J Pediatr. 1994;153(12):906-915.
73. Bodeau-Livinec F, Marlow N, Ancel PY, Kurinczuk JJ, Costeloe K, Kaminski M. Impact of intensive care practices on short-term and long-term outcomes for extremely preterm infants: comparison between the British Isles and France. Pediatrics. 2008;122(5):e1014-e1021. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2976.
74. Saigal S, Stoskopf BL, Feeny D, et al. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. JAMA. 1999;281(21):1991-1997.
75. Saigal S, Stoskopf B, Pinelli J, et al. Self-perceived health-related quality of life of former extremely low birth weight infants at young adulthood. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):1140-1148.
76. Pignotti MS, Donzelli G. Perinatal care at the threshold of viability: an international comparison of practical guidelines for the treatment of extremely preterm births. Pediatrics. 2008;121(1):e193-e198. doi:10.1542/peds .2007-0513.