Assessment of short dental implants restored with single-unit nonsplinted restorations

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 499-502

  Le, Bach T ^a   Follmar, Troy ^a   Borzabadi Farahani, Ali ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

implant failures; implant survival; short implants

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; COMPLICATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL SURGERY; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; SMOKING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS, SINGLE-TOOTH; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; SMOKING;

EID: 84885189377     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afaf2     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, et al. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: A 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:691-700.
2. Bormann KH, Suarez-Cunqueiro MM, von See C, et al. Forty sandwich osteotomies in atrophic mandibles: A retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69:1562-1570.
3. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P, et al. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: A 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:82-95.
4. Ferrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Inferior alveolar nerve transposition in conjunction with implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:610-620.
5. Robiony M, Zorzan E, Polini F, et al. Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma: Combined use in restoration of severe atrophic mandible. Long-term results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19: 1202-1210.
6. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 suppl):203-215.
7. Fugazzotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: Rationale and treatment results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:487-496.
8. Neldam C, Pinholt E. State of the art of short dental implants: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14:622-632.
9. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, et al. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: A 3-to 14-year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:586-592.
10. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: Dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010:CD005968.
11. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, et al. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implantsdA Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2:167-184.
12. Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Börjesson G. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:179-183.
13. Winkler S, Morris HF, Oshi S. Implant survival to 36 months related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol. 2000;5:22-31.
14. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of dental implants in the posterior maxillae: Report on 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:151-161.
15. Glantz PO, Nilner K. Biomechanical aspects of prosthetic implant-borne reconstructions. Periodontol 2000. 1998; 17:119-124.
16. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17 (suppl 2):35-51.
17. Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: A retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92:139-144.
18. Anitua E, Orive G. Short implants in maxilla and mandibles: A retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J Periodontol. 2010;81:819-826.
19. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (,10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:667-676.
20. Monje A, Fu JH, Chan HL, et al. Do implant length and width matter for short dental implants (6-9 mm)? A metaanalysis of prospective studies. J Periodontol. [epub ahead of print] March 1, 2013. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.120745.
21. Karabuda ZC, Abdel-Haq J, Arisan V. Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: A prospective 15-month evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:840-849.
22. Sul YT, Jönsson J, Yoon GS, et al. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1146-1155.
23. Rossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, et al. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6-mm-long implants with a moderately rough surface: A prospective 2-year follow-up cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:937-943.
24. Lai HC, Si MS, Zhuang LF, et al. Long-term outcomes of short dental implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: A clinical retrospective study of 5-10 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24:230-237.
25. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, et al. Short implantsdAn analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:86-93.
26. Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: Providing a rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:257-266.
27. Cochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Higginbottom FL, et al. Evaluation of an endosseous titanium implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface in the canine mandible: Radiographic results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:240-252.
28. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, et al. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;40:1-11.
29. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;12: 144-153.
30. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, et al. Early loading of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants: A prospective splitmouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:572-578.
31. Rocuzzo M, Wlison T. A prospective study evaluating a protocol for 6 weeks' loading of SLA implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13:502-507.
32. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(suppl 4):172-184.
33. Pierrisnard L, Renauord F, Renault P, et al. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003;5:254-262.
34. Meijer H, Kuiper J, Starmans F, et al. Stress distribution around dental implants: Influence of superstructure, length of implant, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:96-102.
35. Hedia HS. Stress and strain distribution behavior in the bone due to the effect of cancellous bone, dental implant material, and bone height. Biomed Mater Eng. 2002;12:111-119.
36. Chang SH, Lin CL, Hsue SS, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34:153-160.
37. Ding X, Liao SH, Zhu XH, et al. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11:279-287.
38. Borzabadi-Farahani A. Orthodontic considerations in restorative management of hypodontia patients with endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol. 2012;38:779-791.
39. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affectin. The bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater. 1992;10:153-201.
40. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross M, et al. Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by splinted and unsplinted implant-supported fixed cemented restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:658-662.
41. Yang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T. Biomechanical rationale for short implants in splinted restorations: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24:130-132.
42. Albrektsson T, Gottlow J, Meirelles L, et al. Survival of NobelDirect implants: An analysis of 550 consecutively placed implants at 18 different clinical centers. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007;9:65-70.