Biomechanical rationale for short implants in splinted restorations: An in vitro study

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 130-132

  Yang, Tsung Chieh ^a   Maeda, Yoshinobu ^a   Gonda, Tomoya ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; SPLINT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIOMECHANICS; BITE FORCE; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; SPLINTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 79957854861     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Renouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17(suppl 2): 35-51.
2. ten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, Krekeler G, Sutter F. Short (6-mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: Results of a multicenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 791-798.
3. El-Homsi F, Lockowandt P, Linden LA. Simulating periodontal effects in dental osseointergrated implants: Effect on intramobile damping element on the fatigue strength of dental implants-An in vitro test method. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 449-455.
4. Haraldson T, Ingervall B. Muscle function during chewing and swallowing in patients with osseointergrated oral implant bridges. An electromyographic study. Acta Odontol Scand 1979; 37: 207-216.
5. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 254-262.