Computed tomography vs. digital radiography assessment for detection of osteolysis in asymptomatic patients with uncemented cups. A proposal for a new classification system based on computer tomography

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1608-1613

  Sandgren, Buster ^a   Crafoord, Joakim ^b   Garellick, Göran ^c   Carlsson, Lars ^d   Weidenhielm, Lars ^a   Olivecrona, Henrik ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c SAHLGRENSKA ACADEMY AT UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d Orthocenter   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computed Tomography (CT); CT based classification system; Digital Radiographs (DR); Metal cups; Peri Acetabular Osteolysis (PAO)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE ATROPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERI ACETABULAR OSTEOLYSIS; RELIABILITY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT); CT BASED CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHS (DR); METAL CUPS; PERI-ACETABULAR OSTEOLYSIS (PAO);

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OSTEOLYSIS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885021530     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.029     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Claus A.M., Walde T.A., Leung S.B., et al. Management of patients with acetabular socket wear and pelvic osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(3 Suppl 1):112.
2. Naudie D.D., Engh C.A. Surgical management of polyethylene wear and pelvic osteolysis with modular uncemented acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(4 Suppl 1):124.
3. Chiang P.P., Burke D.W., Freiberg A.A., et al. Osteolysis of the pelvis: evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, (417):164.
4. Brubaker S.M., Brown T.E., Manaswi A., et al. Treatment options and allograft use in revision total hip arthroplasty the acetabulum. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 Suppl 3):52.
5. Garbuz D., Morsi E., Mohamed N., et al. Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, (324):98.
6. Saleh K.J., Holtzman J., Gafni A., et al. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83-A(7):1040.
7. Kafer W., Fraitzl C.R., Kinkel S., et al. Analysis of validity and reliability of three radiographic classification systems for preoperative assessment of bone stock loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004, 142(1):33.
8. Engh C.A., Sychterz C.J., Young A.M., et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in radiographic assessment of osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17(6):752.
9. Claus A.M., Totterman S.M., Sychterz C.J., et al. Computed tomography to assess pelvic lysis after total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (422):167.
10. Johanson N.A., Driftmier K.R., Cerynik D.L., et al. Grading acetabular defects: the need for a universal and valid system. J Arthroplasty 2010, 25(3):425.
11. Kitamura N., Naudie D.D., Leung S.B., et al. Diagnostic features of pelvic osteolysis on computed tomography: the importance of communication pathways. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(7):1542.
12. Kitamura N., Pappedemos P.C., Duffy P.R., et al. The value of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs for evaluating pelvic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:239.
13. Leung S., Naudie D., Kitamura N., et al. Computed tomography in the assessment of periacetabular osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(3):592.
14. Looney R.J., Boyd A., Totterman S., et al. Volumetric computerized tomography as a measurement of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis and its correlation with wear. Arthritis Res 2002, 4(1):59.
15. Puri L., Lapinski B., Wixson R.L., et al. Computed tomographic follow-up evaluation of operative intervention for periacetabular lysis. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2):78.
16. Puri L., Wixson R.L., Stern S.H., et al. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(4):609.
17. Walde T.A., Mohan V., Leung S., et al. Sensitivity and specificity of plain radiographs for detection of medial-wall perforation secondary to osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(1):20.
18. Rubash H.E., Sinha R.K., Paprosky W., et al. A new classification system for the management of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 1999, 48:37.
19. Walde T.A., Weiland D.E., Leung S.B., et al. Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, (437):138.
20. Weiland D.E., Walde T.A., Leung S.B., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of periprosthetic acetabular osteolysis: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 2005, 23(4):713.
21. Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., Lawrence J.M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9(1):33.
22. Gozzard C., Blom A., Taylor A., et al. A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(5):638.
23. Malchau H., Potter H.G. How are wear-related problems diagnosed and what forms of surveillance are necessary?. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008, 16(Suppl. 1):S14.
24. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, (121):20.
25. Amstutz H.C., Smith R.K. Total hip replacement following failed femoral hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979, 61(8):1161.
26. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968, 70(4):213.
27. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33(1):159.
28. Egawa H., Powers C.C., Beykirch S.E., et al. Can the volume of pelvic osteolysis be calculated without using computed tomography?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467(1):181.
29. Egawa H., Ho H., Hopper R.H., et al. Computed tomography assessment of pelvic osteolysis and cup-lesion interface involvement with a press-fit porous-coated acetabular cup. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(2):233.