Grading acetabular defects. The need for a universal and valid system

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 425-431

  Johanson, Norman A ^a   Driftmier, Kim R ^b   Cerynik, Douglas L ^a   Stehman, Charles C ^c  

^a HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NAVAL MEDICAL CENTER PORTSMOUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bony defect; Classification; Reliability; Revision hip arthroplasty; Validity

Indexed keywords

ACETABULAR DEFECT; ARTHRODESIS; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; HIP DISEASE; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; OSTEOLYSIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RATING SCALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDITY;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE RESORPTION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77950521577     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Gustilo R.B., Pasternak H.S. Revision hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 111.
2. D'Antonio J.A., Capello W.N., Borden L.S., et al. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 126.
3. Engh C.A., Glassman A.H. Cementless revision of failed total hip replacement: an update. Instr Course Lect. 1991, 40:189.
4. D'Antonio J.A. Periprosthetic bone loss of the acetabulum. Classification and management. Orthop Clin North Am 1992, 23:279.
5. Gross A.E., Allan D.G., Catre M., et al. Bone grafts in hip replacement surgery. The pelvic side. Orthop Clin North Am 1993, 24:679.
6. Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., Lawrence J.M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9:33.
7. Zehntner M.K., Ganz R. Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty. 1994, 9:469.
8. Moskal J.T., Danisa O.A., Shaffrey C.I. Isolated revision acetabuloplasty using a porous-coated cementless acetabular component without removal of a well-fixed femoral component. A 3- to 9-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1997, 12:719.
9. Garcia-Cimbrelo E. Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1999, 14:397.
10. Saleh K.J., Jaroszynski G., Woodgate I., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2000, 15:951.
11. Saleh K.J., Holtzman J., Gafni A., et al. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2001, 19:50.
12. Campbell D.G., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., et al. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001, 16:83.
13. Winter E., Piert M., Volkmann R., et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83-A:862.
14. Eggli S., Muller C., Ganz R. Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 136.
15. Paprosky W.G., Burnett R.S. Assessment and classification of bone stock deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2002, 31:459.
16. Ng T.P., Chiu K.Y. Acetabular revision without cement. J Arthroplasty. 2003, 18:435.
17. Gozzard C., Blom A., Taylor A., et al. A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2003, 18:638.
18. Davis A.M., Schemitsh E.H., Gollish J.D., et al. Classifying failed hip arthroplasty: generalizability of reliability and validity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003, 171.
19. Gerber A., Pisan M., Zurakowski D., et al. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A:2358.
20. O'Rourke M.R., Paprosky W.G., Rosenberg A.G. Use of structural allografts in acetabular revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 113.
21. Moskal J.T., Shen F.H. The use of bilobed porous-coated acetabular components without structural bone graft for type III acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2004, 19:867.
22. Nehme A., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 201.
23. Holt G.E., Dennis D.A. Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 209.
24. Sporer S.M., O'Rourke M., Chong P., et al. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:760.
25. Sporer S.M., O'Rouke M., Paprosky W.G. The treatment of pelvic discontinuity during acetabular revision. J Arthroplasty. 2005, 20(4 Suppl. 2):79.
26. Hansen E., Ries M.D. Revision total hip arthroplasty for large medial (protrusio) defects with a rim-fit cementless acetabular component. J Arthroplasty. 2006, 21:72.
27. Sporer S.M., O'Rourke M., Chong P., et al. The use of structural distal femoral allografts for acetabular reconstruction. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88(Suppl 1 Pt 1):92.
28. Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty. 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2):83.
29. Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty. 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2):87.
30. Bostrom M.P., Lehman A.P., Buly R.L., et al. Acetabular revision with the contour antiprotrusio cage: 2 to 5 year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, [Electronic publication ahead of print].
31. van Haaren E.H., Heyligers I.C., Alexander F.G.M., et al. High rate of impaction grafting in large acetabular defects. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007, 89:296.