Analysis of validity and reliability of three radiographic classification systems for preoperative assessment of bone stock loss in revision total hip arthroplasty

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 142, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-39

  Kafer W ^a   Fraitzl, C R ^a   Kinkel, S ^a   Puhl, W ^a   Kessler, S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^b Stadtisches Krankenhaus Sindelfingen   (Germany)

Author keywords

Radiographic classification; Reliability; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Validity; X ray morphology

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; ASEPTIC NECROSIS; ASSOCIATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMUR; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL EXPERT; OSTEOLYSIS; PALPATION; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RELIABILITY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; VARIANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; ADULT; AGED; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HIP PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICS;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOLYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS;

EID: 1542373527     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-818027     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Norman-Taylor FH, Palmer CR, Villar RN. Quality-of-life improvement compared after hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1996; 78-B: 74-77
2. Puhl W, Kessler S. Which factors influence the long term outcome of total hip replacement? In: Rieker C, Oberholzer S, Urs W (eds.). World Tribology Forum in Arthroplasty. Bern Göttingen Toronto: Hans Huber, 2001: 35-47
3. Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish national total hip arthoplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 354-359
4. Barrack RL, Sawhney J, Hsu J, Cofield RH. Cost analysis of revision total hip arthroplasty. A 5-year followup study. Clin Orthop 1999; 369: 175-178
5. Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop 1988; 235: 111-119
6. Kessler S, Kinkel S, Käfer W, Puhl W. Revisionshü ftendoprothetik: Wie beeinflussen der metaphysäre Prothesenaufsitz, der diaphysäre Formschluss und der 3-Punkte-Schaftkontakt das postoperative Sinterungsverhalten eines zementfreien Revisionsgeradschaftes? Z Orthop 2002; 140: 595-602
7. Böhm P, Bischel O. Das zementfreie diaphysäre Verankerungsprinzip für den Hüftschaftwechsel bei großen Knochendefekten - Analyse von 12 Jahren Erfahrung mit dem Wagner- Revisionsschaft. Z Orthop 2001; 139: 229-239
8. Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: Classification and preoperative planning. J Bone Joint Surg 1999; 81-A: 1483-1498
9. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Davis A, Resig S, Gross AE. Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83-A: 1040-1046
10. Bettin D, Katthagen BD. Die DGOT-Klassifikation von Knochendefekten bei Hüft-Totalendoprothesen-Revisionsoperationen. Z Orthop 1997; 135: 281-284
11. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, Bargar WL, Bierbaum BF, Boettcher WG, Steinberg ME, Stulberg SD, Wedge JH. Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1989; 243: 126-137
12. Elke R. Die Schaftrevision. Klassifikation und Behandlung. Orthopäde 2001; 30: 280-286
13. Elke R, Wagner A, Berli B, Morscher E. Die Pfannenrevision. Klassifikationen und Behandlungsmöglichkeiten. Orthopäde 2001; 30: 266-272
14. Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW. The PCA primary and revision hip systems. In: Fitzgerald RH (ed.). Non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. New York: Raven Press, 1988
15. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1993; 295: 172-178
16. Paprosky WG, Magnus RE. Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop 1994; 298: 147-155
17. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, Saleh L, Jaroszynski G, Wong P, Woodgate I, Davis A, Gross AE. Development, test reliability and validation of a classification for revision hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 50-56
18. Jerosch J, Steinbeck J, Fuchs S, Kirchhoff C. Radiologische Beurteilbarkeit von Pfannendefekten bei Pfannenlockerungen von Hüftalloarthroplastiken. Unfallchirurg 1996; 99: 727-733
19. Müller ME. Das Prinzip der Klassifikation. In: Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H (eds.). Manual der Osteosynthese. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 1993: 118-150
20. Frandsen PA, Andersen E, Madsen F, Skjodt T. Garden's classification of femoral neck fractures. An assessment of inter-observer variation. J Bone Joint Surg 1988; 70-B: 588-590
21. Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, Koval K, Cuomo F, Schoenberg N. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75-A: 1745-1750
22. Stöve J, Riederle F, Kessler S, Puhl W, Günther KP. Reproduzierbarkeit radiologischer Klassifikationskriterien der Femurkopfnekrose. Z Orthop 2001; 139: 163-167
23. Hüsler J, Zimmermann H. Statistische Prinzipien für medizinische Projekte. Bern: Hans Huber, 1996
24. Nielsen JO, Dons-Jensen H, Sorensen HT. Lauge-Hansen classification of malleolar fractures. An assessment of the reproducibility in 118 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1990; 61: 385-387
25. Lienert GA. Testaufbau und Testanalyse. Weinheim: Beltz, 1969
26. Kessler S, Kinkel S, Käfer W, Puhl W, Schochat T. Influence of operation duration on perioperative morbidity in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg; 2003; 69: 328-333
27. Kinkel S, Käfer W, Reissig J, Puhl W, Kessler S. Revision total hip arthroplasty: The influence of gender and age on the perioperative complication rate. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2003: im Druck
28. Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 83-86
29. Brand RA, Yoder SA, Pedersen DR. Interobserver variability in interpreting radiographic lucencies about total hip reconstructions. Clin Orthop 1985; 192: 237-239
30. Käfer W, Kinkel S, Puhl W, Kessler S. Revisionshü ftendoprothetik: Untersuchung des prädiktiven Werts einer radiologischen Defektklassifikation. Z Orthop, 2003: im Druck