A comparison of the reliability and validity of bone stock loss classification systems used for revision hip surgery

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 638-642

  Gozzard, Charles ^a,c   Blom, Ashley ^a   Taylor, A ^a   Smith, Evert ^b   Learmonth, Ian ^a  

^a BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Classification; Reliability; Revision hip arthroplasty; Validity

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGEONS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ENDO KLINIC CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; EVALUATION; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOLYSIS; PAPROSKY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RELIABILITY; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGEON; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0041419913     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00107-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Reikeras O, Bjerkreim I, Gundersson R: Total hip arthroplasty for arthrodesed hips: 5- to 13-year results. J Arthroplasty 10:529, 1995
2. Kilgus D, Amstutz HC, Wolgin MA, Dorey FJ: Joint replacement for ankylosed hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:45, 1990
3. Johnston RC, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Harris WH, et al: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement: a standard system of terminology for reporting results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:161, 1990
4. D'Antonio J, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al: Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243:126, 1989
5. Garbuz DS, Morsi E, Mohamed N, Gross AE: Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop 323:98, 1996
6. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM: Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 9:33, 1994
7. Rubash HE, Sinha RK, Paprosky WG, et al: A new classification system for the management of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. AAOS Instruct Course Lect 48:37, 1999
8. Engh CA, Glassman AH: Cementless revision of failed total hip replacement: an update. AAOS Instruct Course Lect 40:189, 1991
9. Gross AE, Allan DG, Lavoie GJ, Oakeshott RD: Revision arthroplasty of the proximal femur using allograft bone. Orthop Clin North Am 24:705, 1993
10. Mallory TH: Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision. Clin Orthop 235:47, 1988
11. D'Antonio J, McCarthy JC, Bargar WL, et al: Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 296:133, 1993
12. Paprosky WG, Lawrence JM, Cameron HU: Femoral defect classification: clinical application. Orthop Rev 19:9, 1990
13. tk;4Engelbrecht E, Heinert K: Klassifikation und Behandlungsrichtlinien von Knochensubstanzverlusten bei Revisionsoperationen am Huftgelenkmittelfristige Ergebnisse. Primare und Revisionsalloarthro-plastik Hrsg - Endo-Klinik. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1987
14. Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159, 1977
15. Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz D, Duncan CP: Femoral bone loss in total hip arthroplasty: classification and preoperative planning. Instr Course Lect 49:83, 2000
16. Campbell DG, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP: Reliability of acetabular bone defect classification systems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:83, 2001
17. Svanholm H, Starklint H, Gundersen HJ: Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnosis with special reference to the kappa statistic. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 97:689, 1989
18. Saleh KJ, Holtzman J, Gafni A, et al: Reliability and intraoperative validity of preoperative assessment of standardized plain radiographs in predicting bone loss at revision hip surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1040, 2001