Clients' Perspectives on a Technology-Based Food Assistance Application System

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 656-673

  Heflin, Colleen M ^a   London, Andrew S ^b   Mueser, Peter R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

e government; food stamps; internet; SNAP

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884962238     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074012455454     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Becker S. A.E-government visual accessibility for older adult users.Social Science Computer Review. 2004;22:11-23.
2. Berg B. L.Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. 2007). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (6th ed). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Boston, MA: Pearson Education; 2007:.
3. Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. (2011). SNAP On-line: A review of state government SNAP websites.Retrieved from http://www.cbpp.org/files/8-23-05fa.pdf.
4. Cody S.,Renee N.,Emily S. M.Modernization of the food stamp program in Florida. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Food and Nutrition Service; 2008:.
5. Creswell J. W.Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007:.
6. Cunnyngham K. E.,Castner L. A.Reaching those in need: State supplemental nutrition assistance program participation rates in 2008. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Services; 2010:.
7. Current Population Survey. (2009). Table 3.reported Internet use for individuals 3 years and older, by State: 2009. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/hhes/computer/publications/2009.html.
8. Dabholkar P.,Bobbitt L.,Lee E.Understanding consumer motivation and behavior related to self-scanning in retailing: Implications for strategy and research on technology-based self-service.International Journal of Service Industry Management. 2003;14 (1): 59-95.
9. Daponte B.,Sanders S.,Taylor L.Why Do Low-Income Households Not Use Food Stamps: Evidence from an Experiment.Journal of Human Resources. 1999;34 (3): 612-628.
10. Durkin M.,McCartan-Quinn D.,O'Donnell A.,Howcroft B.Retail bank customer preferences: Personal and remote interactions.International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2003;31:177-189.
11. Edin K.,Lein L.Making ends meet. New York, NY: Russell Sage; 1997:.
12. Food stamp program: Use of alternative methods to apply for and maintain benefits could be enhanced by additional evaluation and information promising practices. Report to the Chairman, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate: U. S. Government Accountability Office; 2007:.
13. Heflin C. M.,London A. S.,Scott E. K.Mitigating material hardship: The strategies low-income families employ to reduce the consequences of poverty.Sociological Inquiry. 2011;81:223-246.
14. Lange Jennifer.ACESS: Florida's Modernization Initiative. Presentation to the Child Welfare Leadership Program; 2007; 2007.
15. Lenhart A.,Horrigan J. B.,Rainie L.,Allen K.,Boyce A.,Madden M.,O'Grady E.The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2003:.
16. McNeal R.,Tolbert C.,Mossberger K.,Dotterweich L.Innovating in digital government in the American states.Social Science Quarterly. 2003;84 (1): 52-70.
17. Nord M.,Coleman-Jensen A.,Andrews M.,Carlson S.Household food security in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2011:.
18. Nord M.,Prell M.Food security of SNAP recipients improved following the 2009 stimulus package.Amber Waves. 2011;9 (2): 16-23.
19. Reddick C.Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?.Government Information Quarterly. 2005;22 (1): 38-57.
20. Ridzi F.Selling welfare reform: Work-first and the new common sense of employment. New York: New York University Press; 2009:.
21. Ridzi F.,London A. S."It's great when people don't even have their welfare cases opened": TANF diversion as process and lesson.Review of Policy Research. 2006;23:725-743.
22. Rowe G.,Hall S.,O'Brien C.,Pindus N.,Koralek R.Enhancing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Certification: SNAP Modernization Efforts: Interim Report-Volume 1. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service; 2010:.
23. Rubaii-Barrett N.,Wise L. R.Disability access and e-government: An empirical analysis of state practices.Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 2008;19 (1): 52-64.
24. Rubin H. J.,Rubin I. S.Qualitative interviewing. The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005:.
25. Schram S. F.,Soss J.,Fording R. C.,Houser L.Deciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform.American Sociological Review. 2009;74:398-422.
26. Soss Joseph,Bruch Sarah K.,Ferree Myra Marx.From Policy to Polity: Democracy, Paternalism and the Incorporation of Disadvantaged Citizens.American Sociological Review. 2010;75 (2): 205-226.
27. Streib G.,Navarro I.Citizen demand for interactive e-government: The case of Georgia consumer services.American Review of Public Administration. 2006;36:288-300.
28. Thomas J.,Streib G.The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2003;13 (1): 83-102.
29. U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2011) Supplemental nutrition assistance program monthly data, December 1, 2011. [Data prior to July 2006 provide on request.] Retrieved from http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/34SNAPmonthly.htm.
30. Welch E.,Hinnant C.,Moon M.Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2005;15 (3): 371-391.
31. West D.E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes.Public Administration Review. 2004;64 (1): 15-27.
32. Wolkwitz Kari,Carole TrippeCharacteristics of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Households: Fiscal Year 2008. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Office of Research and Analysis; 2009:.