Development of medium- and low-rise reinforced concrete building fragility curves based on Chi-Chi Earthquake data

Natural Hazards

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 695-728

  Hsieh, Meng Hsun ^a   Lee, Bing Jean ^a   Lei, Tsu Chiang ^a   Lin, Jer Yan ^a  

^a FENG CHIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Chi Chi Earthquake; Empirical procedure; Fragility curve; Grid based method; Maximum likelihood estimate; Medium and low rise RC buildings

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODE; CHI-CHI EARTHQUAKE 1999; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ESTIMATION METHOD; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

TAIWAN;

EID: 84884909473     PISSN: 0921030X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-013-0733-8     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. ATC-13 (1985) Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, Applied Technology Council, FEMA contract no. EMW-C-0912, Redwood City, CA.
2. Barbat AH, Pujades LG, Lantada N (2008) Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum method: application to Barcelona. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(10-11): 851-865.
3. Basöz NI, Kiremidjian AS, King SA, Law KH (1999) Statistical analysis of bridge damage data from the 1994 Northridge, CA, Earthquake. Earthq Spectra 15(1): 25-54.
4. Bernstein S, Bernstein R (1999) Schaum's outline of theory and problems of elements of statistics II: inferential statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 451.
5. Borzi B, Pinho R, Crowley H (2008) Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large-scale assessment of RC buildings. Eng Struct 30: 804-820.
6. Carr JR (1983) Application of the theory of regionalized variables to earthquake parametric estimation and simulation. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Mining and Geological Engineering, University of Arizona, USA.
7. Carr JR, Glass CE (1984) A regionalized variables model for seismic hazard assessment. In: Proceedings of the 8th world conference on earthquake engineering, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 207-213.
8. Casciati F, Faravelli L, Liu XD (1994) Lessons of rehabilitation design learned from statistical analyses of masonry seismic-vulnerability data. Struct Saf 16(1-2): 73-89.
9. Cole SW, Xu Y, Burton PW (2008) Seismic hazard and risk in Shanghai and estimation of expected building damage. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(10-11): 778-794.
10. Colombi M, Borzi B, Crowley H, Onida M, Meroni F, Pinho R (2008) Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data. Bull Earthq Eng 6: 485-504.
11. Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data, Revised Edn. John Wiley & Sons, New York 928 pp.
12. Grant DN, Bommer JJ, Pinho R, Calvi GM, Goretti A, Meroni F (2007) A prioritization scheme for seismic intervention in school buildings in Italy. Earthq Spectra 23(2): 291-314.
13. Hsiao CP, Lee BJ, Chou TY (2001) Statistics and analyses of the characteristics of damaged building structures for Chi-Chi Earthquake (in Chinese). Report for the architecture & building research institute, Ministry of the Interior, Taiwan, p 224.
14. Jeong SH, Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS (2012) Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of code-compliant multi-story RC buildings. Eng Struct 34: 527-537.
15. Journel AG (1983) Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions. Math Geol 15(3): 445-468.
16. Journel AG, Rossi M (1989) When do we need a trend model in Kriging. Math Geol 21(7): 715-739.
17. Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Panagiotopoulos C, Penelis G (2006) A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4(4): 391-413.
18. Kim SH, Shinozuka M (2004) Development of fragility curves for bridges retrofitted by column jacketing. Probab Eng Mech 19: 105-112.
19. Lagaros ND (2008) Probabilistic fragility analysis: a tool for assessing design rules of RC buildings. Earthq Eng Vib 7(1): 45-46.
20. Lee CL, Su RKL (2012) Fragility analysis of low-rise masonry in-filled reinforced concrete buildings by a coefficient-based spectral acceleration method. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 41: 697-713.
21. Lee BJ, Chou TY, Lei TC (2003) Development of hazard damaged buildings model by Chi-Chi earthquake data. In: Proceedings of the joint NCREE/JRC international collaboration on earthquake disaster mitigation research, Taipei, Taiwan, NCREE-03-029, paper No. 013.
22. Lee BJ, Chou TY, Lei TC, Wu CT, Lin JY, Huang PH (2005) Study on the seismic building damage assessment modeling on the Chi Chi Earthquake damage data: II. Fragility curves and seismic building risk analysis (in Chinese). J Chin Inst Civ Hydraul Eng 17(2): 293-300.
23. Matheron G (1971) Theory of regionalized variables and its applications. Ecole National Superieure des Mines, Paris.
24. McBratney AB, Webster R, Burgess TM (1981) The design of optimal sampling schemes for local estimation and mapping of regionalized variables: I. Theory and method. Comput Geosci 7(4): 331-334.
25. Mitropoulou CC, Papadrakakis M (2011) Developing fragility curves based on neural network IDA predictions. Eng Struct 33: 3409-3421.
26. Miyakoshi J, Hayashi Y, Tamura K, Fukuwa N (1997) Damage ratio functions of buildings using damage data of the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on structural safety and reliability (ICOSSAR), pp 349-354.
27. Muñoz A, Blondet M, Aguilar R, Astorga MA (2007) Empirical fragility curves for peruvian school buildings. Earthq Resis Eng Struct VI 93: 269-277.
28. Murao O, Yamazaki F (1999) Development of fragility curves for buildings based on damage data due to the Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake. Asian-Pacific symposium on structural reliability and its applications, pp 259-269.
29. Onose JI (1982) Prediction of damage ratio of reinforced concrete buildings due to earthquakes and comparison with actual damage ratio. In: Proceedings of the 6th Japan earthquake engineering symposium: Japan society of civil engineers, Tokyo, Japan, pp 2081-2088.
30. Ouchi T, Lin A, Chen A, Maruyama T (2001) The 1999 Chi-Chi (Taiwan) earthquake: earthquake fault and strong motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5): 966-976.
31. Park J, Towashiraporn P, Craig JI, Goodnod BJ (2009) Seismic fragility analysis of low-rise unreinforced masonry structures. Eng Struct 31: 125-137.
32. Penelis GG, Kappos AJ, Stylianidis KC (2003) Assessment of the seismic vulnerability of unreinforced masonry buildings. Paper presented at 8th international conference on structural studies: repairs and maintenance of heritage architecture, Chalkidiki, Greece. WIT Press, Southampton, UK.
33. Porter K, Kennedy R, Bachman R (2007) Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 23(2): 471-489.
34. Reese S, Bradley BA, Bind J, Smart G, Power W, Sturman J (2011) Empirical building fragilities from observed damage in the 2009 South Pacific Tsunami. Earth Sci Rev 107(1-2): 156-173.
35. Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25(10): 1241-1263.
36. Rota M, Penna A, Strobbia CL (2008) Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28: 933-947.
37. Rota M, Penna A, Magenesa G (2010) A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 32(5): 1312-1323.
38. Shibata A (2006) Estimation of earthquake damage to urban systems. Struct Control Health Monit 13: 454-471.
39. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Lee J, Naganuma T (2000a) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. J Eng Mech 126(12): 1224-1231.
40. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim HK, Kim SH (2000b) Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. J Eng Mech 126(12): 1287-1295.
41. Shinozuka M, Feng MQ, Kim H, Uzawa T, Ueda T (2003) Statistical analysis of fragility curves. Technical Report MCEER-03-0002, multidisciplinary center for earthquake engineering research, The State University of New York at Buffalo.
42. Spence RJS, Coburn AW, Pomonis A (1992) Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of the 10th world conference of earthquake engineering, AA Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 551-556.
43. Straub D, Kiureghian AD (2008) Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data. Struct Saf 30: 320-336.
44. Tien YM, Juang CH, Chen JM, Pai CH (2012) Isointensity-isoexposure concept for seismic vulnerability analysis-a case study of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Eng Geol 131-132: 1-10.
45. Tsai YB, Lee CP (2005) Strong motion instrumentation programs in Taiwan past and present. Earth Environ Sci 58(3): 255-278.
46. Whitman RV, Anagnos T, Kircher CA, Lagorio HJ, Lawson RS, Schneider P (1997) Development of a national earthquake loss estimation methodology. Earthq Spectra 13(4): 643-661.
47. Wu YM, Shin TC, Chang CH (2001) Near real-time mapping of peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity following a strong earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 91(5): 1218-1385.
48. Wu YM, Hsiao NC, Teng TL (2004) Relationships between strong ground motion peak values and seismic loss during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake. Nat Hazards 32: 357-373.
49. Yamaguchi N, Yamazaki F (2000) Fragility curves for building in Japan based on damage surveys after the 1995 KOBE earthquake. The 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, paper No. 2451.
50. Yamaguchi N, Yamazaki F (2001) Estimation of strong motion distribution in the 1995 Kobe earthquake based on building damage data. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 30(6): 787-801.
51. Yamazaki F (2001) Seismic monitoring and early damage assessment systems in Japan. Prog Struct Eng Mat 3: 66-75.
52. Yamazaki F, Onishi J, Tayama S (1999) Earthquake damage assessment of expressway structure in Japan. Asian-Pacific symposium on structural reliability and its applications, Taipei, Taiwan, pp 205-214.
53. Yi JH, Kim SH, Kushiyama S (2007) PDF interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges. Eng Struct 29: 1312-1322.