Probabilistic seismic performance assessment of code-compliant multi-story RC buildings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 34, Issue , 2012, Pages 527-537

  Jeong, Seong Hoon ^a   Mwafy, Aman M ^b   Elnashai, Amr S ^c  

^a Inha University   (South Korea)

^b UNITED ARAB EMIRATES UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^c University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

Damage state probability; Earthquake response; Performance assessment; RC buildings; Seismic design code; Seismic fragility curves

Indexed keywords

DAMAGE STATE; EARTHQUAKE RESPONSE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RC BUILDINGS; SEISMIC DESIGN CODE; SEISMIC FRAGILITY;

BUILDING CODES; CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; DIFFERENTIAL AMPLIFIERS; DUCTILITY; GEOLOGIC MODELS; PROBABILITY; RATING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

BUILDING CODE; DUCTILE DEFORMATION; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; GROUND MOTION; MULTISTOREY BUILDING; PEAK ACCELERATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

IDAS;

EID: 81055138991     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Elnashai A.S., Hampton S., Lee J.S., McLaren T., Myers J.D., Navarro C., et al. Architectural overview of MAEviz-HAZTURK. J Earthquake Eng 2008, 12:92-99.
2. Kircher C.A., Whitman R.V., Holmes W.T. HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods. Nat Hazards Rev 2006, 7(2):45-59.
3. Rossetto T., Elnashai A. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 2003, 25:1241-1263.
4. Ellingwood B., Celik O., Kinali K. Fragility assessment of building structural systems in Mid-America. Earthquake Eng Struc 2007, 36:1935-1952.
5. Kwon O.S., Elnashai A. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability of RC structure. Eng Struct 2006, 28(2):289-303.
6. Kircil M.S., Polat Z. Fragility analysis of mid-rise R/C frame buildings. Eng Struct 2006, 28(9):1335-1345.
7. Cornell C, Jalayer F, Hamburger R, Foutch D. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng - ASCE 2002;128(4):526-33.
8. Calvi G.M., Pinho R., Magenes G., Bommer J.J., Restrepo-Velez L.F., Crowley H. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET J Earthquake Technol 2006, 43(3):75-104.
9. EN1998 Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance - part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings 2004, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
10. Miranda E. Site-dependent strength-reduction factors. J Struct Eng - ASCE 1993;119(12):3503-19.
11. Borzi B., Elnashai A. Refined force reduction factors for seismic design. Eng Struct 2000, 22(10):1244-1260.
12. Mwafy A., Elnashai A. Overstrength and force reduction factors of multistorey reinforced-concrete buildings. Struct Design Tall Build 2002, 11:329-351.
13. Fardis M. Background information regarding modeling and the analysis. Prenormative Research in Support of Eurocode 8 Report; 1994.
14. Elnashai A, Papanikolaou V, Lee D, ZEUS NL - a system for inelastic analysis of structures, user's manual. Mid-America Earthquake (MAE) Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeering. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL; 2010.
15. Elnashai A., Izzuddin B. Modeling of material non-linearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading" Earthquake Eng Struc 1993, 22:509-532.
16. Jeong S.H., Elnashai A. Analytical assessment of an irregular RC frame for full-scale 3D pseudo-dynamic testing - Part I: analytical model verification. J Earthquake Eng 2005, 9(1):95-128.
17. Martinez-Rueda J., Elnashai A. Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Mater Struct 1997, 30(197):139-147.
18. Ambraseys N, Douglas J, Rinaldis D, Berge-Thierry C, Suhadolc P, Costa G, et al. Dissemination of european strong-motion data, Vol. 2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Swindon, U.K.; 2004.
19. Rota M., Penna A., Magenes G. A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Eng Struct 2010, 32(5):1312-1323.
20. Padgett J.E., DesRoches R. Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges. Earthquake Eng Struc 2008, 37(8):1157-1174.
21. Shome N., Cornell C., Bazzurro P., Carballo J. Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra (EERI) 1998, 14(3):469-500.
22. Celik O., Ellingwood B. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames - role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Struct Saf 2010, 32(1):1-12.
23. Jeong S.H., Elnashai A. Probabilistic fragility analysis parameterized by fundamental response quantities. Eng Struct 2007, 29(6):1238-1251.
24. ASCE. Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 41-06. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA; 2007.
25. SEAOC. Performance based seismic engineering of buildings. Vision 2000 Committee, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, California; 1995.
26. Sozen M. Review of earthquake response of RC buildings with a view to drift control. State-of-the Art in Earthquake Engineering. Ankara, Turkey: Kelaynak Press; 1981.
27. Ghobarah A., Aly N., El-Attar M. Seismic reliability assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings. J Earthquake Eng 1998, 2(4):569-592.
28. Dymiotis C., Kappos A., Chryssanthopoulos M. Seismic reliability of RC frames with uncertain drift and member capacity. J Struct Eng - ASCE 1999, 125(9):1038-1047.
29. Mwafy A. Analytically derived fragility relationships for the modern high-rise buildings in the UAE. Struct Design Tall Spec Build 2010. doi:10.1002/tal.642. doi:10.1002/tal.642.
30. Wen YK, Ellingwood B, Veneziano D, Bracci J. Uncertainty modeling in earthquake engineering (white paper), Project FD-2 Report. Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois; 2003.
31. Wen YK, Ellingwood B, Bracci J. Vulnerability function framework for consequence-based engineering. MAE Report 04-04, Mid-America Earthquake Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2004.
32. Celik O., Ellingwood B. Seismic risk assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames subjected to Mid-America ground motions. J Struct Eng - ASCE 2009, 135(4):414-424.
33. FEMA356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC; 2000.
34. Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS. Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames. J Struct Eng - ASCE 1998;124(8):922-9.
35. Park YJ, Ang AHS, Wen YK. Seismic damage analysis and damage-limiting design of RC buildings. Struct. Res. Ser., Rep. UILU-ENG-84-2007, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois; 1984.
36. Saiidi M, Sozen MA. Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of RC structures. J Struct Eng - ASCE 1981;107(5):937-53.
37. ASCE. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston VA; 2010.