Data quality of the German Screening Colonoscopy Registry

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 813-818

  Adler, Andreas ^a   Lieberman, David ^b   Aminalai, Alireza ^c   Aschenbeck, Jens ^c   Drossel, Rolf ^c   Mayr, Michael ^c   Mroß, Michael ^c   Scheel, Mathias ^c   Schröder, Andreas ^c   Keining, Christoph ^a   Stange, Gabriela ^d   Wiedenmann, Bertram ^a   Gauger, Ulrich ^e   Altenhofen, Lutz ^f   Rösch, Thomas ^d  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Private Practice in Gastroenterology   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^e Private Gastroenterology Office   (Germany)

^f Central Research Institute of Ambulatory Health Care   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CASE REPORT FORM 1; CASE REPORT FORM 2; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COLON ADENOMA; COLON HEMORRHAGE; COLON PERFORATION; COLONOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE PRACTICE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; REGISTER; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SELF REPORT;

ADENOMA; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL AUDIT; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884902052     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344583     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Imperiale T. F., Glowinski E. A., Lin-Cooper C. et al. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med: 2008; 359 1218 1224
2. Winawer S. J., Zauber A. G., Ho M. N. et al. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. New Engl J Med: 1993; 329 1977 1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
3. Li J., Nadel M. R., Poppell C. F. et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopy reporting: results from a statewide cancer screening program. Diagn Ther Endosc: 2010; Epub 2010 Sep 28. DOI: 10.1155/2010/419796
4. Patel S. G., Ahnen D. J. Isn't it time to stop talking about colonoscopy quality and start doing something about it? Dig Dis Sci: 2011; 56 2776 2779
5. Lieberman D. A., Faigel D. O., Logan J. R. et al. Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 645 653
6. Logan J. R., Lieberman D. A. The use of databases and registries to enhance colonoscopy quality. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am: 2010; 20 717 734
7. Armstrong D., Hollingworth R., Macintosh D. et al. Point-of-care, peer-comparator colonoscopy practice audit: The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Quality Program - Endoscopy. Can J Gastroenterol: 2011; 25 13 20
8. http://www.zi-berlin.de/cms/fileadmin/images/content/PDFs-alle/ Darmkrebsfrueherk-Bericht.pdf
9. www.healthgrades.com
10. http://www.tagesspiegel.de/der-klinikfuehrer-berlin-2009/1829928.html
11. http://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/praktische-hilfe/1640568.html
12. Adler A., Wegscheider K., Lieberman D. et al. Factors determining screening colonoscopy quality. A prospective study on adenoma detection rates from 12134 examinations (Berlin Colonoscopy Project 3, BECOP-3). Gut: 2013; 62 236 241
13. Bretagne J. F., Ponchon T. Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy? Endoscopy: 2008; 40 523 528 (Pubitemid 351911845)
14. Williams J. E., Le T. D., Faigel D. O. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 498 506
15. Kaminski M. F., Regula M., Rupinski M. et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med: 2010; 362 1795 1803
16. Baxter N. N., Sutradhar R., Forbes S. S. et al. Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology: 2011; 140 65 72
17. Ko C. W., Dominitz J. A., Green P. et al. Accuracy of Medicare claims for identifying findings and procedures performed during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 447 453
18. Rex D. K., Petrini J. L., Baron T. H. et al. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy: Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 873 885
19. Segnan N., Patnick S., von Karsa L. eds. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union: 2010; DOI: 10.2772/1458 (printed version); DOI: 10.2772/15379 (electronic version)
20. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., Cahen D. L. for the SCoPE Consortium et al. Quality evaluation of colonoscopy reporting and colonoscopy performance in daily clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc: 2012; 75 98 106
21. Bowles C. J., Leicester R., Romaya C. et al. Prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut: 2004; 53 277 283 (Pubitemid 38125519)
22. Kelly N. M., Moorehead J., Tham T. Is the 'driving test' a robust quality indicator of colonoscopy performance? World J Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 2 112 120
23. Shah H. A., Paszat L. F., Saskin R. et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology: 2007; 132 2297 2303 (Pubitemid 46890860)
24. Wilkins T., LeClair B., Smolkin M. et al. Screening colonoscopies by primary care physicians: a meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med: 2009; 7 56 62 Erratum in: Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 181
25. Regula J., Rupinski M., Kraszewska E. et al. Colonoscopy in colorectal-cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med: 2006; 355 1863 1872 (Pubitemid 44664644)
26. Lieberman D. A., Prindiville S., Weiss D. G. et al. Risk factors for advanced colonic neoplasia and hyperplastic polyps in asymptomatic individuals. JAMA: 2003; 290 2959 2967 (Pubitemid 37505528)
27. Barclay R. L., Vicari J. J., Doughty A. S. et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med: 2006; 355 2533 2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)
28. Kanna B., Schori M., Azeez S. et al. Colorectal tumors within an urban minority population in New York City. J Gen Intern Med: 2007; 22 835 840 (Pubitemid 46763965)
29. Bretagne J. F., Hamonic S., Piette C. et al. Variations between endoscopists in rates of detection of colorectal neoplasia and their impact on a regional screening program based on colonoscopy after fecal occult blood testing. Gastrointest Endosc: 2010; 71 335 341
30. Aslinia F., Uradomo L., Steele A. et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 721 731
31. Niv Y., Hazazi R., Levi Z. et al. Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic people: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci: 2008; 53 3049 3054
32. Imperiale T. F., Wagner D. R., Lin C. Y. et al. Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med: 2002; 346 1781 1785 (Pubitemid 34586913)
33. Ibanez M. B., Munoz-Navas M. A., Dugue J. M. et al. Diagnostic value of distal colonic polyps for prediction of advanced proximal neoplasia in an average-risk population undergoing screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med: 2004; 59 634 641 (Pubitemid 38609691)
34. Chiu H. M., Wang H. P., Lee Y. C. et al. A prospective study of the frequency and the topographical distribution of colon neoplasia in asymptomatic average-risk Chinese adults as determined by colonoscopic screening. Gastrointest Endosc: 2005; 61 547 553
35. Schoenfeld P., Cash B., Flood A. et al. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med: 2005; 352 2061 2068 (Pubitemid 40664307)
36. Strul H., Kariv R., Leshno M. et al. The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years. Am J Gastroenterol: 2006; 101 255 262 (Pubitemid 43381664)
37. Rogge J. D., Elmore M. F., Mahoney S. J. et al. Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol: 1994; 89 1775 1780 (Pubitemid 24320539)
38. Lieberman D. A., Weiss D. G., Bond J. H. et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med: 2000; 343 162 168 (Pubitemid 30489212)
39. Imperiale T. F., Wagner D. R., Ching Y. et al. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med: 2000; 343 169 174 (Pubitemid 30489213)
40. Soon M. S., Kozarek R. A., Ayub K. et al. Screening colonoscopy in Chinese and Western patients: a comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2005; 100 2749 2755
41. Zubarik R., Fleischer D. E., Mastropietro C. et al. Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc: 1999; 50 322 328 (Pubitemid 29418815)
42. Bini E. J., Firoozi B., Choung R. J. et al. Systematic evaluation of complications related to endoscopy in a training setting: a prospective 30-day outcomes study. Gastrointest Endosc: 2003; 57 8 16 (Pubitemid 36236792)
43. Korman L. Y., Overholt B. F., Box T. et al. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers. Gastrointest Endosc: 2003; 58 554 557 (Pubitemid 37205769)
44. Levin T. R., Zhao W., Conell C. et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med: 2006; 145 880 886 (Pubitemid 351639963)
45. Lin O. S., Kozarek R. A., Schembre D. B. et al. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy. JAMA: 2006; 24 295 2357 2365 (Pubitemid 43788103)
46. Ko C. W., Riffle S., Michaels L. et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 8 166 173