Dynamic analysis of MAPK signaling using a high-throughput microfluidic single-cell imaging platform

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 3758-3763

  Taylor, R J ^a,b   Falconnet, D ^b   Niemisto A ^a   Ramsey, S A ^a   Prinza, S ^a   Shmulevich, I ^a   Galitski, T ^a   Hansen, C L ^b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Live cell imaging; Microscopy; Systems biology; Yeast

Indexed keywords

MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ENVIRONMENT; DELETION MUTANT; FUS3 GENE; GENE DELETION; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT MICROFLUIDIC SINGLE CELL IMAGING; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; KSS1 GENE; MICROFLUIDIC ANALYSIS; MSG5 GENE; MUTATOR GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PTP2 GENE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAP KINASE SIGNALING SYSTEM; MICROFLUIDICS; MUTATION; PEPTIDES; PHENOTYPE; PHEROMONES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 62649094918     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0813416106     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ingolia NT, Murray AW (2007) Positive-feedback loops as a flexible biological module. Curr Biol 17:668-677.
2. Paliwal S, et al. (2007) MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast. Nature 446:46-51.
3. Zhou J, Arora M, Stone DE (1999) The yeast pheromone-responsive G α protein stimulates recovery from chronic pheromone treatment by two mechanisms that are activated at distinct levels of stimulus. Cell Biochem Biophys 30:193-212.
4. Doi K, et al. (1994) MSG5, a novel protein phosphatase promotes adaptation to pheromone response in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J 13:61-70.
5. Acar M, Becskei A, van Oudenaarden A (2005) Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions. Nature 435:228-232.
6. Sigal A, et al. (2006) Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells. Nature 444:643-646.
7. Yao G, Lee TJ, Mori S, Nevins JR, You L (2008) A bistable Rb-E2F switch underlies the restriction point. Nat Cell Biol 10:476-482.
8. Chen RE, Thorner J (2007) Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: Lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773:1311-1340.
9. Downward J (2003) Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 3:11-22.
10. Sabbagh W, Jr, Flatauer LJ, Bardwell AJ, Bardwell L (2001) Specificity of MAP kinase signaling in yeast differentiation involves transient versus sustained MAPK activation. Mol Cell 8:683-691.
11. Madhani HD, Styles CA, Fink GR (1997) MAP kinases with distinct inhibitory functions impart signaling specificity during yeast differentiation. Cell 91:673-684.
12. Choi KY, Satterberg B, Lyons DM, Elion EA (1994) Ste5 tethers multiple protein kinases in the MAP kinase cascade required for mating in S. cerevisiae. Cell 78:499-512.
13. Zhan XL, Deschenes RJ, Guan KL (1997) Differential regulation of FUS3 MAP kinase by tyrosine-specific phosphatases PTP2/PTP3 and dual-specificity phosphatase MSG5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 11:1690-1702.
14. Roberts CJ, et al. (2000) Signaling and circuitry of multiple MAPK pathways revealed by a matrix of global gene expression profiles. Science 287:873-880.
15. Flory MR, et al. (2006) Quantitative proteomic analysis of the budding yeast cell cycle using acid-cleavable isotope-coded affinity tag reagents. Proteomics 6:6146-6157.
16. Colman-Lerner A, et al. (2005) Regulated cell-to-cell variation in a cell-fate decision system. Nature 437:699-706.
17. Zamir E, Bastiaens PI (2008) Reverse engineering intracellular biochemical networks. Nat Chem Biol 4:643-647.
18. Groisman A, et al. (2005) A microfluidic chemostat for experiments with bacterial and yeast cells. Nat Methods 2:685-689.
19. Bennett MR, et al. (2008) Metabolic gene regulation in a dynamically changing environment. Nature 454:1119-1122.
20. Hersen P, McClean MN, Mahadevan L, Ramanathan S (2008) Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:7165-7170.
21. Mettetal JT, Muzzey D, Gomez-Uribe C, van Oudenaarden A (2008) The frequency dependence of osmo-adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 319:482-484.
22. King KR, et al. (2007) A high-throughput microfluidic real-time gene expression living cell array. Lab Chip 7:77-85.
23. Hung PJ, Lee PJ, Sabounchi P, Lin R, Lee LP (2005) Continuous perfusion microfluidic cell culture array for high-throughput cell-based assays. Biotechnol Bioeng 89:1-8.
24. Gomez-Sjoberg R, Leyrat AA, Pirone DM, Chen CS, Quake SR (2007) Versatile, fully automated, microfluidic cell culture system. Anal Chem 79:8557-8563.
25. Cheong R, Wang CJ, Levchenko A (October 2008) High-content cell screening in a microfluidic device. Mol Cell Proteomics 10.1074/mcpM8000291- MCP200.
26. Thorsen T, Maerkl SJ, Quake SR (2002) Microfluidic large-scale integration. Science 298:580-584.
27. Unger MA, Chou HP, Thorsen T, Scherer A, Quake SR (2000) Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. Science 288:113-116.
28. McClean MN, Mody A, Broach JR, Ramanathan S (2007) Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways. Nat Genet 39:409-414.
29. Narayanaswamy R, et al. (2006) Systematic profiling of cellular phenotypes with spotted cell microarrays reveals mating-pheromone response genes. Genome Biol 7:R6.
30. Rad MR, Xu G, Hollenberg CP (1992) STE50, a novel gene required for activation of conjugation at an early step in mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 236:145-154.
31. Yu RC, et al. (2008) Negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast signalling. Nature 456:755-761.
32. Breitkreutz A, Boucher L, Tyers M (2001) MAPK specificity in the yeast pheromone response independent of transcriptional activation. Curr Biol 11:1266-1271.
33. Heiman MG, Walter P (2000) Prm1p, a pheromone-regulated multispanning membrane protein, facilitates plasma membrane fusion during yeast mating. J Cell Biol 151:719-730.
34. Hao N, et al. (2008) Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. Mol Cell 30:649-656.
35. Erdman S, Snyder M (2001) A filamentous growth response mediated by the yeast mating pathway. Genetics 159:919-928.
36. Farley FW, Satterberg B, Goldsmith EJ, Elion EA (1999) Relative dependence of different outputs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway on the MAP kinase Fus3p. Genetics 151:1425-1444.
37. Levi JD (1956) Mating reaction in yeast. Nature 177:2.
38. Charvin G, Cross FR, Siggia ED (2008) A microfluidic device for temporally controlled gene expression and long-term fluorescent imaging in unperturbed dividing yeast cells. PLoS ONE 3:e1468.
39. Patterson GH, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2002) A photoactivatable GFP for selective photolabeling of proteins and cells. Science 297:1873-1877.
40. Golding I, Paulsson J, Zawilski SM, Cox EC (2005) Real-time kinetics of gene activity in individual bacteria. Cell 123:1025-1036.
41. Schwartz MA, Madhani HD (2004) Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu Rev Genet 38:725-748.
42. Hansen CL, Sommer MO, Quake SR (2004) Systematic investigation of protein phase behavior with a microfluidic formulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14431-14436.