Factors influencing women's selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods after counselling in 11 countries: Results from a subanalysis of the CHOICE study

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 372-380

  Bitzer, Johannes ^a   Cupanik, Vladimir ^b   Fait, Tomas ^c   Gemzell Danielsson, Kristina ^d   Grob, Paul ^e   Oddens, Björn J ^f   Pawelczyk, Leszek ^g   Unzeitig, Vit ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b GPN Sro   (Slovakia)

^c CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^d KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e Biostatistics and Research Decision Sciences   (Sweden)

^f Global Medical Affairs   (Sweden)

^g POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Poland)

^h MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Combined hormonal contraception; Combined oral contraceptive; Counselling; Transdermal contraceptive patch; Vaginal contraceptive ring

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CONDOM; COUNSELING; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GYNECOLOGIST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDWIFE; PILL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; VAGINA RING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES, FEMALE; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL, COMBINED; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL, HORMONAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; ISRAEL; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SEX FACTORS; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884578124     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: 14730782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2013.819077     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Blumenthal P D, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17: 121-37.
2. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006; 38: 90-6.
3. Bajos N, Leridon H, Goulard H, et al. Contraception: From accessibility to effi ciency. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 994-9.
4. Trussell J, Wynn LL. Reducing unintended pregnancy in the United States. Contraception 2008; 77: 1-5.
5. Weisman CS, Maccannon DS, Henderson JT, et al. Contraceptive counseling in managed care: Preventing unintended pregnancy in adults. Women's Health Issues 2002; 12: 79-95.
6. Bitzer J, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Roumen F, et al. The CHOICE study: Effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012; 17: 65-78.
7. Egarter C, Grimm C, Nouri K, et a l. Contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices: Results of the CHOICE study in Austria. Reprod Biomed Online 2012; 24: 692-7.
8. Fait T. Predictors of combined hormone contraception choice between Czech and Slovak women. Ceska Gynekol 2011; 76: 190-3.
9. Fait T, Apetauer I. Importance of the consultation for combined hormonal contraception's choice-results of CHOICE project in Czech and Slovak Republic. Ceska Gynekol 2011; 76: 140-4.
10. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Thunell L, Lindeberg M, et a l. Comprehensive counseling about combined hormonal contraceptives changes the choice of contraceptive methods: Results of the CHOICE program in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011; 90: 869-77.
11. Merckx M, Donders G, Grandjean P, et al. Does structured counselling infl uence combined hormonal contraceptive choice? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011; 16: 418-29.
12. Lete I, Doval J L, Perez-Campos E, et a l. Factors affecting women's selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: The TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional study. Contraception 2007; 76: 77-83.
13. Costa ARR, Palma F, SáJL, et al. Impact of a women' s counselling programme on combined hormonal contraception in Portugal-The IMAGINE Study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011; 16: 409-17.
14. The Reproductive Health Report: The state of sexual and reproductive health within the European Union. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011; 16(Suppl. 1): S1-S70.
15. Pittman ME, Secura GM, Allsworth JE, et al. Understanding prescription adherence: Pharmacy claims data from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception 2011; 83: 340-5.
16. Stuart J, Secura G, Zhao Q, et al. Factors associated with 12-month continuation among oral contraceptive pill and contraceptive vaginal ring users (Abstract). Contraception 2011; 84: 305.
17. Martinez-Astorquiza Ortiz d e Zárate T, Sancho Sanchez C, Osset J. Women's compliance and reasons for noncompliance to combined hormonal contraceptives in Spain (Abstract). Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012; 17 (Suppl. 1): S130.