The CHOICE study: Effect of counselling on the selection of combined hormonal contraceptive methods in 11 countries

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 65-78

  Bitzer, Johannes ^a   Gemzell Danielsson, Kristina ^b   Roumen, Frans ^c   Marintcheva Petrova, Maya ^d   Van Bakel, Bas ^e   Oddens, Björn J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c Zuyderland Medical Centre   (Netherlands)

^d MSD   (Netherlands)

^e OCS Consulting   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Combined hormonal contraception; Combined oral contraceptive; Counselling; Transdermal contraceptive patch; Vaginal contraceptive ring

Indexed keywords

ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; BELGIUM; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CZECH REPUBLIC; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; ISRAEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; POLAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SLOVAKIA; SWEDEN; SWITZERLAND; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; UKRAINE; VAGINA RING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; COUNSELING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RUSSIA; SWEDEN; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 84855862388     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: 14730782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2011.637586     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R. Unintended pregnancy: Worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann 2010;41:241-50.
2. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83:397-404.
3. The Reproductive Health Report: The state of sexual and reproductive health within the European Union. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011;16(Suppl. 1): S1-S70.
4. Davie JE, Walling MR, Mansour DJ, et al. Impact of patient counseling on acceptance of the levonorgestrel implant contraceptive in the United Kingdom. Clin Ther 1996;18:150-9. (Pubitemid 26268349)
5. Hubacher D, Goco N, Gonzalez B, Taylor D. Factors affecting continuation rates of DMPA. Contraception 1999;60:345-51. (Pubitemid 30133223)
6. Canto De Cetina TE, Canto P, Ordoñ ez Luna M. Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception 2001;63:143-6. (Pubitemid 32451806)
7. Backman T, Huhtala S, Luoto R, et al. Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99: 608-13. (Pubitemid 34246299)
8. van den Heuvel MW, van Bragt AJ, Alnabawy AK, Kaptein MC. Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: The vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive. Contraception 2005;72: 168-74. (Pubitemid 41133355)
9. Lete I, Doval JL, Pér ez-Campos E, et al. Factors affecting womens selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: The TEAM-06 Spanish crosssectional study. Contraception 2007;76:77-83. (Pubitemid 47090168)
10. Costa ARR, Palma F, Sá JL, et al. Impact of a womens counselling programme on combined hormonal contraception in Portugal - the IMAGINE study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011;16:409-17.
11. Merckx M, Donders G, Grandjean P, et al. Does structured counselling infl uence combined hormonal contraceptive choice? Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011;16:418-29.
12. Fait T. [Predictors of combined hormone contraception choice between Czech and Slovak women]. Ceska Gynekol 2011;76:190-3.
13. Fait T, Apetauer I. [Importance of the consultation for combined hormonal contraceptions choice - results of CHOICE project in Czech and Slovak Republic]. Ceska Gynekol 2011;76:140-4.
14. Gemzell-Danielsson K, Thunell L, Lindeberg M, et al. Comprehensive counseling about combined hormonal contraceptives changes the choice of contraceptive methods: Results of the CHOICE program in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:869-77.
15. Merki-Feld GS, Gruber IM. Intention to use a combined contraceptive method and choice after structured counseling in Switzerland. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2012 ;17: In press.
16. Rengel M. E ncyclopedia of birth control. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press 2000:126.
17. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division. World contraceptive use 2011. Accessed 4 October 2011 from: http://www.un. org/esa/population/publications/contraceptive2011/ wallchart-front.pdf
18. May WL, Johnson WD. A SAS macro for constructing simultaneous confi dence intervals for multinomial proportions. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1997;53:153-62. (Pubitemid 27305434)
19. Skouby SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: A comprehensive study across fi ve European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2004;9: 57-68. (Pubitemid 38858247)
20. Gilliam M, Holmquist S, Berlin A. Factors associated with willingness to use the contraceptive vaginal ring. Contraception 2007;76:30-4. (Pubitemid 46935115)
21. Hooper DJ. Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: A global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey. Clin Drug Invest 2010;30:749-63.
22. Freeman S. Nondaily hormonal contraception: Considerations in contraceptive choice and patient counseling. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2004;16:226-38.