Contraceptive counselling and factors affecting women's contraceptive choices: Results of the CHOICE study in Austria

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 692-697

  Egarter, Christian ^a   Grimm, Christoph ^a   Nouri, Kazem ^a   Ahrendt, Hans Joachim ^b   Bitzer, Johannes ^c   Cermak, Christine ^d  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b Klinische Forschung und Weiterbildung   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^d MSD   (Austria)

Author keywords

Austria; contraception; counselling; daily pill; monthly ring; weekly patch

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTRACEPTION; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; VAGINA RING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRIA; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTION; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; GYNECOLOGY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PARITY; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PREGNANCY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862847433     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: 14726491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. The Reproductive Health Report, 2011. The state of sexual and reproductive health within the European Union. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 16, S1-S70.
2. Bitzer, J., Bjorn Oddens, B., Gemzell-Danielsson, K., 2011. CHOICE: results from an HCP counselling study with women considering combined hormonal contraception. In: 59th Annual Clinical Meeting (ACM) of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Washington, DC.
3. Fait, T., 2011. Predictors of combined hormone contraception choice between Czech and Slovak women. Ceska Gynekol. 76, 190-193.
4. Fait, T., Apetauer, I., 2011. Importance of the consultation for combined hormonal contraception's choice - results of CHOICE project in Czech and Slovak Republic. Ceska Gynekol. 76, 140-144.
5. Floyd, R.L., Sobell, M., Velasquez, M.M., Ingersoll, K., Nettleman, M., Sobell, L., Mullen, P.D., Ceperich, S., von Sternberg, K., Bolton, B., Johnson, K., Skarpness, B., Nagaraja, J. Project CHOICES Efficacy Study Group, 2007. Preventing alcohol- exposed pregnancies: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Prev. Med. 32, 1-10.
6. Gemzell-Danielsson, K., Thunell, L., Lindeberg, M., Tydén, T., Marintcheva-Petrova, M., Oddens, B.J., 2011. Comprehensive counselling about combined hormonal contraceptives changes the choice of contraceptive methods: results of the CHOICE program in Sweden. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 90, 869-877.
7. Guttmacher Institute and World Health Organization, 2007. Facts on induced abortion worldwide.
8. Lete, I., Doval, J.L., Pérez-Campos, E., Sánchez-Borrego, R., Correa, M., de la Viuda, E., Gómez, M.A., González, J.V., Lertxundi, R., Martínez, M.T., Mendoza, N., Robledo, J., 2007. Factors affecting women's selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: the TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional study. Contraception 76, 77-83.
9. May, W.L., Johnson, W.D., 1997. A SAS macro for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 53, 153-162.
10. Merckx, M., Donders, G.G., Grandjean, P., Van de Sande, T., Weyers, S., 2011. Does structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice? Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 16, 418-429.
11. Merki-Feld, G.S., Gruber, I.M., in press. Intention to use a combined contraceptive method and choice after structured counselling in Switzerland. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care [Epub ahead of print].
12. Oddens, B.J., 1996. Current accessibility and perceptions about the pill in Western Europe. In: Hannaford, P.C., Webb, A.M.C. (Eds.), Evidence-based Prescribing of the Pill. Parthenon, Carnforth, pp. S27-S43.
13. Oddens, B.J., 1997a. Determinants of contraceptive use among women of reproductive age in Great Britain and Germany: II. Psychological factors. J. Biosoc. Sci. 29, 437-470.
14. Oddens, B.J., 1997b. Determinants of contraceptive use: from birth control to fertility awareness. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 71, 1-2.
15. Rovner, J., 1996. US abortion survey produces surprise statistics. The Lancet 348, 470.
16. Saeed, G.A., Fakhar, S., Rahim, F., Tabassum, S., 2008. Change in trend of contraceptive uptake - effect of educational leaflets and counselling. Contraception 77, 377-381.
17. Schunmann, C., Glasier, A., 2006. Specialist contraceptive counselling and provision after termination of pregnancy improves uptake of long-acting methods but does not prevent repeat abortion: a randomized trial. Hum. Reprod. 21, 2296-2303.
18. Sedgh, G., Henshaw, S.K., Singh, S., Bankole, A., Drescher, J., 2007. Legal abortion worldwide: incidence and recent trends. Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 33, 106-116.
19. Skouby, S.O., 2004. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 9, 57-68.
20. Visser, A.P., Remennick, L., Bruyniks, N., 1993. Contraception in Russia: attitude, knowledge and practice of doctors. Plan. Parent. Eur. 22, 26-29.