Does structured counselling influence combined hormonal contraceptive choice?

European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 418-429

  Merckx, Mireille ^a   Donders, Gilbert G ^b,c   Grandjean, Pascale ^d   Van De Sande, Tine ^e   Weyers, Steven ^f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

^b Heilig Hart Ziekenhuis   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^d Centre Hospitalier Regional de Mons   (Belgium)

^e MSD   (Belgium)

^f GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Combined hormonal contraception; Combined oral contraceptives; Counselling; Transdermal patch; Vaginal contraceptive ring

Indexed keywords

COMBINED ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; BELGIUM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DRUG USE; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STRUCTURED COUNSELLING; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; VAGINA RING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BELGIUM; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES, FEMALE; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL, COMBINED; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL, HORMONAL; COUNSELING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PORTUGAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80955126748     PISSN: 13625187     EISSN: 14730782     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2011.625882     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Sedgh G, Singh S, Henshaw SK, Bankole A. Legal abortion worldwide in 2008: Levels and recent trends. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2011;37:84-94.
2. Verougstraete A. Falen van anticonceptie in België , moeilijkheden bij het beteugelen van de fertiliteit en bij anticonceptiegebruik [Failure of contraception in Belgium, diffi culties in restraining fertility and in contraceptive use]. Gunaïkeia 2008: special number on contraception: 12-17 (in Dutch). Accessed 13 August 2011 from: http:// www.vvog.be/docs/2009/07/ 11063902.pdf
3. Sedgh G, Henshaw S, Singh S, et al. Induced abortion: Estimated rates and trends worldwide. Lancet 2007;370: 1338-45. (Pubitemid 47539568)
4. Rovner J. US abortion survey produces surprise statistics. Lancet 1996;348:470.
5. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83:397-404.
6. Rosenberg M, Waugh MS. Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:S276-9. (Pubitemid 29100650)
7. Rajasekar D, Bigrigg A. Pill knowledge amongst oral contraceptive users in family planning clinics in Scotland: Facts, myths and fantasies. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2000;5:85-90. (Pubitemid 30321325)
8. Lete I, Doval JL, Pé r ez-Campos E, et al. Self-described impact of noncompliance among users of a combined hormonal contraceptive method. Contraception 2008; 77:276-82.
9. Glasier A, Fairhurst K, Wyke S, e t al. Advanced provision of emergency contraception does not reduce abortion rates. Contraception 2004;69:361-6. (Pubitemid 38510325)
10. Wiebe ER, Sent L, Fong S, e t al. Barriers to use of oral contraceptives in ethnic Chinese women presenting for abortion. Contraception 2002;65:159-63. (Pubitemid 34258506)
11. Teutsch C. Patient-doctor communication. M ed Clin North Am 2003;87:1115-45. (Pubitemid 37339025)
12. Canto De Cetina TE, Canto P, Ordoñez Luna M. Effect of counseling to improve compliance in Mexican women receiving depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. Contraception 2001;63:143-6. (Pubitemid 32451806)
13. Backman T, Huhtala S, Luoto R, e t al. Advance information improves user satisfaction with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:608-13. (Pubitemid 34246299)
14. Lete I, Doval JL, P ér ez-Campos E, e t al. Factors affecting women ' s selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: the TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional study. Contraception 2007;76:77-83. (Pubitemid 47090168)
15. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect 1998;30:24-9, 46.
16. Van Bussel J. Zwangerschapsafbreking in België (1993- 2005) [Abortion in Belgium (1993-2005)]. CRZ [Centre for relationship building and pregnancy-related problems] 2006. (in Dutch) Accessed 10 August 2011 from: http://www.crz.be/downloads/Zwangerschapsafbreking- 1993-2005.pdf
17. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:90-6. (Pubitemid 43882311)
18. Davis A, Wysocki S. Clinician/patient interaction: communicating the benefi ts and risks of oral contraceptives. Contraception 1999;59(1 Suppl.):39S-42S. (Pubitemid 29174409)
19. Lei Z-W, Wu SC, Garceau RJ, e t al. Effect of pretreatment counseling on discontinuation rates in Chinese women given depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Contraception 1996;53:357-61. (Pubitemid 26175688)
20. Saeed GA, Fakhar S, Rahim F, e t al. Change in trend of contraceptive uptake-effect of educational leafl ets and counseling. Contraception 2008;77:377-81.
21. Vogt C, Schaefer M. Disparities in knowledge and interest about benefi ts and risks of combined oral contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2011;16: 183-93.