Predictors of combined hormone contraception choice between Czech and Slovak women;Kritéria českých a slovenských žen při výběru kombinované hormonální antikoncepce

Ceska Gynekologie

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 190-193

  Fait, T ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

CHOICE project; Combined hormonal contraception; Criteria for choice; Patch; Pill; Vaginal ring

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CZECH REPUBLIC; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SLOVAKIA; TRANSDERMAL PATCH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL, HORMONAL; CZECH REPUBLIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES, MEDICATED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SLOVAKIA; TRANSDERMAL PATCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960234014     PISSN: 12107832     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Draper, L. Working women and contraception. AAOHN J, 2006, 54, p. 2304-2311.
2. Fait, T. Význam konzultace při výběru kombinované hormonální antikoncepce - výsledky studie CHOICE v České a Slovenské republice. Čes Gynek, 2011, 76, 2, s. 140-144.
3. Fiebig, DG., Knox, S., Vinex, R., et al. Preferences for new and existing contraceptive products. Health Econ, 2010, Epub ahead of print.
4. Lete, I., Doval, JL., Perez-Campos, E., et al. Factors affecting women's selection of a combined hormonal contraceptive method: the TEAM-06 Spanish cross-sectional study. Contraception, 2007, 76, p. 77-83. (Pubitemid 47090168)
5. Lopez, LM, Steiner, MJ., Grimes, DA., Schulz, KF. Strategies for communication contraceptive effectiveness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008, 16, 2, CD006964.
6. May, WL., Johonson, WD. A SAS macro for constructing simultaneous confidence intervals for multinomial proportions. Computer methods and programs. Biomedicine, 1997, 53, p. 153-162. (Pubitemid 27305434)
7. Skouby, SO. Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care, 2004, 9, 2, p. 57-68. (Pubitemid 38858247)
8. Urdl, W., Apter, D., Alperstein, A., et al. Contraceptive efficacy, compliance and beyondfactors related to satisfaction with onceweekly transdermal compared with oral contraception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2005, 121, p. 202-210. (Pubitemid 41074094)