Numerical approximation abilities correlate with and predict informal but not formal mathematics abilities

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 116, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 829-838

  Libertus, Melissa E ^a   Feigenson, Lisa ^a   Halberda, Justin ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Approximate number system (ANS); Formal math; Individual differences; Informal math; Longitudinal study; Nonsymbolic numerical comparison

Indexed keywords

AGE; APPROXIMATE NUMBER SYSTEM (ANS); APTITUDE; APTITUDE TEST; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FORMAL MATH; HUMAN; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INDIVIDUALITY; INFORMAL MATH; INTELLIGENCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICS; NONSYMBOLIC NUMERICAL COMPARISON; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

APPROXIMATE NUMBER SYSTEM (ANS); FORMAL MATH; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INFORMAL MATH; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; NONSYMBOLIC NUMERICAL COMPARISON;

AGE FACTORS; APTITUDE; APTITUDE TESTS; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MATHEMATICS;

EID: 84884559731     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baroody A.J. Children's mathematical thinking: A developmental framework for preschool, primary, and special education teachers 1987, Teachers College Press, New York.
2. Barth H., La Mont K., Lipton J., Spelke E.S. Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005, 102:14116-14121.
3. Brannon E.M., Merritt D.J. Evolutionary foundations of the approximate number system. Space, time, and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought 2011, 207-224. Academic Press, London. S. Dehaene, E.M. Brannon (Eds.).
4. Castronovo J., Göbel S.M. Impact of high mathematics education on the number sense. PLoS One 2012, 7:e33832.
5. De Smedt B., Verschaffel L., Ghesquiere P. The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2009, 103:469-479.
6. Dehaene S. Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition 1992, 44:1-42.
7. Desoete A., Ceulemans A., De Weerdt F., Pieters S. Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2010, 82:64-81.
8. DeWind N.K., Brannon E.M. Malleability of the approximate number system: Effects of feedback and training. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012, 6:68.
9. Feigenson L., Dehaene S., Spelke E. Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:307-314.
10. Feigenson L., Libertus M.E., Halberda J. Links between the intuitive sense of number and formal mathematics ability. Child Development Perspectives 2013, 7:74-79.
11. Gilmore C.K., McCarthy S.E., Spelke E.S. Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction. Nature 2007, 447:589-591.
12. Gilmore C.K., McCarthy S.E., Spelke E.S. Non-symbolic arithmetic abilities and mathematics achievement in the first year of formal schooling. Cognition 2010, 115:394-406.
13. Ginsburg H.P., Baroody A.J. Test of early mathematics ability 2003, Pro-Ed, Austin, TX. 3rd ed.
14. Halberda J., Feigenson L. Developmental change in the acuity of the "number sense": The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology 2008, 44:1457-1465.
15. Halberda, J., & Ly, R. (2013). Panamath: The psychophysical assessment of number-sense acuity. Unpublished manuscript, Johns Hopkins University.
16. Halberda J., Ly R., Willmer J., Naiman D., Germine L. Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109:11116-11120.
17. Halberda J., Mazzocco M.M., Feigenson L. Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with math achievement. Nature 2008, 455:665-668.
18. Holloway I.D., Ansari D. Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2009, 103:17-29.
19. Inglis M., Attridge N., Batchelor S., Gilmore C. Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2011, 18:1222-1229.
20. Izard V., Sann C., Spelke E.S., Streri A. Newborn infants perceive abstract numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:10382-10385.
21. Jordan N.C., Kaplan D., Ramineni C., Locuniak M.N. Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology 2009, 45:850-867.
22. Libertus M.E., Brannon E.M. Stable individual differences in number discrimination in infancy. Developmental Science 2010, 13:900-906.
23. Libertus M.E., Brannon E.M., Woldorff M. Parallels in stimulus-driven oscillatory brain responses to numerosity changes in adults and seven-month-old infants. Developmental Neuropsychology 2011, 36:651-667.
24. Libertus M.E., Feigenson L., Halberda J. Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Developmental Science 2011, 14:1292-1300.
25. Libertus M.E., Feigenson L., Halberda J. Is approximate number precision a stable predictor of math ability?. Learning and Individual Differences 2013, 25:126-133.
26. Libertus M.E., Odic D., Halberda J. Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination. Acta Psychologica 2012, 141:373-379.
27. Lourenco S.F., Bonny J.W., Fernandez E.P., Rao S. Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2012, 109:18737-18742.
28. Lyons I.M., Beilock S.L. Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence. Cognition 2011, 121:256-261.
29. Mazzocco M.M., Feigenson L., Halberda J. Preschoolers' precision of the approximate number system predicts later school mathematics performance. PLoS One 2011, 6:e23749.
30. Mazzocco M.M., Thompson R.E. Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 2005, 20:142-155.
31. National Mathematics Advisory Panel Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel 2008, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC.
32. Price G.R., Palmer D., Battista C., Ansari D. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: Reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults. Acta Psychologica 2012, 140:50-57.
33. Raman M. Coordinating informal and formal aspects of mathematics: Student behavior and textbook messages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 2002, 21:135-150.
34. Rousselle L., Noel M.P. Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition 2007, 102:361-395.
35. Russell R.L., Ginsburg H.P. Cognitive analysis of children's mathematics difficulties. Cognition and Instruction 1984, 1:217-244.
36. Sasanguie D., De Smedt B., Defever E., Reynvoet B. Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 2012, 30:344-357.
37. Xu F., Spelke E.S. Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 2000, 74:B1-B11.