Research article: Vgaze-augmented interaction improves problem-solving: New evidence from verbal protocols

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 836-844

  Bednarik, Roman ^a   Gowases, Tersia ^a   Tukiainen, Markku ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Gaze interaction; Interaction design; Planning; Problem solving

Indexed keywords

PLANNING; STEREO VISION; USER INTERFACES;

COGNITIVE PROCESSING; GAZE INTERACTION; GAZE-BASED INTERACTION; INTERACTION DESIGN; INTERACTION DEVICES; PROBLEM SOLVING PROCESS; QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES; STRATEGY SELECTION;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84884497543     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2012.659216     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adelson, B. and Soloway, E., 1985. The role of domain experience in software design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 11, 1351-1360. (Pubitemid 16539522)
2. Allwood, C., 1986. Novices on the computer: a review of the literature. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25 (6), 633-658. (Pubitemid 17097153)
3. Bednarik, R., Gowases, T., and Tukiainen, M., 2009. Gaze interaction enhances problem solving: effects of dwell-time based, gaze-augmented, and mouse interaction on problem-solving strategies and user experience. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3 (1), 1-10.
4. Bennett, K.B. and Flach, J.M., 1992. Graphical displays: implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors, 34, 513-533.
5. Cockburn, A., et al, 2007. Hard lessons: effort-inducing interfaces benefit spatial learning. In: CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, San Jose, CA, USA, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 1571-1580. (Pubitemid 47581751)
6. Duchowski, A.T., 2007. Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. Secaucus, NJ, USA: Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc.
7. Ericsson, K.A. and Lehmann, A.C., 1996. Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47 (1), 273-305. (Pubitemid 126416109)
8. Gowases, T., Bednarik, R., and Tukiainen, M., 2008. Gaze vs. mouse in games: the effects on user experience. In: ICCE2008: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on computers in education, ICCE 2008, 773-777.
9. Grammenos, D., 2008. Game over: learning by dying. In: CHI '08: Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy, NY, USA: ACM, 1443-1452.
10. Gray, W.D., et al, 2006. The soft constraints hypothesis: a rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113 (3), 461-482. (Pubitemid 44118166)
11. Hansen, J.P., Johansen, A.S., and Hansen, D.W., 2003. Command without a click: dwell time typing by mouse and gaze selections. In: INTERACT'03, IOS Press, 121-128.
12. Jacob, R., et al, 2007. CHI2006: what is the next generation of human-computer interaction? Interactions, 14 (3), 53-58. (Pubitemid 46725689)
13. Jeong, A., 2005. A guide to analyzing message-response sequences and group interaction patterns in computer mediated communication. Distance Education, 26 (3), 367-383. (Pubitemid 41670476)
14. Kumar, M., Paepcke, A., and Winograd, T., 2007. EyePoint: practical pointing and selection using gaze and keyboard. In: CHI '07, San Jose, CA, USA, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 421-430. (Pubitemid 47581628)
15. Majaranta, P. and Raiha, K.J., 2002. Twenty years of eye typing: systems and design issues. In: ETRA '02, New Orleans, LA, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 15-22.
16. Morgan, P.L. and Patrick, J., 2010. Designing interfaces that encourage a more effortful cognitive strategy. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, 54 (4), 408-412.
17. Morgan, P.L., et al, 2007. Harder to access, better performance? the effects of information access cost on strategy and performance. In: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Human interface, Beijing, China Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 115-125.
18. O'Hara, K.P. and Payne, S.J., 1998. The effects of operator cost of planfulness of problem solving and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 34-70. (Pubitemid 128428608)
19. O'Hara, K.P. and Payne, S.J., 1999. Planning and the user interface: the effects of lockout time and error recovery cost. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 50 (1), 41-59.
20. Ohno, T., Mukawa, N., and Kawato, S., 2003. Just blink your eyes: a head-free gaze tracking system. In: CHI '03, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, 950-957.
21. Olson, G.M., Herbsleb, J.D., and Rueter, H.H., 1994. Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques. Human-Computer Interaction, 9 (4), 427-472.
22. Payne, S.J., Howes, A., and Reader, W.R., 2001. Adaptively distributing cognition: a decision-making perspective on human - computer interaction. Behaviour & IT, 20 (5), 339-346. (Pubitemid 34917024)
23. Pizlo, Z. and Li, Z., 2005. Solving combinatorial problems: the 15-puzzle. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1069-1084. (Pubitemid 46196668)
24. Sibert, L.E. and Jacob, R.J.K., 2000. Evaluation of eye gaze interaction. In: CHI '00, The Hague, The Netherlands, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 281-288.
25. Smith, J.D. and Graham, T.C.N., 2006. Use of eye movements for video game control. In: ACE '06, Hollywood, CA, New York, NY, USA: ACM, 20.
26. Špakov, O., 2005. EyeChess: the tutoring game with visual attentive interface. In: G. Evreinov, ed. Proceedings of "Alternative access: feelings and games 2005,", report B-2005-2. Department of Computer Sciences, University of Tampere, 81-86.
27. Starker, I. and Bolt, R.A., 1990. A gaze-responsive self-disclosing display. In: CHI '90, Seattle, WA, USA, New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, 3-10.
28. Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., and Tabachneck-Schijf, H.J.M., 2005. The role of interface style in planning during problem solving. In: 27th annual cognitive science conference, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2771-2776.
29. Van Nimwegen, C., et al, 2006. Does an interface with less assistance provoke more thoughtful behavior? In: ICLS'06: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences, Bloomington: Indiana International Society of the Learning Sciences, 785-791.
30. Waldron, S.M., Patrick, J., and Duggan, G.B., 2011. The influence of goal-state access cost on planning during problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 485-503.
31. Waldron, S.M., et al, 2007. Influencing cognitive strategy by manipulating information access. The Computer Journal, 50 (6), 694-702. (Pubitemid 350031417)
32. Zhai, S., 2003. What's in the eyes for attentive input. Communications of the ACM, 46 (3), 34-39.
33. Zhai, S., Morimoto, C., and Ihde, S., 1999. Manual and gaze input cascaded (MAGIC) pointing. In: CHI '99, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, NY, USA: ACM Press, 246-253.
34. Zhang, J. and Norman, D., 1994. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18 (1), 87-122.