Designing interfaces that encourage a more effortful cognitive strategy

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 408-412

  Morgan, Phillip L ^a   Patrick, John ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE LOADS; COGNITIVE PROCESSING; COGNITIVE STRATEGY; DESIGN SOLUTIONS; INFORMATION ACCESS; INTERFACE DESIGNS; MOUSE MOVEMENTS; POSITIVE EFFECTS; SOFT CONSTRAINT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME COST; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES;

ERGONOMICS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 79952977885     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118110X12829369202150     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Altmann, E. M., & Trafton, G. J. (2002). Memory for goals: An activation-based model. Cognitive Science, 26, 39-83.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Bainbridge, L. (1987). Ironies of automation. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan, & J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 271-283). New York: Wiley.
5. Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., & Pelz, J. B. (1995). Memory representations in natural tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7(1), 66-80.
6. Cary, M., & Carlson, R. A. (2001). Distributing working memory resources during problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 836-848.
7. Collomb, M., Hascoet, M., Baudisch, P., & Lee, B. (2005). Improving drag-and-drop on wall-size displays. Proceedings of G1 2005 (pp. 25-32). Victoria, BC.
8. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 11, 671-684.
9. Dasarathy, B. V. (2001). Information Fusion - what, where, why, when, and how? Information Fusion, 2, 75-76.
10. Davies, S. P. (2003). Initial and concurrent planning in solutions to well-structured problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A(7), 1147-1164.
11. De Keyser, V. (1988). How can computer-based visual displays aid operators? In E. Hollangel, G. Mancini, & D. D. Woods (Eds.), Cognitive engineering in complex dynamic worlds (pp. 15-22). London: Academic Press.
12. Flynn, E. A., Barker, K. N., Gibson, J. T., Pearson, R. E., Berger, B. A., & Smith, L. A. (1999). Impact of interruptions and distractions on dispensing errors in an ambulatory care pharmacy. American Journal of Health System Pharmacy, 56, 1319-1325. (Pubitemid 29316094)
13. Furnas, G. W. (1986). Generalized fisheye views. Proceeding of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 18-23.
14. Gersh, J. R., McKneely, J. A., & Remington, R. W. (2005). Cognitive Engineering: Understanding human interaction with complex systems. John Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 26(4), 377-382. (Pubitemid 44638280)
15. Glover, J. A. (1989). Improving readers' estimates of learning from text: The role of inserted questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 68-75.
16. Gray, W. D., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2000). Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategics and their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 322-335.
17. Gray, W. D., & Fu, W.-T. (2004), Soft constraints in interactive behaviour: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science, 28, 359-383.
18. Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behaviour. Psychological Review, 113, 461-482.
19. Kirsh, D. (2000). A few thoughts on cognitive overload. Intellectica, 30, 19-52.
20. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., Graham, T., & Rall, E. (2004). Delaying execution of intentions: Overcoming the cost of interruptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18(5), 533-547. (Pubitemid 39462039)
21. McFarlane, D. C. (2002). Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 63-139.
22. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1-43. (Pubitemid 126311608)
23. Monk, C. A., Trafton, J. G., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2008). The effect of interruption duration and demand on resuming suspended goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 299-313.
24. Morgan, P. L., Patrick, J., Waldron, S. M., King, S. L., & Patrick, T. (2009). Improving memory after interruption: Exploiting soft constraints and manipulating information access cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(4), 291-306.
25. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 16, 519-533.
26. Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. L. (1993). Performance consequences of automation induced "complacency". International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
28. Pawlak, W. S., & Vicente, K. J. (1996). Inducing operator control through ecological interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 653-688. (Pubitemid 126359439)
29. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K-P. L. (2010). Cumulative knowledge and progress in human factors. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 623-651.
30. Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207-217.
31. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251-296
32. Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992). Ecological interface design: Theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics (pp. 589-606). SMC-22.
33. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Duggan, G. B. (in press). The influence of goal-state access cost on planning during problem solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
34. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Duggan, G. B., Banbury, S., & Howes, A. (2008). Designing information fusion for the encoding of visual-spatial information. Ergonomics, 51(6), 775-797. (Pubitemid 351916863)
35. Waldron, S. M., Patrick, J., Morgan, P. L., & King, S. L. (2007). Influencing cognitive strategy by manipulating information access costs. The Computer Journal, 50(6), 694-702. (Pubitemid 350031417)
36. Woods, D, D. (1986). Paradigms for intelligent decision support. In E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini & D. D. Woods (Eds.), Intelligent decision support in process environments. New York: Springer-Verlag.
37. Woods, D. D., Patterson, E. S., & Roth, E. M. (2002). Can we ever escape from data overload? A cognitive systems diagnosis. Cognition, Technology, & Work, 4, 22-36.
38. th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society Rochester, NY.