Prosthesis-patient mismatch in bovine pericardial aortic valves: Evaluation using 3 different modalities and associated medium-term outcomes

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 776-783

  Chacko, Satish Jacob ^a   Ansari, Asimul H ^a   McCarthy, Patrick M ^a   Malaisrie, S Chris ^a   Andrei, Adin Cristian ^a   Li, Zhi ^a   Lee, Richard ^a   McGee, Edwin ^a   Bonow, Robert O ^a   Puthumana, Jyothy J ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; ASE; Prosthesis patient mismatch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; AORTA ROOT; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS PATIENT MISMATCH; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL RATE;

AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; ASE; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CATTLE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RISK FACTORS; SYSTOLE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84884476490     PISSN: 19419651     EISSN: 19420080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.000319     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978; 58: 20-24. (Pubitemid 8376654)
2. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart. 2006; 92: 1022-1029. (Pubitemid 44125207)
3. Flameng W, Meuris B, Herijgers P, Herregods MC. Prosthesis-patient mismatch is not clinically relevant in aortic valve replacement using the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006; 82: 530-536. (Pubitemid 44088650)
4. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WR, Birkmeyer NJ, Lemmer JH Jr, Miller DC, Butchart EG, Rizzoli G, Yacoub M, Chai A. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003; 126: 783-796. (Pubitemid 37151965)
5. Blais C, Dumesnil JG, Baillot R, Simard S, Doyle D, Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2003; 108: 983-988. (Pubitemid 37048229)
6. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, Joyner CD, Fremes SE, Morgan CD, Mitoff PR, Goldman BS. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002; 73: 1822-1829; discussion 1829. (Pubitemid 34596724)
7. Rao V, Jamieson WR, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2000; 102: III5-III9.
8. Howell NJ, Keogh BE, Ray D, Bonser RS, Graham TR, Mascaro J, Rooney SJ, Wilson IC, Pagano D. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement does not affect survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 89: 60-64.
9. Mascherbauer J, Rosenhek R, Fuchs C, Pernicka E, Klaar U, Scholten C, Heger M, Wollenek G, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Moderate patient-prosthesis mismatch after valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis has no impact on short-term and long-term mortality. Heart. 2008; 94: 1639-1645.
10. Moon MR, Lawton JS, Moazami N, Munfakh NA, Pasque MK, Damiano RJ Jr. POINT: Prosthesis-patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137: 278-283.
11. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1131-1141.
12. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Cartier PC, Métras J, Lemieux MD. Patient-prosthesis mismatch can be predicted at the time of operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001; 71(suppl 5): S265-S268. (Pubitemid 32436976)
13. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Lemieux M, Cartier P, Métras J, Durand LG. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bio-prosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998; 7: 211-218. (Pubitemid 28168500)
14. Pibarot P, Honos GN, Durand LG, Dumesnil JG. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status. Can J Cardiol. 1996; 12: 379-387. (Pubitemid 26140488)
15. Florath I, Albert A, Rosendahl U, Ennker IC, Ennker J. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch estimated by echocardiographic-determined effective orifice area on long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement. Am Heart J. 2008; 155: 1135-1142. (Pubitemid 351721024)
16. Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, Foster E, Gottdiener JS, Grayburn PA, Khandheria BK, Levine RA, Marx GR, Miller FA, Jr, Nakatani S, Quinones MA, Rakowski H, Rodriguez LL, Swaminathan M, Waggoner AD, Weissman NJ, Zabalgoitia M. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22: 975-1014; quiz 1082-1014.
17. Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 131: 1036-1044.
18. Mohty D, Dumesnil JG, Echahidi N, Mathieu P, Dagenais F, Voisine P, Pibarot P. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53: 39-47.
19. Koch CG, Khandwala F, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Blackstone EH. Impact of prosthesis-patient size on functional recovery after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2005; 111: 3221-3229. (Pubitemid 40874993)
20. Doenst T, Amorim PA, Al-Alam N, Lehmann S, Mukherjee C, Faerber G. Where is the common sense in aortic valve replacement? A review of hemodynamics and sizing of stented tissue valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142: 1180-1187.
21. Dellgren G, David TE, Raanani E, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 124: 146-154.
22. Kulik A, Al-Saigh M, Chan V, Masters RG, Bédard P, Lam BK, Rubens FD, Hendry PJ, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Enlargement of the small aortic root during aortic valve replacement: is there a benefit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85: 94-100. (Pubitemid 350284578)
23. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1152-1158.