A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by the LiDCOplus and FloTrac-Vigileo system

Anaesthesia

Volumn 64, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1004-1009

  De Wilde, R B P ^a   Geerts, B F ^a   Van Den Berg, P C M ^a   Jansen, J R C ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH; PROPOFOL; SUFENTANIL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEAD TILTING; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART STROKE VOLUME VARIATION; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG; MALE; PASSIVE LEG RAISING; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TIDAL VOLUME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 68149163176     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06009.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, Dupont J, Scherpereel P. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 1313-1321 (Pubitemid 29001568)
2. Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 1999; 159: 935-939 (Pubitemid 29137799)
3. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Critical Care 2000; 4: 282-289 (Pubitemid 30739891)
4. Pinsky MR. Probing the limits of arterial pulse contour analysis to predict preload responsiveness. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 96: 1245-1247
5. Pinsky MR. Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Intensive Care Medicine 2002; 28: 386-388
6. Linton RA, Jonas MM, Tibby SM, et al. Cardiac output measured by lithium dilution and transpulmonary thermodilution in patients in a paediatric intensive care unit. Intensive Care Medicine 2000; 26: 1507-1511
7. Hamilton TT, Huber LM, Jessen ME. PulseCO: a less-invasive method to monitor cardiac output from arterial pressure after cardiac surgery. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2002; 74: S1408-12.
8. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, Genoni M, Zollinger A, Hofer CK. Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/VigileoTM system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007; 99: 329-336 (Pubitemid 47316385)
9. de Wilde RB, Schreuder JJ, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR. An evaluation of cardiac output by five arterial pulse contour techniques during cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 760-768
10. Jansen JR, Versprille A. Improvement of cardiac output estimation by the thermodilution method during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Medicine 1986; 12: 71-79 (Pubitemid 16162642)
11. Jansen JR, Schreuder JJ, Settels JJ, Kloek JJ, Versprille A. An adequate strategy for the thermodilution technique in patients during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Medicine 1990; 16: 422-425
12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310 (Pubitemid 16134762)
13. Pitman EJ. A note on normal correlation. Biometrika 1939; 31: 9-12.
14. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods. Eighth edition. Ames, Iowa 50014, USA: Iowa State University Press, 1989.
15. Remington JW, Noback CR, Hamilton WF, Gold JJ. Volume elasticity characteristics of the human aorta and prediction of the stroke volume from the pressure pulse. American Journal of Physiology 1948; 153: 298-308.
16. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The static elastic properties of 45 human thoracic and 20 abdominal aortas in vitro and the parameters of a new model. Journal of Biomechanics 1984; 17: 425-435
17. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTracTM and PiCCOplusTM system. Critical Care 2008; 12: R82. (Pubitemid 351974298)
18. De Castro V, Goarin JP, Lhotel L, Mabrouk N, Perel A, Coriat P. Comparison of stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume respiratory variation (SVV) measured by the axillary artery pulse-contour method and by aortic Doppler echocardiography in patients undergoing aortic surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006; 97: 605-610 (Pubitemid 44593853)
19. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 1999; 15: 85-91.
20. Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration, and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation during positive-pressure ventilation. Critical Care Medicine 2008; 36: 2858-2862
21. Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128: 848-854 (Pubitemid 41140517)
22. Reuter DA, Kirchner A, Felbinger TW, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular stroke volume variation to assess fluid responsiveness in patients with reduced cardiac function. Critical Care Medicine 2003; 31: 1399-1404 (Pubitemid 36583850)
23. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2005; 95: 746-755 (Pubitemid 41762372)